Skip to main content Accessibility help

Influencing the imagined ‘polar regions’: the politics of Japan's Arctic and Antarctic policies

  • Aki Tonami (a1) (a2)


How does a state that is not a ‘natural’ Arctic or Antarctic state perceive the polar regions, interpret their roles in its foreign policy and translate this into actual polar policy? This paper seeks to answer these questions by comparing the Arctic and Antarctic policies of Japan. The paper shows that Japan's national image of the polar regions as a combined region began before World War II due to its imperial past of joining the race to the Antarctic and the Arctic. However, from a policy point of view, the polar regions for Japan long meant primarily Antarctica. Japan, as a defeated power and a late-comer to the international system established after World War II, takes a liberal position in the governance of Antarctica. Having and maintaining a capability to conduct scientific research in the Antarctic via international decision-making institutions has been considered an important status marker associated with great power identity. Regarding the Arctic, Japan attempts to replicate the general success of its Antarctic policy, backed by tools of science and technological diplomacy, the purpose of which is to revive its domestic economy. Japan's scientific whaling in the Antarctic is primarily a domestic, identity-based political conflict between a nostalgia for Japan's imperial past and its more modern, liberal identity of today.



Hide All
Akashi, H. (2011). Notes on the Science-Technology Basic Law regime [in Japanese]. Journal of Management Faculty, Komazawa University, 40, 3988.
Anisimov, O. A., Vaughan, D. G., Callaghan, T. V., Furgal, C., Marchant, H., Prowse, T. D., . . . Walsh, J. E. (2007). Polar regions (Arctic and Antarctic). In: Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., & Hanson, C. E. (Eds.). Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 653685). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anton, D. K. (2009). Antarctic whaling: Australia's attempt to protect whales in the Southern Ocean. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 36, 319351.
Arctic Economic Council. (2014). Backgrounder. Retrieved from
Bennett, M. M., Greaves, W., Riedlsperger, R., & Botella, A. (2016). Articulating the Arctic: contrasting state and Inuit maps of the Canadian north. Polar Record, 52, 630644.
Blay, S. K. N. (1992). Current developments: new trends in the protection of the Antarctic environment. The 1991 Madrid Protocol. The American Journal of International Law, 86, 377399.
Blok, A. (2008). Contesting global norms: politics of identity in Japanese pro-whaling countermobilization. Global Environmental Politics, 8, 3966.
Blok, A. (2011). War of the whales: post-sovereign science and agonistic cosmopolitics in Japanese-global whaling assemblages. Science, Technology & Human Values, 36, 5581.
Cabinet Office of Japan. (2015). The Science and Technology Basic Law (unofficial translation).
Catalinac, A. L., & Chan, G. (2005). Japan, the West, and the whaling issue: understanding the Japanese side. Japan Forum, 17, 133163.
Chaturvedi, S. (1996). The polar regions: a political geography. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Clark, I. (2007). Legitimacy in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hara, K. (1999). Rethinking the “Cold War” in the Asia‐Pacific. The Pacific Review, 12, 515536.
Hara, K. (2006). Cold War frontiers in the Asia-Pacific: divided territories in the San Francisco system. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hashimoto, S. (2009). Statement by H.E. Seiko Hashimoto, State Secretary for Foreign Affairs of Japan on the occasion of the 50th Anniversary of the Antarctic Treaty. Retrieved from
Herrmann, R. K. (2013). Perceptions and image theory in international relations. In: Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. S. (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed., pp. 135). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hook, G. D., Gibson, J., Hughes, C. W., & Dobson, H. (2012). Japan's international relations: politics, economics and security (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
International Court of Justice. (2014). Press release unofficial: whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening) the court finds that Japan's whaling programme in the Antarctic (JAPRA II) is not in accordance with three provisions of the Schedule to the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling. The Hague: International Court of Justice.
Ishii, A., & Okubo, A. (2007). An alternative explanation of Japan's whaling diplomacy in the post-moratorium era. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 10, 5587.
Joyner, C. C. (1989). Japan and the Antarctic Treaty System. Ecology Law Quarterly, 16, 155.
Kelley, J. (2004). International actors on the domestic scene: membership conditionality and socialization by international institutions. International Organization, 58, 134.
Lebow, R. N. (2016). National identities and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liu, M., & Kronbak, J. (2010). The potential economic viability of using the Northern Sea Route (NSR) as an alternative route between Asia and Europe. Journal of Transport Geography, 18, 434444.
Livingstone, D. N. (1992). The geographical tradition: episodes in the history of a contested enterprise. Oxford: Blackwell.
MEXT. (2010). Chikyukansokku suishin bukai Hokkyoku kentou sagyo bukai Hokokusho -Chukan torimatome-[Intermediate report of the Arctic Research Examination Working Group, the Earth Observation Promotion Committee]. Retrieved from
MoFA. (2013a). Antarctic Treaty/Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. Retrieved from
MoFA. (2013b). Q & A. Retrieved from
MoFA. (2015). ICJ and Japan. Retrieved from
Morikawa, J. (2009). Whaling in Japan: power, politics and diplomacy. London: Hurst & Company.
Naganobu, M. (2012a). Dokei no suiheisen e (1) Kotohajime [Towards the horizon of admiration (1) The beginning]. Rakusui, 837, 1216.
Naganobu, M. (2012b). Dokei no suiheisen e (4) Kita hyoyo eno shinkō [Towards the horizon of admiration (4) Moving towards the Arctic Ocean]. Rakusui, 840, 1423.
NIPR. (2003). Nankyoku Jōyaku Taisei [The Antarctic Treaty System]. Retrieved from
NIPR. (2014). The Antarctic JARE. Retrieved from
NIPR. (2016). Dai 58 ji kansokutai no goshōkai [Introducing the 58th research expedition]. Retrieved from
Oros, A. L. (2008). Normalizing Japan: politics, identity, and the evolution of security practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Roeschke, J. E. (2009). Eco-terrorism and piracy on the high seas: Japanese whaling and the rights of private groups to enforce international conservation law in neutral waters. Villanova Environmental Law Journal, 20, 99.
Scott, S. (1999). Australian diplomacy opposing Japanese Antarctic whaling 1945–1951: the role of legal argument. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 53, 179192.
Sea Shepherd. (2008). Operation Migaloo. Retrieved from
Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty. (2014). The Antarctic Treaty. Retrieved from
Strausz, M. (2014). Executives, legislatures, and whales: the birth of Japan's scientific whaling regime. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 14, 455478.
Suzuki, S. (2008). Seeking ‘legitimate’ great power status in post-cold war international society: China's and Japan's participation in UNPKO. International Relations, 22, 4563.
Headquarters for Ocean Policy. (2015). Japan's Arctic Policy.
Institute of Cetacean Research. (2013). Japan's research whaling in the Antarctic. Retrieved from
The Mainichi Shimbun. (2015). Shokuryō wo jikyū dekiruka (gyogyō hen) [Are we self-sufficient in fish?]. Retrieved from
Tomotsugu, S. (2013). Japan's attitude toward Antarctica from 1910 to 1964: at intersection of idealism and realism [in Japanese]. The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association, 64, 360380.
Tonami, A. (2016). Asian foreign policy in a changing Arctic: the diplomacy of economy and science at new frontiers. London: Palgrave McMillan.
Tonami, A., & Watters, S. (2012). Japan's Arctic policy: the sum of many parts. In: Heininen, L. (Ed.). Arctic Yearbook 2012 (pp. 93103). Akureyri: Northern Research Forum.
Urrestarazu, U. S. (2015). “Identity” in international relations and foreign policy theory. In: Jørgensen, K. E., Link, W., & Hellmann, G. Theorizing foreign policy in a globalized world (Vol. 4, pp. 126149). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Young, O. R. (2008). Building regimes for socioecological systems: institutional diagnostics. In: Young, O. R., King, L. A., & Schroeder, H. (Eds.). Institutions and Environmental change: principal findings, applications, and research frontiers (pp. 115144). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Influencing the imagined ‘polar regions’: the politics of Japan's Arctic and Antarctic policies

  • Aki Tonami (a1) (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed