Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:53:09.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do Women and Men Respond Differently to Negative News?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2016

Stuart Soroka ,
Elisabeth Gidengil ,
Patrick Fournier  and
Lilach Nir
Stuart Soroka
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Elisabeth Gidengil
Affiliation:
McGill University
Patrick Fournier
Affiliation:
University of Montreal
Lilach Nir
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article offers a new approach to studying sex differences in responses to negative news, using real-time physiological responses as opposed to self-reports. Measurements of skin conductance and heart rate are used to examine whether there are differences in the extent to which women and men are aroused by and attentive to negative news stories. Like experiments that have relied on postexposure self-reports, we detect no sex differences in arousal in response to negative news stories. However, in contrast to those experiments, we find indications that women are more attentive than men to negative news content. We consider possible reasons for this difference in findings. We also discuss neuropsychological studies that are consistent with our finding of greater attentiveness on the part of women to negative stimuli. Finally, we consider the relationship between our work and evidence in the literature that women consume less news than men.

Type
Thematic Issue: Women, Media, and Politics in a Comparative Perspective
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , June 2016 , pp. 344 - 368
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Althaus, Scott. 2003. Collective Preferences in Democratic Politics: Opinion Surveys and the Will of the People. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2003. “Not All Cues are Created Cqual: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” The Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1040–61.Google Scholar
Balzer, Amanda, and Jacobs, Carly M.. 2011. “Gender and Physiological Effects in Connecting Disgust to Political Preferences.” Social Science Quarterly 92 (5): 1297–313.Google Scholar
Benesch, Christine. 2012. “An Empirical Analysis of the Gender Gap in News Consumption.” Journal of Media Economics 25 (3): 147–67.Google Scholar
Bimber, Bruce. 1999. “The Internet and Citizen Communication with Government: Does the Medium Matter?” Political Communication 16 (4): 409–28.Google Scholar
Bolls, Paul D., Lang, Annie, and Potter, Robert F.. 1999. “The Effects of Message Valence and Listener Arousal on Attention, Memory, and Facial Muscular Responses to Radio Advertisements.” Communication Research 28 (5): 627–51.Google Scholar
Bradley, Margaret M., Codispoti, Maurizio, Sabatinelli, Dean, and Lang, Peter J.. 2001. “Emotion and Motivation II: Sex Differences in Picture Processing.” Emotion 1 (3): 300–19.Google Scholar
Brooks, Deborah Jordan. 2010. “A Negativity Gap? Voter Gender, Attack Politics, and Participation in American Elections.” Politics & Gender 6 (3): 319–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Verba, Sidney, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” The Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1051–72.Google Scholar
Canli, Turhan, Desmond, John E., Zhao, Zuo, and Gabrieli, John D. E.. 2002. “Sex Differences in the Neural Basis of Emotional Memories.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99 (16): 10789–795.Google Scholar
Croson, Rachel, and Gneezy, Uri. 2009. “Gender Differences in Preferences.” Journal of Economic Literature 47 (2): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daignault, Penelope, Soroka, Stuart, and Giasson, Thierry. 2013. “The Perception of Political Advertising During An Election Campaign: A Preliminary Study of Cognitive and Emotional Effects.” Canadian Journal of Communication 38 (2): 167–86.Google Scholar
Dawson, Michael, Schell, Anne, and Filion, Disan. 2007. “The Electrodermal System.” In Handbook of Psychophysiology, 3rd ed., ed. Cacioppo, John T., Tassinary, Louis G., and Berntson, Gary. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 2000. “Gender and Political Knowledge.” In Gender and American Politics: Women, Men, and the Political Process, ed. Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue and Josephson, Jyl J.. New York: M. E. Sharpe, 21–45.Google Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen. 2011. “Do Women and Men Know Different Things? Measuring Gender Differences in Political Knowledge.” The Journal of Politics 73 (1): 97–107.Google Scholar
Dow, Jay K. 2009. “Gender Differences in Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Characteristics-Based and Returns-Based Differences.” Political Behavior 31 (1): 117–36.Google Scholar
Economic and Social Research Council. 2013. “Women Worldwide Know Less about Politics than Men.” http://www.gold.ac.uk/news/pressrelease/?releaseID=1015 (accessed March 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Eveland, William P. Jr., and Scheufele, Dietram A.. 2000. “Connecting News Media Use With Gaps In Knowledge And Participation.” Political Communication 17 (3): 215–37.Google Scholar
Frazer, Elizabeth, and Macdonald, Kenneth. 2003. “Sex Differences in Political Knowledge in Britain.” Political Studies 51 (1): 67–83.Google Scholar
Gidengil, Elisabeth, Blais, André, Nevitte, Neil, and Nadeau, Richard. 2004. Citizens. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
Grabe, Maria Elizabeth. 2011. “News as Reality-Inducing, Survival-Relevant, and Gender-Specific Stimuli.” In Applied Evolutionary Psychology, ed. Roberts, S. Craig. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grabe, Maria Elizabeth, and Kamhawi, Rasha. 2006. “Hard Wired for Negative News? Gender Differences in Processing Broadcast News.” Communication Research 33 (5): 346–69.Google Scholar
Grabe, Maria Elizabeth, Zhou, Shuhua, Lang, Annie, and Bolls, Paul David. 2000. “Packaging Television News: The Effects of Tabloid on Information Processing and Evaluative Responses.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44 (4): 581–98.Google Scholar
Hannagan, Rebecca, Litvay, Levente, and Popa, Sebastian Adrian. 2014. “Theorizing Sex Differences in Political Knowledge: Insights from a Twin Study.” Politics & Gender 10 (1): 89–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harp, Dustin. 2008. “News, Feminist Theories, and the Gender Divide.” In Women, Men, and News: Divided and Disconnected in the News Media Landscape, ed. Poindexter, Paula, Meraz, Sharon, and Weiss, Amy Schmitz. New York: Routledge, 267–79.Google Scholar
Huma, Bogdana. 2010. “Gender Differences in Impression Formation.” Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology 1 (1): 57–72.Google Scholar
Ito, Tiffany A., and Cacioppo, John T.. 2005. “Variations on a Human Universal: Individual Differences in Positivity Offset and Negativity Bias.” Cognition and Emotion 19 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
Just, Marion R., Crigler, Ann N., and Neuman, W. Russell. 1996. “Cognitive and Affective Dimensions of Political Communication.” In Crigler, Ann N. (ed.), The Psychology of Political Communication. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press, 133–48.Google Scholar
Kamhawi, Rasha, and Grabe, Maria Elizabeth. 2008. “Engaging the Female Audience: An Evolutionary Psychology Perspective on Gendered Responses to News Valence Frames.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 52 (1): 33–51.Google Scholar
Kemp, Andrew H., Silberstein, Richard B., Armstrong, Stuart M., and Nathan, Pradeep J.. 2004. “Gender Differences in the Cortical Electrophysiological Processing of Visual Emotional Stimuli.” NeuroImage 16: 632–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, Montague, and Just, Marion. 1997. “A Gender Gap among Viewers?” In Women, Media, and Politics, ed. Norris, Pippa. New York: Oxford University Press, 99–112.Google Scholar
King, James D., and McConnell, Jason B.. 2003. “The Effect of Negative Campaign Advertising on Vote Choice: The Mediating Influence of Gender.” Social Science Quarterly 84 (4): 843–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleemans, Mariska, Vettehen, Paul G. J. Hendriks, Beentjes, Johannes W. J., and Eisinga, Rob. 2012. “The Influence of Age and Gender on Preferences for Negative Content and Tabloid Packaging in Television News Stories.” Communication Research 39 (5): 679–97.Google Scholar
Klein, Roger. 2003. “Audience Reactions to Local TV News.” American Behavioral Scientist 46 (21): 1661–72.Google Scholar
Klein, Sabine, Smolka, Michael N., Wrase, Jana, Gruesser, Sabine M., Mann, Karl, Braus, Dieter F. and Heinz, Andreas. 2003. “The Influence of Gender and Emotional Valence of Visual Cues on fMRI Activation in Humans.” Pharmacopsychiatry 36: S191–S194.Google ScholarPubMed
Lang, Annie. 1990. “Involuntary Attention and Physiological Arousal Evoked by Structural Features and Emotional Content in TV Commercials.” Communication Research 17 (3): 275–99.Google Scholar
Lang, Annie. 1994. “What Can the Heart Tell Us about Thinking?” In Measuring Psychological Responses to Media, ed. Lang, Annie, 99–112. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lang, Annie, Bolls, Paul, Potter, Robert F., and Kawahara, Karlynn. 1999. “The Effects of Production Pacing and Arousing Content on the Information Processing of Television Messages.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 43 (4): 451–75.Google Scholar
Lang, Annie, Newhagen, John, and Reeves, Byron. 1996. “Negative Video as Structure: Emotion, Attention, Capacity, and Memory.” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 40 (4): 460–77.Google Scholar
Lang, Annie, Zhou, Shuhua, Schwartz, Nancy, Bolls, Paul D., and Potter, Robert F.. 2000. “The Effects of Edits on Arousal, Attention, and Memory for Television Messages: When an Edit Is an Edit, Can an Edit Be Too Much?” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44 (1): 94–109.Google Scholar
Larsen, Randy J., and Diener, Edward. 1992. “Promises and Problems with the Circumplex Model of Emotion.” In Emotion: Review of Personality and Social Psychology, no. 13, ed., Clark, Margaret S.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 25–59.Google Scholar
Lemish, Dafna, and Alony, Rotem Pick. 2014. “The Gendered Nature of News Consumption by Children and Youth.” Journal of Audience and Reception Studies 11 (1): 174–98.Google Scholar
Lizotte, Mary-Kate, and Sidman, Andrew H.. 2009. “Explaining the Gender Gap in Political Knowledge.” Politics & Gender 5 (2): 127–51.Google Scholar
McClure, Erin B., Monk, Christopher S., Nelson, Eric E., Zarahn, Eric, Leibenluft, Ellen, Bilder, Robert M., Charney, Dennis S., Ernst, Monique, and Pine, Daniel S.. 2004. “A Developmental Examination of Sex Differences in Brain Engagement during Evaluation of Threat.” Biological Psychiatry 55 (11): 1047–55.Google Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2002. “Experimental Methods in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 31–61.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffrey J., and Anderson, Mary R.. 2004. “The Knowledge Gap: A Reexamination of Gender-Based Differences in Political Knowledge.” Journal of Politics 66 (2): 492–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, G., and Mulder, L.J.M.. 1981. “Information Processing and Cardiovascular Control.” Psychophysiology 18 (4): 392–402.Google Scholar
Newhagen, John E. 1998. “TV News Images that Induce Anger, Fear, and Disgust.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 42 (2): 265–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, Thomas E. 1994. Out of Order. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2002. Public's News Habits Little Changed by September 11. http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/156.pdf (accessed March 18, 2015).Google Scholar
The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2004. News Audiences Increasingly Politicized. http://www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/215.pdf (accessed March 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Poindexter, Paula, Meraz, Sharon, and Weiss, Amy Schmitz, eds. 2008. Women, Men, and News: Divided and Disconnected in the News Media Landscape, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Potter, Robert F., and Bolls, Paul D.. 2012. Psychophysiological Measurement and Meaning: Cognitive and Emotional Processing of Media. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rakow, Lana F., and Kranich, Kimberlie. 1991. “Women as Sign in Television News.” Journal of Communication 41 (1): 8–23.Google Scholar
Ravaja, Niklas. 2004. “Contributions of Psychophysiology to Media Research: Review and Recommendations.” Media Psychology 6 (2): 193–235.Google Scholar
Reeves, Byron, Lang, Annie, Kim, Eun Young, and Tatar, Deborah. 1999. “The Effects of Screen Size and Message Content on Attention and Arousal.” Media Psychology 1 (1): 49–67.Google Scholar
Reeves, Byron, and Nass, Clifford. 1996. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rohrmann Sonja, Henrik Hopp, and Quirin, Markus. 2008. “Gender Differences in Psychophysiological Responses to Disgust.” Journal of Psychophysiology 22 (2): 56–75.Google Scholar
Russell, James A. 1980. “A Circumplex Model of Affect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (6): 1161–78.Google Scholar
Schienle Anne, Axel Schäfer, Stark, Rudolf, Walter, Bertam, and Vaitl, Dieter. 2005. “Gender Differences in the Processing of Disgust and Fear-inducing Pictures: An fMRI Study.” Neuroreport 16 (3): 277–80.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, Pamela J. 1996. “Hardwired For News: Using Biological And Cultural Evolution To Explain The Surveillance Function.” Journal of Communication 46 (3): 32–47.Google Scholar
Simons, Robert F., Detenber, Benjamin H., Roedema, Thomas M., and Reiss, Jason E.. 1999. “Emotion Processing in Three Systems: The Medium and the Message.” Psychophysiology 36 (5): 619–27.Google Scholar
Smith, Kevin B., Oxley, Douglas, Hibbing, Matthew V., Alford, John R., and Hibbing, John R.. 2011. “Disgust Sensitivity and Neurophysiology of Left-Right Political Orientations.” Plos One 6 (10) e25552: 1–9.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart. 2014. Negativity in Democratic Politics: Causes and Consequences. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart, Nir, Lilach, and Fournier, Patrick. 2013. “Negativity Biases in Reactions to Network News: A Cross-National, Psychophysiological Pilot Study.” Presented at the Toronto Political Behaviour Workshop, Toronto.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart, and McAdams, Stephen. 2015. “News, Politics and Negativity.” Political Communication 32 (1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Stevens, Jennifer S., and Hamann, Stephan. 2012. “Sex Differences in Brain Activation to Emotional Stimuli: A Meta-Analysis of Neuroimaging Studies.” Neuropsychologia 50 (7): 1578–93.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind, and Gidengil, Elisabeth. 2010. “What Do Women Really Know? A Gendered Analysis of Varieties of Political Knowledge.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 93–109.Google Scholar
Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2008. “Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting The Concept of Selective Exposure.” Political Behavior 30 (3) : 341–66.Google Scholar
van Zoonen, Liesbet. 1998. “One of the Girls? The Incipient Feminization of News.” In News, Gender and Power , ed. Carter, Cynthia, Branston, Gill, and Allan, Stuart. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Viswanath, Kasisomayajula, and Finnegan, John R. Jr. 1996. “The Knowledge Gap Hypothesis: Twenty-Five Years Later.” In Communication Yearbook 19, ed. Burleson, Brant R.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 187–227.Google Scholar
Williams, Leanne M., Barton, Matthew J., Kemp, Andrew H., Liddell, Belinda J., Peduto, Anthony, Gordon, Evian, and Bryant, Richard A.. 2005. “Distinct Amygdala-Autonomic Arousal Profiles in Response to Fear Signals in Healthy Males and Females.” Neuroimage 28 (3): 618–26.Google Scholar
Wrase, Jana, Klein, Sabine, Gruesser, Sabine M., Hermann, Derik, Flor, Herta, Mann, Karl, Braus, Dieter F., and Heinz, Andreas. 2003. “Gender Differences in the Processing of Standardized Emotional Visual Stimuli in Humans: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.” Neuroscience Letters 348 (1): 41–45.Google Scholar