Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Rahman, Hamisah Abd. Shah, Rohani Mohd Husin, Zaliha Hj and Abdullah, Nuraisyah Chua 2015. Strategic Interest of Malaysia's in Matters Concerning Policy on Antarctica. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 202, p. 303.

    Shah, Rohani Mohd 2015. Public Perceptions of Antarctic Values: Shaping Future Environmental Protection Policy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 168, p. 211.

    Shah, Rohani Mohd Husin, Zaliha Hj Abdullah, Nuraisyah Chua and Rahman, Hamisah Abd. 2015. Malaysia Strategies in Sustaining its Antarctic Endeavours. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 202, p. 115.

    Shah, Rohani Mohd and Hashim, Rugayah 2012. 2012 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications. p. 452.

    Weber, Mel 2012. Cooperation of the Antarctic Treaty System with the International Maritime Organization and the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators. The Polar Journal, Vol. 2, Issue. 2, p. 372.

    Hamzah, B.A. 2011. Malaysia and the 1959 Antarctic Treaty: a geopolitical interpretation. The Polar Journal, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 287.

    Leary, David 2008. Bi-polar Disorder? Is Bioprospecting an Emerging Issue for the Arctic as well as for Antarctica?. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 41.


The United Nations and Antarctica, 2005: the end of the ‘Question of Antarctica’?

  • Peter J. Beck (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 02 August 2006

In November 2005 the ‘Question of Antarctica’ was taken up yet again by the UN First Committee. Following formal placement upon its agenda in 1983 by the Malaysian government, the UN has discussed the topic regularly, initially annually, then biennially, but more recently upon a triennial basis. As usual, in 2005 UN members were guided by a lengthy report produced for the United Nations Secretary General (UNSG) by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) in order to outline recent developments affecting Antarctica and the Antarctic Treaty system (ATS). In November 2005 the UN First Committee, acting upon proposed amendments advanced by the Malaysian delegation, agreed to a major change of course. Thus, resolution L60, adopted by the committee without a vote, stipulated that the UN, though remaining ‘seized’ of the ‘Question of Antarctica’, would not place the topic upon the agenda of the 63rd. session in 2008. Nor would the UNSG be required, henceforth, to produce a report on Antarctica for members. In December 2005, the UN General Assembly adopted draft resolution L60 as resolution 60/47, once again without a vote. As a result, for the first time since 1983, the UN is no longer scheduled to return to the ‘Question of Antarctica’. Meanwhile, the episode has raised interesting questions about future developments: the UN's role, if any, in the ‘Question of Antarctica’, the direction of Malaysian policy towards the ATS, including membership thereof; the continued ability of the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Parties (ATCPs) to manage Antarctica in a democratic, transparent and accountable manner without attracting criticism from the broader international community; and the relevance of the common heritage principle to the Antarctic region.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Polar Record
  • ISSN: 0032-2474
  • EISSN: 1475-3057
  • URL: /core/journals/polar-record
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *