Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T09:22:19.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Case for Necessitarianism by Amy Karofsky (Routledge, 2021). ISBN 9781032026169

Review products

A Case for Necessitarianism by Amy Karofsky (Routledge, 2021). ISBN 9781032026169

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2023

Samuel Kimpton-Nye
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Philosophy , Volume 99 , Issue 1 , January 2024 , pp. 132 - 137
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Royal Institute of Philosophy

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, David Malet, A Combinatorial Theory of Possibility (Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, Simon, ‘Morals and Modals’, in Blackburn, Simon (ed.), Essays in Quasi-Realism (Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Cowling, Sam, ‘The Limits of Modality’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 61:244 (2011), 473–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, Shamik, ‘Realism and the Absence of Value’, The Philosophical Review, 127:3 (2018): 279–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Divers, John, ‘Agnosticism About Other Worlds: A New Antirealist Programme in Modality’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 69:3 (2004), 660–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Kit, ‘Essence and Modality: The Second Philosophical Perspectives Lecture’, Philosophical Perspectives, 8 (1994), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (New York: Routledge, 1986).Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter, ‘Modal Epistemology’, Philosophical Studies, 92:1 (1998), 67–84.Google Scholar
Karofsky, Amy, A Case for Necessitarianism (New York: Routledge, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimpton-Nye, Samuel, ‘Can Hardcore Actualism Validate S5?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 102:2 (2021), 342–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David, ‘Are We Free to Break the Laws?’, Theoria 47:3 (1981), 113–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David, On the Plurality of Worlds (New York: Blackwell, 1986).Google Scholar
Nanay, Bence, ‘Do We See Apples as Edible?’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 92:3 (2011a), 305–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nanay, Bence, ‘Do We Sense Modalities with Our Sense Modalities?’, Ratio, 24:3 (2011b), 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartorio, Carolina, Causation and Free Will (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalkowski, Scott, ‘The Ontological Ground of the Alethic Modality’, The Philosophical Review, 103:4 (1994), 669–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skow, Bradford, ‘The Tenseless Theory of Time and the Moodless Theory of Modality’, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 100:2 (2019), 506–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skow, Bradford, ‘The Moodless Theory of Modality: An Introduction and Defence’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 100:2 (2022), 279–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, Amie, Norms and Necessity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Cleve, James, ‘Brute Necessity’, Philosophy Compass, 13:9 (2018), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetter, Barbara, Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar