Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Following Through on an Intention to Vote: Present Bias and Turnout

  • Seth J. Hill (a1)
Abstract

Many citizens express an intention to vote but then fail to follow through on their motivation. It is well known that impulsiveness contributes to unsound behaviors with adverse individual consequences like smoking, overeating, and undersaving. I apply these findings and theory to political participation and argue that present bias is also likely to limit collective behaviors. Those who desire to act are challenged by impulsiveness in following through on their motivation. In a nationally representative survey merged to administrative records, those with present bias are around ten points less likely to vote. Importantly, those with present bias are less likely to vote even after expressing pre-election intention to do so. Along with a formal decision-theoretic model of turnout with present bias, the results provide a new framework to reason about the choice to vote, an alternative interpretation of the over-report of turnout, and have implications for policy approaches to promote individual action in the public interest.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email: sjhill@ucsd.edu
References
Hide All
Ainslie, G (1975) Specious Reward: A Behavioral Theory of Impulsiveness and Impulse Control. Psychological Bulletin 82(4), 463496.
Ali, SN (2011) Learning Self-Control. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126, 857893.
Ameriks, J, Caplin, A, Leahy, J Tyler, T (2007) Measuring Self-Control Problems. American Economic Review 97(3), 966972.
Angeletos, G-M, Laibson, D, Repetto, A, Tobacman, J Weinberg, S (2001) The Hyperbolic Consumption Model: Calibration, Simulation, and Empirical Evaluation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(3), 4768.
Ashraf, N, Karlan, D Yin, W (2006) Tying Odysseus to the Mast: Evidence from a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Economics 121(2), 635672.
Bisin, A, Lizzeri, A Yariv, L (2015) Government Policy with Time Inconsistent Voters. American Economic Review 105(6), 17111737.
Caldeira, GA Patterson, SC (1982) Contextual Influences on Participation in U.S. State Legislative Elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly 7(3), 359381.
Dawes, C Loewen, PJ (2018) “Behavioural Anomalies Explain Variation in Voter Turnout.” In Peter John Loewen and Daniel Rubenson (eds), Duty and Choice: The Evolution of the Study of Voting and Voters. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Denny, K Doyle, O (2008) Political Interest, Cognitive Ability and Personality: Determinants of Voter Turnout in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 38(2), 291310.
Fowler, JH Kam, CD (2006) Patience as a Political Virtue: Delayed Gratification and Turnout. Political Behavior 28, 113128.
Fraga, B Hersh, E (2010) Voting Costs and Voter Turnout in Competitive Elections. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5, 339356.
Freud, S (1956) Formulations on the Two Principles of Mental Functioning. In The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, eds J Strachey and A Freud. London: Hogarth.
Gerber, AS, Huber, GA Hill, SJ (2013) Identifying the Effects of All-Mail Elections on Turnout: Staggered Reform in the Evergreen State. Political Science Research and Methods 1(1), 91116.
Gerber, AS, Huber, GA, Doherty, D, Dowling, CM Hill, SJ (2013) Do Perceptions of Ballot Secrecy Influence Turnout? Results from a Field Experiment. American Journal of Political Science 57(3), 537551.
Green, DP, McGrath, MC Aronow, PM (2013) Field Experiments and the Study of Voter Turnout. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 23(1), 2748.
Holbein, JB (2017) Childhood Skill Development and Adult Political Participation. American Political Science Review 111(3), 572583.
Key, VO (1958) Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups. New York: Crowell.
Leighley, JE Nagler, J (2014) Who Votes Now? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Meier, S Sprenger, C (2010) Present-Biased Preferences and Credit Card Borrowing. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(1), 193210.
Meier, S Sprenger, CD (2015) Temporal Stability of Time Preferences. Review of Economics and Statistics 97(2), 273286.
Meredith, M (2009) Persistence in Political Participation. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4(3), 187209.
Panagopoulos, C (2013) Extrinsic Rewards, Intrinsic Motivation and Voting. Journal of Politics 75(1), 266280.
Samuelson, PA (1937) A Note on Measurement of Utility. Review of Economic Studies 4(2), 155161.
Thaler, RH (1981) Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency. Economics Letters 8(3), 201207.
Volpp, KG, Troxel, AB, Pauly, MV, Glick, HA, Puig, A, Asch, DA, Galvin, R, Zhu, J, Wan, F, DeGuzman, J, Corbett, E, Weiner, J Audrain-McGovern, J (2009) A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation. New England Journal of Medicine 360(7), 699709.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Political Science Research and Methods
  • ISSN: 2049-8470
  • EISSN: 2049-8489
  • URL: /core/journals/political-science-research-and-methods
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Hill Dataset
Dataset

 Unknown
PDF
Supplementary materials

Hill supplementary material
Hill supplementary material 1

 PDF (294 KB)
294 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed