Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-vl9xn Total loading time: 0.403 Render date: 2022-01-27T00:32:47.820Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Alliances and the High Politics of International Trade*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2015

Abstract

What is the role of trade policy in military alliances? We analyze and test a game-theoretic model of economic and security cooperation in which allies hold different interests across the security and commercial aspects of the relationship. In equilibrium, allies with little market power who are valuable politically to larger states engage in sociallysuboptimal protectionism, as their allies’ threats of retaliation are incredible. Stable cooperation emerges in the form of unretaliated protection rather than mutually low trade barriers. We test the model’s implications against a dyadic data set of antidumping petitions from 1980 to 2013 and find that larger allies are more likely to tolerate protectionism by smaller allies by denying domestic petitions to retaliate against dumping measures by the latter.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© The European Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Scott Wolford, Associate Professor, Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin 158 W 21st St, Austin, TX 78712 (swolford@austin.utexas.edu). Moonhawk Kim, Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, UCB 333, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309-0333 (moonhawk.kim@colorado.edu). The authors thank Scott Adler, Aysegul Aydin, Andy Baker, Terry Chapman, Mike Findley, Doug Gibler, Amy Liu, Toby Rider, Emily Ritter, Anand Sokhey, and, especially, Eric Reinhardt, for helpful comments and suggestions, as well as the editors and anonymous reviewers at PSRM.

References

Allee, Todd. 2005. ‘The Political and Economic Value of GATT/WTO Dispute Initiation’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. September 1--September 4, 2005. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bagwell, Kyle, and Staiger, Robert. 2002. The Economics of the World Trading System. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, D. Scott. 1997. ‘Testing Alternative Models of Alliance Duration, 1816–1984’. American Journal of Political Science 41(3):846879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P. 2014. ‘Global Antidumping Database’. The World Bank. Available at http://econ.worldbank.org/ttbd/gad/, accessed 11 June 2014.Google Scholar
Fordham, Benjamin O. 2010. ‘Trade and Asymmetric Alliances’. Journal of Peace Research 47(6):685696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gartzke, Erik. 2007. ‘The Capitalist Peace’. American Journal of Political Science 51(1):166191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M. 2009. International Military Alliances, 1648–2008. Washington, DC: CQ Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1986. ‘The Political Economy of Trade: Institutions of Protection’. American Political Science Review 80(1):161184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, Judith, Rivers, Doug, and Tomz, Michael. 2007. ‘Institutions in International Relations: Understanding the Effects of GATT and the WTO on World Trade’. International Organization 61(1):3767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne, and Mansfield, Edward D.. 1993. ‘Power Politics and International Trade’. American Political Science Review 87(2):408420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowa, Joanne, and Mansfield, Edward D.. 2004. ‘Alliances, Imperfect Markets, and Major-Power Trade’. International Organization 58(4):775805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Wendy L., and Park, Kee Ok. 1995. ‘Nation-State and Pluralistic Decision Making in Trade Policy: The Case of the International Trade Administration’. International Studies Quarterly 39(2):181211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Wendy L., and Prusa, Thomas J.. 1997. ‘The Economics and Politics of Trade Policy: An Empirical Analysis of ITC Decision Making’. Review of International Economics 5(2):230245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekman, Bernard M., and Kostecki, Michel M.. 2009. The Political Economy of the World Trading System: The WTO and Beyond, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kasara, Kimuli. 2007. ‘Tax Me If You Can: Ethnic Geography, Democracy, and the Taxation of Agriculture in Africa’. American Political Science Review 101(1):159172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keshk, Omar M.G., Pollins, Brian M., and Reuveny, Rafael. 2004. ‘Trade Still Follows the Flag: The Primacy of Politics in a Simultaneous Model of Interdependence and Armed Conflict’. Journal of Politics 66(4):11551179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeds, Brett Ashley, Ritter, Jeffrey M., Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Long, Andrew G.. 2002. ‘Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions, 1815–1944’. International Interactions 28(3):237260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, Andrew G, and Leeds, Brett Ashley. 2006. ‘Trading for Security: Military Alliances and Economic Agreements’. Journal of Peace Research 43(4):433451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Bronson, Rachel. 1997. ‘Alliances, Preferential Trading Agreements, and International Trade’. American Political Science Review 91(1):94107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Monty G., and Jaggers, Keith. 2009. ‘Polity IV Project: Dataset Users Manual’. Center for Systemic Peace, University of Maryland, Vienna, VA.Google Scholar
Miranda, Jorege, Torres, Raul A., and Ruiz, Mario. 1998. ‘The International Use of Antidumping, 1987–1997’. Journal of World Trade 32(5):571.Google Scholar
Morrow, James D. 1991. ‘Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of Alliances’. American Journal of Political Science 35(4):904933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, James D. 2003. ‘When Do Relative Gains Impede Trade?’ In Gerald Schneider, Katherine Barbieri and Nils Petter Gleditsch (eds), Globalization and Armed Conflict, chapter 3, 4976. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mousseau, Michael. 2010. ‘Coming to Terms With the Capitalist Peace’. International Interactions 36(2):185213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur, and Zeckhauser, Richard. 1966. ‘An Economic Theory of Alliances’. Review of Economics and Statistics 48(3):266279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, Eric. 2000. ‘Aggressive Multilateralism: The Determinants of GATT/WTO Dispute Initiation, 1948–1998’, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, and Oneal, John. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Sandler, Todd. 1992. Collective Action: Theory and Applications. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Sandler, Todd, and Hartley, Keith. 2001. ‘Economics of Alliances: The Lessons for Collective Action’. Journal of Economic Literature 39(3):869896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H. 1997. Alliance Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations Statistical Division. 2015. ‘UN Commodity Trade Statistics Database (UN Comtrade)’. United Nations. Available at http://comtrade.un.org/, accessed 18 February 2015.Google Scholar
Vermulst, Edwin. 2005. ‘The 10 Major Problems with the Anti-Dumping Instrument in the European Community’. Journal of World Trade 39(1):105113.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2015. World Development Indicators. World Bank, Washington, DC. Available at http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators, accessed 25 February 2015.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Wolford Dataset

Link

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Alliances and the High Politics of International Trade*
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Alliances and the High Politics of International Trade*
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Alliances and the High Politics of International Trade*
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *