Skip to main content Accessibility help

Disproportionality in media representations of campaign negativity

  • Dominic Nyhuis (a1), Hyunjin Song (a2) and Hajo Boomgaarden (a2)


We explore mediated representations of parties' campaign interactions in multi-party systems. Actors in multi-party systems can engage with different actors on multiple issues. One crucial aspect of such engagement is the element of negativity—voicing criticisms of other actors' actions and policy proposals. This contribution argues that the media systematically exaggerate patterns of negativity based on issue ownership structures, such that attacks originating from or targeting issue owners are significantly more likely to be covered. We analyze a broad sample of news content from the 2013 Austrian national election campaign with generalized exponential random graph models to capture the complexities of mediated campaign negativity in a multi-party system while controlling for non-mediated campaign negativity. The results show that issue owners are more likely to be featured as attackers and targets in owned policy domains, suggesting a violation of the normative ideal of a fair representation of campaign interactions.


Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail:


Hide All
Ansolabehere, S and Iyengar, S (1995) Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.
Arceneaux, K (2006) Do campaigns help voters learn? A cross-national analysis. British Journal of Political Science 36, 159173.
Brandenburg, H (2006) Party strategy and media bias: a quantitative analysis of the 2005 UK election campaign. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 16, 157178.
Budge, I and Farlie, DJ (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: Allen and Unwin.
Cheng, H and Riffe, D (2008) Attention, perception, and perceived effects: negative political advertising in a battleground state of the 2004 Presidential election. Mass Communication and Society 11, 177196.
Cranmer, S and Desmarais, BA (2016) A critique of dyadic design. International Studies Quarterly 60, 355362.
Cranmer, S, Leifeld, P, McClurg, SD and Rolfe, M (2017) Navigating the range of statistical tools for inferential network analysis. Mass Communication and Society 11, 177196.
Dalton, RJ, Beck, PA and Huckfeldt, R (1998a) Partisan cues and the media: information flows in the 1992 Presidential election. American Political Science Review 92, 111126.
Dalton, RJ, Beck, PA, Huckfeldt, R and Koetzle, W (1998b) A test of media-centered agenda setting: newspaper content and public interests in a Presidential election. Political Communication 15, 463481.
De Nooy, W and Kleinnijenhuis, J (2013) Polarization in the media during an election campaign: a dynamic network model predicting support and attack among political actors. Political Communication 30, 117138.
Desmarais, BA and Cranmer, SJ (2012) Micro-level interpretation of exponential random graph models with application to estuary networks. Policy Studies Journal 40, 402434.
Dolezal, M and Zeglovits, E (2014) Almost an earthquake: the Austrian parliamentary election of 2013. West European Politics 37, 644652.
Dolezal, M, Ennser-Jedenastik, L and Müller, WC (2015) When do parties attack their competitors? Negative campaigning in Austria, 2002–2008. In Nai, A and Walter, A (eds), New Perspectives on Negative Campaigning: Why Attack Politics Matters. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 163179.
Dolezal, M, Ennser-Jedenastik, L, Müller, WC and Winkler, AK (2016) Analyzing manifestos in their electoral context: a new approach applied to Austria, 2002–2008. Political Science Research and Methods 4, 641650.
Dolezal, M, Ennser-Jedenastik, L and Müller, WC (2017) Who will attack the competitors? How political parties resolve strategic and collective action dilemmas in negative campaigning. Party Politics 23, 666679.
Donsbach, W (2004) Psychology of news decisions: factors behind journalists' professional behavior. Journalism 5, 131157.
Eberl, J-M, Boomgaarden, HG and Wagner, M (2017) One bias fits all? Three types of media bias and their effects on party preferences. Communication Research 44, 11251148.
Elmelund-Præstekær, C (2008) Negative campaigning in a multiparty system. Representation 44, 2739.
Elmelund-Præstekær, C (2010) Beyond American negativity: toward a general understanding of the determinants of negative campaigning. European Political Science Review 2, 137155.
Elmelund-Præstekær, C (2011) Issue ownership as a determinant of negative campaigning. International Political Science Review 32, 209221.
Hansen, KM and Pedersen, RT (2008) Negative campaigning in a multi-party system. Scandinavian Political Studies 31, 408427.
Harcup, T and O'Neill, D (2001) What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journalism Studies 2, 261280.
Haselmayer, M and Jenny, M (2018) Friendly fire? Negative campaigning among coalition partners. Research & Politics 5, 2053168018796911.
Hayes, D (2008) Party reputations, journalistic expectations: how issue ownership influences election news. Political Communication 25, 377400.
Hayes, D (2010) The dynamics of agenda convergence and the paradox of competitiveness in Presidential campaigns. Political Research Quarterly 63, 594611.
Hopmann, DN, Elmelund-Præstekær, C, Albæk, E, Vliegenthart, R and Vreese, CH de (2012) Party media agenda-setting: how parties influence election news coverage. Party Politics 18, 173191.
Kahn, KF and Kenney, PJ (2000) How negative campaigning enhances knowledge of Senate elections. In Thurber, JA, Nelson, CJ and Dulio, DA (eds), Crowded Airwaves: Campaign Advertising in Elections. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 6595.
Kleinen-von Königslöw, K, Eberl, J-M, Haselmayer, M, Jacobi, C, Vonbun, R, Boomgaarden, H and Schönbach, K (2015) AUTNES Manual Content Analysis of Media Coverage 2013: Documentation. Vienna: University of Vienna.
Koopmans, R and Statham, P (1999) Political claims analysis: integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization 4, 4051.
Kritzinger, S, Zeglovits, E, Aichholzer, J, Glantschnigg, C, Glinitzer, K, Johann, D, Thomas, K and Wagner, M (2014) AUTNES Pre- and Post Panel Study 2013. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5859 data file version 1.0.0.
Krivitsky, PN (2012) Exponential-family random graph models for valued networks. Electronic Journal of Statistics 6, 11001128.
Lachat, R (2014) Issue ownership and the vote: the effects of associative and competence ownership on issue voting. Swiss Political Science Review 20, 727740.
Lau, RR and Pomper, GM (2001) Negative campaigning by US Senate candidates. Party Politics 7, 6987.
Lau, RR and Redlawsk, DP (1997) Voting correctly. American Political Science Review 91, 585598.
Lau, RR and Rovner, IB (2009) Negative campaigning. Annual Review of Political Science 12, 285306.
Mayer, WG (1996) In defense of negative campaigning. Political Science Quarterly 111, 437–55.
McLeod, JM, Glynn, CJ and McDonald, DG (1983) Issue and images: the influence of media reliance on voting decisions. Communication Research 10, 3758.
Meffert, MF, Chung, S, Joiner, AJ, Waks, L and Garst, J (2006) The effects of negativity and motivated information processing during a political campaign. Journal of Communication 56, 2751.
Müller, WC (2000) Political parties in parliamentary democracies: making delegation and accountability work. European Journal of Political Research 37, 309333.
Müller, WC and Strøm, K (1999) Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Patterson, TE and McClure, RD (1976) The Unseeing Eye: The Myth of Television Power in National Politics. New York: Putnam.
Petrocik, JR (1996) Issue ownership in Presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science 40, 825850.
Petrocik, JR, Benoit, WL and Hansen, GJ (2003) Issue ownership and Presidential campaigning, 1952–2000. Political Science Quarterly 118, 599626.
Ridout, TN and Franz, M (2008) Evaluating measures of campaign tone. Political Communication 25, 158179.
Ridout, TN and Mellen, R Jr. (2007) Does the media agenda reflect the candidates' agendas? International Journal of Press/Politics 12, 4462.
Ridout, TN and Walter, AS (2015) Party system change and negative campaigning in New Zealand. Party Politics 21, 982992.
Robins, G, Pattison, P, Kalish, Y and Lusher, D (2007) An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks 29, 173191.
Rydgren, J (2004) Explaining the emergence of radical right-wing populist parties: the case of Denmark. West European Politics 27, 474502.
Schultz, I (2007) The journalistic gut feeling. Journalism Practice 1, 190207.
Scott, TA (2016) Analyzing policy networks using valued exponential random graph models: do government-sponsored collaborative groups enhance organizational networks? Policy Studies 44, 215244.
Sellers, PJ (1998) Strategy and background in Congressional campaigns. American Political Science Review 92, 159171.
Semetko, HA and Valkenburg, PM (2000) Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication 50, 93109.
Semetko, HA, Blumler, JG, Gurevitch, M and Weaver, DH (1991) The Formation of Campaign Agendas: A Comparative Analysis of Party and Media Roles in Recent American and British Elections. New York: Routledge.
Shoemaker, PJ and Reese, SD (1991) Mediating the Message: Theories of Influence on Mass Media Content. New York: Longman.
Shoemaker, PJ, Eichholz, M, Kim, E and Wrigley, B (2001) Individual and routine forces in gatekeeping. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 78, 233246.
Song, H, Nyhuis, D and Boomgaarden, H (2017) A network model of negative campaigning: the structure and determinants of negative campaigning in multi-party systems. Communication Research 46, 273294.
Tuchman, G (1972) Objectivity as strategic ritual: an examination of newsmen's notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology 77, 660–79.
van Atteveldt, W (2008) Semantic Network Analysis: Techniques for Extracting, Representing, and Querying Media Content. Charleston: BookSurge.
van der Brug, W and Berkhout, J (2015) The effect of associative issue ownership on parties' presence in the news media. West European Politics 38, 869887.
van der Pas, DJ and Vliegenthart, R (2016) Do media respond to party conflict? Debates on European integration in British, Dutch and German party manifestos and newspapers, 1987–2006. Political Studies 64, 260278.
Walgrave, S, Lefevere, J and Tresch, A (2012) The associative dimension of issue ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly 76, 771782.
Walgrave, S, Camp, K van, Lefevere, J and Tresch, A (2016) Measuring issue ownership with survey questions: a question wording experiment. Electoral Studies 42, 290299.
Walter, AS (2013) Women on the battleground: does gender condition the use of negative campaigning? Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 23, 154176.
Walter, AS (2014a) Choosing the enemy: attack behaviour in a multi-party system. Party Politics 20, 311323.
Walter, AS (2014b) Negative campaigning in Western Europe: similar or different? Political Studies 62, 4260.
Walter, AS and Vliegenthart, R (2010) Negative campaigning across different communication channels: different ball games? International Journal of Press/Politics 15, 441461.
Wasserman, S and Pattison, P (1996) Logit models and logistic regression for social networks: I. An introduction to Markov graphs and p*. Psychometrika 61, 401425.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Nyhuis et al. supplementary material
Online Appendix

 PDF (2.8 MB)
2.8 MB

Disproportionality in media representations of campaign negativity

  • Dominic Nyhuis (a1), Hyunjin Song (a2) and Hajo Boomgaarden (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed