Skip to main content Accessibility help

Beyond LATE: Estimation of the Average Treatment Effect with an Instrumental Variable

  • Peter M. Aronow (a1) and Allison Carnegie (a2)


Political scientists frequently use instrumental variables (IV) estimation to estimate the causal effect of an endogenous treatment variable. However, when the treatment effect is heterogeneous, this estimation strategy only recovers the local average treatment effect (LATE). The LATE is an average treatment effect (ATE) for a subset of the population: units that receive treatment if and only if they are induced by an exogenous IV. However, researchers may instead be interested in the ATE for the entire population of interest. In this article, we develop a simple reweighting method for estimating the ATE, shedding light on the identification challenge posed in moving from the LATE to the ATE. We apply our method to two published experiments in political science in which we demonstrate that the LATE has the potential to substantively differ from the ATE.


Corresponding author

e-mail: (corresponding author)


Hide All

Authors' note: The replication archive for this article is available online at Aronow and Carnegie (2013). The authors acknowledge support from the Yale University Faculty of Arts and Sciences High-Performance Computing facility and staff. Helpful comments from Jake Bowers, John Bullock, Dan Butler, Lara Chausow, Adam Dynes, Ivan Fernandez-Val, Adam Glynn, Holger Kern, Malte Lierl, Mary McGrath, Joel Middleton, Cyrus Samii, two anonymous reviewers, and the participants of the Yale American Politics and Public Policy Workshop, the New Faces in Political Methodology Conference, and the Midwest Political Science Association Conference are greatly appreciated. We also thank Jonathan Katz for helpful editorial guidance. Special thanks to Bethany Albertson, Adria Lawrence, and David Nickerson for generous data sharing and to Dean Eckles, Alan Gerber, Don Green, Greg Huber, and Ken Scheve for particularly helpful conversations. All remaining errors are our own. Supplementary materials for this article are available on the Political Analysis Web site.



Hide All
Abadie, Alberto. 2002. Bootstrap tests for distributional treatment effects in instrumental variable models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 97(457): 284–92.
Albertson, Bethany, and Lawrence, Adria. 2009. After the credits roll: The long-term effects of educational television on public knowledge and attitudes. American Politics Research 37(2): 275300.
Altonji, J. G., and Dunn, T. A. 1996. The effects of family characteristics on the return to education. Review of Economics and Statistics 78: 692704.
Angrist, Joshua D., and Imbens, Guido W. 1995. Two-stage least squares estimation of average causal effects in models with variable treatment intensity. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90(430): 431–42.
Angrist, Joshua D., Imbens, Guido W., and Rubin, Donald B. 1996. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 91: 444–55.
Angrist, Joshua D., and Fernandez-Val, Ivan. 2013. ExtrapoLATE-ing: External validity and overidentification in the LATE framework. In Advances in economics and econometrics: Tenth world congress, Vol. 3, eds. Arellano Daron Acemoglu, Manuel, and Deke, Eddie, 401–36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Arceneaux, K., and Nickerson, D. W. 2009. Who is mobilized to vote? A re-analysis of 11 field experiments. American Journal of Political Science 53(1): 116.
Arceneaux, Kevin, and Nickerson, David W. 2010. Comparing negative and positive campaign messages. American Politics Research 38(1): 5483.
Aronow, Peter M., and Carnegie, Allison. 2013. Replication data for: Beyond LATE: Estimation of the average treatment effect with an instrumental variable. Dataverse Network. (accessed August 1, 2013).
Deaton, Angus. 2009. Instruments of development: Randomization in the tropics, and the search for the elusive keys to economic development. Proceedings of the British Academy, 2008 Lectures 162: 123–60.
Elliott, Michael R. 2009. Model averaging methods for weight trimming in generalized linear regression models. Journal of Official Statistics 25(1): 120.
Esterling, Kevin M., Neblo, Michael A., and Lazer, David M. J. 2011. Estimating treatment effects in the presence of noncompliance and nonresponse: The generalized endogenous treatment model. Political Analysis 19(2): 205–26.
Fodor, Imola. K. 2002. A survey of dimension reduction techniques. Center for Applied Scientific Computing, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Vol. 9: 118.
Follmann, Dean A. 2000. On the effect of treatment among would-be treatment compliers: An analysis of the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Journal of the American Statistical Association 95(452): 1101–9.
Frangakis, Constantine E., and Rubin, Donald B. 1999. Addressing complications of intention-to-treat analysis in the combined presence of all-or-none treatment-noncompliance and subsequent missing outcomes. Biometrika 86(2): 365–79.
Funk, Michele Jonsson, Westreich, Daniel, Wiesen, Chris, Strmer, Til, Alan Brookhart, M., and Davidian, Marie. 2011. Doubly robust estimation of causal effects. American Journal of Epidemiology 173(7): 761–7.
Geman, Stuart, and Hwang, Chii-Ruey. 1982. Nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation by the method of sieves. Annals of Statistics 10(2): 401–14.
Green, Donald P., Gerber, Alan S., and Nickerson, David W. 2003. Getting out the vote in local elections: Results from six door-to-door canvassing experiments. Journal of Politics 65(4): 1083–96.
Heckman, James J., and Urzua, Sergio. 2010. Comparing IV with structural models: What simple IV can and cannot identify. Journal of Econometrics 156(1): 2737.
Hidalgo, F. D., Naidu, S., Nichter, S., and Richardson, N. 2010. Economic determinants of land invasions. Review of Economics and Statistics 92(3): 505–23.
Hirano, Keisuke, Imbens, Guido W., Rubin, Donald B., and Zhou, Xiao-Hua. 2000. Assessing the effect of an influenza vaccine in an encouragement design. Biostatistics 1(1): 6988.
Horvitz, D. G., and Thompson, D. J. 1952. A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47(260): 663–85.
Humphreys, Macartan. 2009. Bounds on least squares estimates of causal effects in the presence of heterogeneous assignment probabilities. Working paper.
Imbens, Guido W. 2009. Better LATE than nothing: Some comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009). NBER Working paper.
Imbens, Guido W., and Rubin, Donald B. 1997. Bayesian inference for causal effects in randomized experiments with noncompliance. Annals of Statistics 25(1): 305–27.
Joffe, Marshall M., and Brensinger, Colleen. 2003. Weighting in instrumental variables and G-estimation. Statistics in Medicine 22(1): 1285–303.
Joffe, Marshall M., Ten Have, Thomas R., and Brensinger, Colleen. 2003. The compliance score as a regressor in randomized trials. Biostatistics 4(3): 327–40.
Putnam, Robert C. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and renewal of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rosenstone, Steven J., and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Roy, Jason, Hogan, Joseph W., and Marcus, Bess H. 2008. Principal stratification with predictors of compliance for randomized trials with 2 active treatments. Biostatistics 9(2): 277–89.
Rubin, Donald B. 1978. Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Annals of Statistics 6(1): 3458.
Rubin, Donald B. 2009. Author's reply: Should observational studies be designed to allow lack of balance in covariate distributions across treatment groups? Statistics in Medicine 28(9): 1420–23.
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E. 1995. Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wald, A. 1940. The fitting of straight lines if both variables are subject to error. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11: 284300.
Yau, Linda H.Y., and Little, Roderick J. 2001. Inference for the complier-average causal effect from longitudinal data subject to noncompliance and missing data, with application to a job training assessment for the unemployed. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96: 1232–44.
MathJax is a JavaScript display engine for mathematics. For more information see

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Aronow and Carnegie supplementary material

 PDF (1.8 MB)
1.8 MB

Beyond LATE: Estimation of the Average Treatment Effect with an Instrumental Variable

  • Peter M. Aronow (a1) and Allison Carnegie (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.