Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-ljdsm Total loading time: 0.247 Render date: 2021-07-29T01:04:38.228Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Do Elections Improve Constituency Responsiveness? Evidence from US Cities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2018

Darin Christensen
Affiliation:
Departments of Public Policy and Political Science, UCLA
Simon Ejdemyr
Affiliation:
2Facebook Inc
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Do elections motivate incumbent politicians to serve their voters? In this paper, we use millions of service requests placed by residents in US cities to measure constituency responsiveness. We then test whether an unusual policy change in New York City, which enabled city councilors to run for three rather than two terms in office, improved constituency responsiveness in previously term-limited councilors’ districts. Using difference-in-differences, we find robust evidence for this. Taking advantage of differential timing of local election races in New York City and San Francisco, we also find late-term improvements to responsiveness in districts represented by reelection-seeking incumbents. Elections improve municipal services, but also create cycles in constituency responsiveness. These findings have implications for theories of representative democracy.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The European Political Science Association 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A, Baqir, REasterly, W (1999) Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(4), 12431284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, J, Bueno de Mesquita, ERose, S (2011) Disentangling Accountability and Competence in Elections: Evidence from US Term Limits. The Journal of Politics 73(1), 171186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anzia, SF (2012) Partisan Power Play: The Origins of Local Election Timing as an American Political Institution. Studies in American Political Development 26(1), 2449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bails, DTieslau, MA (2000) The Impact of Fiscal Constitutions on State and Local Expenditures. Cato Journal 20, 255.Google Scholar
Bernard, RMRice, BR (1975) Political Environment and the Adoption of Progressive Municipal Reform. Journal of Urban History 1(2), 149174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T (2006) Principled Agents?: The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besley, TCase, A (1995) Does Electoral Accountability Affect Economic Policy Choices? Evidence from Gubernatorial Term Limits. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3), 769798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, TCase, A (2003) Political Institutions and Policy Choices: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Economic Literature XLI, 773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, A (1997) Textbook Municipal Reform. Urban Affairs Review 33(1), 97119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, B, Ferejohn, JFiorina, M (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, BEKousser, T (2004) Adapting to Term Limits: Recent Experiences and New Directions. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone, BPark, J-K (2012) Electoral Business Cycles in OECD Countries. American Political Science Review 106(1), 103122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canes-Wrone, B, Herron, MShotts, K (2001) Leadership and Pandering: A Theory of Executive Policymaking. American Journal of Political Science 45(3), 532550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, JM, Niemi, RGPowell, LW (1998) The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly 23(2), 271300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, JM, Niemi, RG, Powell, LWMoncrief, GF (2006) The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures: A New Survey of the 50 States. Legislative Studies Quarterly 31(1), 105134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, JL, Crespin, MH, Jenkins, JAVander Wielen, RJ (2004) Shirking in the Contemporary Congress: A Reappraisal. Political Analysis 12(2), 176179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, SHicks, JP (2008) Council Votes, 29 to 22, to Extend Term Limits. The New York Times. Available at http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/10/23/council-to-debate-term-limits-change/?_r=0, accessed 28 September 2018.Google Scholar
Clark, JHWilliams, RL (2013) Parties, Term Limits, and Representation in the US States. American Politics Research 42(1), 123.Google Scholar
Crain, WMOakley, LK (1995) The Politics of Infrastructure. Journal of Law and Economics 38, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crain, WMTollison, RD (1993) Time Inconsistency and Fiscal Policy: Empirical Analysis of US States, 1969--89. Journal of Public Economics 51(2), 153159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, J (2012) The Effects of Legislative Term Limits on State Fiscal Conditions. American Politics Research 41(3), 126.Google Scholar
Dewan, TShepsle, KA (2011) Political Economy Models of Elections. Annual Review of Political Science 14, 311331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erler, HA (2007) Legislative Term Limits and State Spending. Public Choice 133(3–4), 479494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraz, CFinan, F (2011) Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments. American Economic Review 101(4), 12741311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figlio, DN (1995) The Effect of Retirement on Political Shirking: Evidence from Congressional Voting. Public Finance Review 23(2), 226241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, MP (1989) Congress, Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Franzese, RJ (2002) Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Economic Policies and Outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 5(1), 369421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregg, FPoe, M (2013) Legistar-scrape. Available at https://github.com/fgregg/legistar-scrape, accessed 28 September 2018.Google Scholar
Grier, K (2008) US Presidential Elections and Real GDP Growth, 1961--2004. Public Choice 135(3–4), 337352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, G (2014) Do Selection Rules Affect Leader Responsiveness? Evidence from Rural Uganda. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9(1), 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, ZTrounstine, J (2005) Where Turnout Matters: The Consequences of Uneven Turnout in City Politics. Journal of Politics 67(2), 515535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, ZL (2009) America’s Uneven Democracy: Race, Turnout, and Representation in City Politics. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honan, E (2008) NY Council Extends Term Limit so Bloomberg Can Run. Reuters. Available at http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/10/23/us-newyork-bloomberg-idUSTRE49M70J20081023.Google Scholar
Huber, GAGordon, SC (2004) Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When it Runs for Office?. American Journal of Political Science 48(2), 247263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, GA, Hill, SJLenz, GS (2012) Sources of Bias in Retrospective Decision Making: Experimental Evidence on Voters’ Limitations in Controlling Incumbents. American Political Science Review 106(4), 720741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keele, L, Malhotra, NMcCubbins, CH (2013) Do Term Limits Restrain State Fiscal Policy? Approaches for Causal Inference in Assessing the Effects of Legislative Institutions. Legislative Studies Quarterly 38(3), 291326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G (1991) Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage. British Journal of Political Science 21(1), 119128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klasnja, MTitiunik, R (2017) The Incumbency Curse: Weak Parties, Term Limits, and Unfulfilled Accountability. American Political Science Review 111(1), 129148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, GA (2005) Electoral Incentives, Political Business Cycles and Macroeconomic Performance: Empirical Evidence from Post-War US Personal Income Growth. British Journal of Political Science 35(1), 77101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, GSHealy, A (2014) Substituting the End for the Whole: Why Voters Respond Primarily to the Election-Year Economy. American Journal of Political Science 58(1), 3147.Google Scholar
Levitt, SD (1997) Using Electoral Cycles in Police Hiring to Estimate the Effect of Police on Crime. The American Economic Review 87(3), 270290.Google Scholar
Lewis, DC (2012) Legislative Term Limits and Fiscal Policy Performance. Legislative Studies Quarterly 37(3), 305328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lott, J (1990) Attendance Rates, Political Shirking, and the Effect of Post-Elective Office Employment. Economic Inquiry 28(1), 133150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lott, JR (1987) Political Cheating. Public Choice 52(2), 169186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lott, JRBronars, SG (1993) Time Series Evidence on Shirking in the U.S. House of Representatives. Public Choice 76, 125149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madison, J (1966) Federalist No. 57. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Mayhew, DR (1987) The Electoral Connection and the Congress. In MD McCubbins and T Sullivan (eds), Congress: Structure and Policy, 1829. New York: Cambridge University Press Archive.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, WD (1975) The Political Business Cycle. The Review of Economic Studies 42(2), 169190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, A, Stokes, SManin, B (1999) Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, KS (1990) Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles. The American Economic Review 80(1), 2136.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, LSSanders, MS (2000) Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress. American Journal of Political Science 44(2), 316325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, CK, Schneider, FTollison, RD (1993) The Next 25 Years of Public Choice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sances, MW (2016) The Distributional Impact of Greater Responsiveness: Evidence from New York Towns. The Journal of Politics 78(1), 105119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San Francisco Department of Public Works (2010) FY 2010-11 Proposed Budget.Google Scholar
Shepsle, KA, Van Houweling, RP, Abrams, SJHanson, PC (2009) The Senate Electoral Cycle and Bicameral Appropriations Politics. American Journal of Political Science 53(2), 343359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snyder, JMTing, MM (2003) Roll Calls, Party Labels, and Elections. Political Analysis 11(4), 419444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tien, C (2001) Representation, Voluntary Retirement, and Shirking in the Last Term. Public Choice 106(1–2), 117130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, ER (1978) Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vanbeek, JR (1991) Does the Decision to Retire Increase the Amount of Political Shirking?. Public Finance Review 19(4), 444456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, GC (2007) Do Term Limits Affect Legislative Roll Call Voting? Representation, Polarization, and Participation. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7(3), 256280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Christensen and Ejdemyr Dataset

Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Christensen and Ejdemyr supplementary material

Christensen and Ejdemyr supplementary material
Download Christensen and Ejdemyr supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 1 MB
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Do Elections Improve Constituency Responsiveness? Evidence from US Cities
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Do Elections Improve Constituency Responsiveness? Evidence from US Cities
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Do Elections Improve Constituency Responsiveness? Evidence from US Cities
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *