Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-fdz9p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-25T21:27:33.352Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Access to plant genetic resources for genomic research for the poor: from global policies to target-oriented rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

Niels P. Louwaars*
Centre for Genetic Resources, Wageningen UR, PO Box 16, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Eva Thörn
Swedish Biodiversity Centre, Swedish Agricultural University, Alnarp, Sweden
José Esquinas-Alcázar
FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy
Shumin Wang
Institute for Crop Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
Abebe Demissie
Eastern African Plant Genetic Resources Network, Entebbe, Uganda
Clive Stannard
FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy
*Corresponding author: E-mail:


Applied genetics combined with practical plant breeding is a powerful tool in agricultural development and for food security. The Green Revolution spurred the world's potential to meet its food, feed and fibre needs at a time when vast regions were notoriously food-insecure. Subsequent adaptations of such strategies, from the late 1980s onwards, in order to develop new plant varieties in a more participatory way, have strengthened the focus on applying technology to farmers' diverse needs, feeding research results into a variety of seed systems. During these developments, there were no major legal impediments to the acquisition of either local or formal knowledge or of the building blocks of plant breeding: genetic resources. The emergence of molecular biology in plant science is creating a wealth of opportunities, both to understand better the limitations of crop production and to use a much wider array of genetic diversity in crop improvement. This ‘Gene Revolution’ needs to incorporate the lessons from the Green Revolution in order to reach its target groups. However, the policy environment has changed. Access to technologies is complicated by the spread of private rights (intellectual property rights), and access to genetic resources by new national access laws. Policies on access to genetic resources have changed from the concept of the ‘Heritage of Mankind’ for use for the benefit of all mankind to ‘National Sovereignty’, based on the Convention on Biological Diversity, for negotiated benefit-sharing between a provider and a user. The Generation Challenge Programme intends to use genomic techniques to identify and use characteristics that are of value to the resource-poor, and is looking for ways to promote freedom-to-operate for plant breeding technologies and materials. Biodiversity provides the basis for the effective use of these genomic techniques. National access regulations usually apply to all biodiversity indiscriminately and may cause obstacles or delays in the use of genetic resources in agriculture. Different policies are being developed in different regions. Some emphasize benefit-sharing, and limit access in order to implement this (the ‘African Model Law’), while others, in recognition of countries' interdependence, provide for facilitated access to all genetic resources under the jurisdiction of countries in the region (the Nordic Region). There are good reasons why the use of agricultural biodiversity needs to be regulated differently from industrial uses of biodiversity. The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, which entered into force in 2004, provides for facilitated access to agricultural genetic resources, at least for the crops that are included in the Treaty's ‘Multilateral System of Access and Benefit-sharing’. Ratification of the Treaty is proceeding apace, and negotiations have entered a critical stage in the development of practical instruments for its implementation. Although the scope of the Treaty is all plant genetic resources for food and agriculture, there are important crops that are not covered by its Multilateral System. Humanitarian licences are being used to provide access for the poor to protected technologies: countries may need to create such a general humanitarian access regime, to ensure the poor have the access they need to agricultural genetic resources.

Research Article
Copyright © NIAB 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Almekinders, CJM, Louwaars, NP, de Bruijn, GH (1994) Local seed systems and their importance for an improved seed supply in developing countries. Euphytica 78: 207216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borlaug, NE (1970) The Green Revolution, peace and humanity. Noble Lecture, 11 December, Scholar
Conway, G (1997) The Doubly Green Revolution. London: Penguin BooksGoogle Scholar
Conway, G (2003) From the Green Revolution to the biotechnology revolution: food for poor people in the 21st century. Director's Forum, 12 March, Woodrow Wilson, International Centre for Scholars.Google Scholar
Conway, GR and Barbier, EB (1990) After the Green Revolution: Sustainable Agriculture for Development. London: EarthscanGoogle Scholar
David, S and Sperling, L (1999) Improving technology delivery mechanisms: lessons from bean seed systems research in eastern and central Africa. Agriculture and Human Values 16: 381388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esquinas, J (2005) Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: political, ethical and technical challenges. Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 946953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evjen, G (2003) A Nordic Approach to Access and Rights to Genetic Resources Report to the Nordic Genetic Resources Council Scholar
FAO (2002) Food Insecurity in the World. Rome: FAOGoogle Scholar
FAO (2004) The State of Food and Agriculture, 20032004. Agricultural Biotechnology—Meeting the Needs of the Poor? Rome: FAOGoogle Scholar
Flores Palacios, X (1997) Contribution to the estimation of countries' interdependence in the area of plant genetic resources Background Study Paper no. 7 Rome: FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and AgricultureGoogle Scholar
Grain, (2000) AU Model Law on rights of local communities, farmers, breeders and access, Scholar
Hardon, J (2005) Plant Patents Beyond Control. Agrospecial Series 2 Wageningen: AgromisaGoogle Scholar
Harlan, JR and de Wet, JMJ (1971) Towards a rational classification of cultivated plants. Taxon 20: 509801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazell, PBR (2002) The Green Revolution and the Poor. Washington, DC: IFPRIGoogle Scholar
Lipton, M and Longhurst, R (1989) New seeds and Poor People. London: Unwin HymanGoogle Scholar
Louwaars, NP and van Marrewijk, GAM (1996) Seed Supply Systems in Developing Countries. Wegeningen: CTAGoogle Scholar
Louwaars, NP, Tripp, R, Eaton, D, Henson-Apollonio, V, Hu, R, Mendoza, M, Muhhuku, F, Pal, S and Wekundah, J (2005) Impacts of Strengthened Intellectual Property Rights Regimes on the Plant Breeding Industry in Developing Countries. Wageningen: Centre for Genetic ResourcesGoogle Scholar
McCalla, AF and Revoredo, CL (2001) Prospects for global food security: a critical appraisal of past projections and predictions 2020 Vision Discussion Paper no. 35 Washington, DC: IFPRIGoogle Scholar
MEA (2005) Millennium Ecosystems Assessment Synthesis Report Scholar
Mooney, PR (1979) Seeds of the Earth: A Public or Private Resource? Ottawa: Mutual PressGoogle Scholar
Pethiyagoda, R (2004) Biodiversity law has had some unintended effects. Nature 429 129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petit, M, Collins, W, Fowler, C, Correa, C and Thornström, C-G (2000) Why Governments Can't Make Policy—The Case of Plant Genetic Resources in the International Arena. GFAR/00/20-03. Rome: Global Forum for Agricultural Research for DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
Salazar, R, Louwaars, N and Visser, B (2006) Protecting farmers' new varieties: new approaches to rights on collective innovations in plant genetic resources. World Development (in press)Google Scholar
Shiva, V (1991) The Violence of the Green Revolution: Ecological Degradation and Political Conflict. London: Zed BooksGoogle Scholar
Smale, M and Day-Rubinstein, K (2002) The demand for crop genetic resources: international use of US National Plant Germplasm System. World Development 30: 16391655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stannard, C, van der Graaff, N, Randall, A, Lallas, P and Kenmore, P (2004) Agricultural biological diversity for food security: shaping international initiatives to help agriculture and the environment. Howard Law Journal 48 1 397430Google Scholar
Swaminathan, MS (1999) Harness the Gene Revolution to help feed the world. International Herald Tribune, 23 OctoberGoogle Scholar
Vavilov, NI (1951) The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants. Selected writings of N.I. Vavilov, translated from Russian by K. Starr Chester. Chronica Botanica 13: 1366.Google Scholar
Visser, B, Eaton, D, Louwaars, N and Engels, J (2003) Transaction costs of germplasm exchange under bilateral agreements. In: GFAR/IPGRI (eds) Strengthening Partnerships in Agricultural Research for Development in the Context of Globalisation. Proceedings of the GFAR 2000 Conference, 21–23 May 2000, Dresden, Germany. Rome: GFAR and IPGRI, pp. 5180.Google Scholar