Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T08:34:50.557Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sun-Ah Jun (ed.) (2014). Prosodic typology II: the phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. xv+587.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2015

Ryan Bennett
Ryan Bennett*
Affiliation:
Yale University
*
E-mail: ryan.bennett@yale.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Phonology , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , August 2015 , pp. 337 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arvaniti, Amalia, Ladd, D. Robert & Mennen, Ineke (2006). Phonetic effects of focus and ‘tonal crowding’ in intonation: evidence from Greek polar questions. Speech Communication 48. 667–696.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Hirschberg, Julia (1994). ToBI annotation conventions. Available (May 2015) at http://www.ling.ohio-state.edu/~tobi/ame_tobi.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., Hirschberg, Julia & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stephanie (2005). The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Jun (2005b). 9–54.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1986). Intonational structure in Japanese and English. Phonology Yearbook 3. 255–309.Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Venditti, Jennifer J. (2011). Intonation. In Goldsmith, et al. (2011). 485–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Ryan, Elfner, Emily & McCloskey, James (2015). Pronouns and prosody in Irish. In Breatnach, Liam, Ó hUiginn, Ruarí, McManus, Damian & Simms, Katharine (eds.) Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Celtic Studies. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Borowsky, Toni, Kawahara, Shigeto, Shinya, Takahito & Sugahara, Mariko (eds.) (2012). Prosody matters: essays in honor of Elisabeth Selkirk. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Buckley, Eugene (2009). Locality in metrical typology. Phonology 26. 389–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burdin, Rachel Steindel, Phillips-Bourass, Sara, Turnbull, Rory, Yasavul, Murat, Clopper, Cynthia G. & Tonhauser, Judith (2014). Variation in the prosody of focus in head-and head/edge-prominence languages. Lingua. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2014.10.001.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan (1997). Intonation. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan (2006). The de-accenting of given information: a cognitive universal? In Bernini, Giuliano & Schwartz, Marcia L. (eds.) Pragmatic organization of discourse in the languages of Europe. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 311–355.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne (2005). Lexical stress. In Pisoni, David B. & Remez, Robert E. (eds.) The handbook of speech perception. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell. 264–289.Google Scholar
Dilley, Laura C. (2010). Pitch range variation in English tonal contrasts: continuous or categorical? Phonetica 67. 63–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dilley, Laura C. & McAuley, J. Devin (2008). Distal prosodic context affects word segmentation and lexical processing. Journal of Memory and Language 59. 294–311.Google Scholar
Elfner, Emily (2012). Syntax–prosody interactions in Irish. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Elfner, Emily (2015). Recursion in prosodic phrasing: evidence from Connemara Irish. NLLT 33. DOI: 10.1017/S11049-014-9281-5.Google Scholar
Fougeron, Cécile & Keating, Patricia A. (1997). Articulatory strengthening at edges of prosodic domains. JASA 101. 3728–3740.Google Scholar
Frota, Sónia & Vigário, Marina (2013). Review of Borowsky et al. (2012). Phonology 30. 165–172.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A., Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.) (2011). The handbook of phonological theory. 2nd edn. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (2000). The tonal basis of final weight criteria. CLS 36:1. 141–156.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew (2014). Disentangling stress and pitch-accent: a typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.) Word stress: theoretical and typological issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 83–118.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1994). ‘Gesture’ in prosody: comments on the paper by Ladd. In Keating, Patricia A. (ed.) Phonological structure and phonetic form: papers in laboratory phonology III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 64–75.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce (1995). Metrical stress theory: principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, Daniel & Di Cristo, Albert (eds.) (1998). Intonation systems: a survey of twenty languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. (2011). Does Gokana really have no syllables? Or: what's so great about being universal? Phonology 28. 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon (1990). Prosodic constituency in the lexicon. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin (2009). The onset of the prosodic word. In Parker, Steve (ed.) Phonological argumentation: essays on evidence and motivation. London: Equinox. 227–260.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin (2013). Prosodic subcategories in Japanese. Lingua 124. 20–40.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah (1998). The Accentual Phrase in the Korean prosodic hierarchy. Phonology 15. 189–226.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah (2005a). Prosodic typology. In Jun (2005b). 430–458.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah (ed.) (2005b). Prosodic typology: the phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto (2012). The intonation of nominal parentheticals in Japanese. In Borowsky, et al. (2012). 304–340.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto & Shinya, Takahito (2008). The intonation of gapping and coordination in Japanese: evidence for Intonational Phrase and Utterance. Phonetica 65. 62–105.Google Scholar
Krivokapić, Jelena (2007). The planning, production, and perception of prosodic structure. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Kubozono, Haruo (2008). Japanese accent. In Miyagawa, Shigeru & Saito, Mamoru (eds.) The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. 165–191.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (1981). On intonational universals. In Myers, Terry, Laver, John & Anderson, John (eds.) The cognitive representation of speech. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 389–397.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (2001). Intonation. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf & Raible, Wolfgang (eds.) Language typology and language universals: an international handbook. Vol. 2. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. 1380–1390.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (2008a). Intonational phonology. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert (2008b). Review of Jun (2005b). Phonology 25. 372–376.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott & Hansen, Benjamin (2007). The origin of vowel length neutralization in final position: evidence from Finnish speakers. NLLT 25. 157–193.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye (2014). On the origins of the prosodic word in Russian. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2014. Available (May 2015) at http://www.speechprosody2014.org.Google Scholar
Pak, Marjorie (2008). The postsyntactic derivation and its phonological reflexes. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Beckman, Mary E. (1988). Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pitrelli, John F., Beckman, Mary E. & Hirschberg, Julia (1994). Evaluation of prosodic transcription labeling reliability in the ToBI framework. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 94). Yokohama: Acoustical Society of Japan. 123–126.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar (2011). Tonal alignment. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.) The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. 1185–1203.Google Scholar
Remijsen, Bert (2013). Tonal alignment is contrastive in falling contours in Dinka. Lg 89. 297–327.Google Scholar
Samuels, Bridget D. (2009). The structure of phonological theory. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias (2012). Direct interface and one-channel translation: a non-diacritic theory of the morphosyntax–phonology interface. Boston & Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Schiering, René, Bickel, Balthazar & Hildebrandt, Kristine A. (2010). The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent. JL 46. 657–709.Google Scholar
Schubö, Fabian, Roth, Anna, Haase, Viviana & Féry, Caroline (2015). Experimental investigations on the prosodic realization of restrictive and appositive relative clauses in German. Lingua 154. 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl, Amanda (2001). Minimal indirect reference: a theory of the syntax–phonology interface. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (1986). On derived domains in sentence phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3. 371–405.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (2005). Comments on intonational phrasing in English. In Frota, Sónia, Vigário, Marina & Freitas, Maria João (eds.) Prosodies: with special reference to Iberian languages. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 11–58.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth (2011). The syntax–phonology interface. In Goldsmith, et al. (2011). 435–484.Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie & Turk, Alice (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 25. 193–247.Google Scholar
Silverman, Kim, Beckman, Mary E., Pitrelli, John, Ostendorf, Mari, Wightman, Colin, Price, Patti, Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Hirschberg, Julia (1992). ToBI: a standard for labeling English prosody. In Ohala, John J., Nearey, Terrance M., Derwing, Bruce L., Hodge, Megan M. & Wiebe, Grace E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 1992 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. Edmonton: University of Alberta. 867–870.Google Scholar
Vogel, Irene (2009). Universals of prosodic structure. In Scalise, Sergio, Magni, Elisabetta & Bisetto, Antonietta (eds.) Universals of language today. Springer. 59–82.Google Scholar
Wagner, Michael (2010). Prosody and recursion in coordinate structures and beyond. NLLT 28. 183–237.Google Scholar
Wagner, Michael & Watson, Duane (2010). Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: a review. Language and Cognitive Processes 25. 905–945.Google Scholar
Watson, Duane & Gibson, Edward (2004). The relationship between intonational phrasing and syntactic structure in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes 19. 713–755.Google Scholar