Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-kw98b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-02T00:29:25.167Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neutral vowels in sound-symbolic vowel harmony in Korean*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2012

Darrell Larsen
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
Jeffrey Heinz
Affiliation:
University of Delaware

Abstract

The set of neutral vowels in the vowel-harmony pattern found in Modern Korean sound-symbolic words is traditionally considered to consist of two members: [i] and [ɨ]. Some authors have tentatively put forward the hypothesis that [u] and [y] are also neutral. A corpus study on the phonotactics of Korean sound-symbolic vowel harmony provides quantitative support both for the traditional understanding of [i] and [ɨ] as neutral vowels and for the tentative hypothesis that [u] and [y] are also neutral. Additionally, the corpus study reveals that vowels are neutral to different degrees. The vowel [a] is shown to be partially neutral, but unlike the other neutral vowels which are transparent, [a] is partially opaque. The distribution of diphthongs is also studied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We would like to thank the audiences at PLC 34, the University of Tokyo and the Phonology and Phonetics Lab Group at the University of Delaware. Additionally, we thank Bill Idsardi, Regine Lai, Andy Martin, James Rogers, the editors and an associate editor at Phonology, and three anonymous referees for their insightful comments on previous versions of this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Becker, Michael, Ketrez, Nihan & Nevins, Andrew (2011). The surfeit of the stimulus: analytic biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish laryngeal alternations. Lg 87. 84125.Google Scholar
Cho, Mi-Hui (1994). Vowel harmony in Korean: a grounded phonology approach. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Coleman, John & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1997). Stochastic phonological grammars and acceptability. In Coleman, John (ed.) Proceedings of the 3rd Meeting of the ACL Special Interest Group in Computational Phonology. Somerset, NJ : Association for Computational Linguistics. 4956.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John & Riggle, Jason (2012). Information theoretic approaches to phonological structure: the case of Finnish vowel harmony. NLLT 30. 859896.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Londe, Zsuzsa Cziráky (2006). Stochastic phonological knowledge: the case of Hungarian vowel harmony. Phonology 23. 59104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Sung-Hoon (2008). Variation and exceptions in the vowel harmony of Korean suffixes. The Journal of Studies in Language 24. 405428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, Sung-Hoon (2010). Gradient vowel cooccurrence restrictions in monomorphemic native Korean roots. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 16. 279295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, Fred (1999). Finnish: an essential grammar. 2nd edn.London & New York : Routledge.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. (1976). Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Li, Charles N. (ed.) Subject and topic. New York : Academic Press. 303333.Google Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Young-Key (1976). Semantic features in phonology: evidence from vowel harmony in Korean. CLS 12. 397412.Google Scholar
Ko, Seongyeon (2010). A contrastivist view on the evolution of the Korean vowel system. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 61. 181196.Google Scholar
Kwak, Chung-Ku (2003). The vowel system of contemporary Korean and direction of change. [In Korean.] Kwukehak 41. 5991.Google Scholar
Lee, Jin-Seong (1992). Phonology and sound symbolism of Korean ideophones. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Lee, Sang-Oak (1984). An overview of issues in the vowel system and vowel harmony of Korean: disharmony among the hypotheses of vowel harmony. Ohak Yongu [Language Research] 20. 417451.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John J. (1983). Phonological features and morphological structure. In Richardson, John F., Marks, Mitchell & Chukerman, Amy (eds.) Papers from the parasession on the interplay of phonology, morphology, and syntax. Chicago : Chicago Linguistic Society. 135161.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E. (1992). A reference grammar of Korean: a complete guide to the grammar and history of the Korean language. Singapore : Tuttle.Google Scholar
Park, Sayhyon (1990). Vowel harmony in Korean. Ohak Yongu [Language Research] 26. 469499.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet (1993). Dissimilarity in the Arabic verbal roots. NELS 23. 367381.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2012). R: a language and environment for statistical computing.Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.r-project.org.Google Scholar
Ringen, Catherine O. & Heinämäki, Orvokki (1999). Variation in Finnish vowel harmony: an OT account. NLLT 17. 303337.Google Scholar
Rounds, Carol (2001). Hungarian: an essential grammar. London & New York : Routledge.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sohn, Hyang-Sook (1986). Toward an integrated theory of morphophonology: vowel harmony in Korean. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 16:2. 157184.Google Scholar
Vago, Robert M. (1974). Hungarian generative phonology. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Vago, Robert M. (1976). Theoretical implications of Hungarian vowel harmony. LI 7. 243263.Google Scholar
Yang, Byunggon (1992). An acoustical study of Korean monophthongs produced by male and female speakers. JASA 91. 22802283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yun, Yungdo (2004). Glides and high vowels in Korean syllables. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Zuraw, Kie (2000). Patterned exceptions in phonology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar