Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684bc48f8b-kbg4c Total loading time: 0.328 Render date: 2021-04-12T14:53:37.645Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Soccer Moms, Hockey Moms and the Question of “Transformative” Motherhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2010

Jill S. Greenlee
Affiliation:
Brandeis University

Abstract

From Dwight Eisenhower to John McCain, presidential candidates have appealed to female voters by highlighting motherhood in their campaigns. The most recent example of this has been the “hockey mom” trope introduced by the first hockey mom to earn a slot on the GOP presidential ticket, Governor Sarah Palin. These appeals, while motivated by political gamesmanship, imply that mothers see the political world a bit differently from other women. They suggest that women with children have different political priorities and concerns and, at times, different positions on political issues. This article takes this proposition seriously, and asks the question: Does becoming a mother have a transformative effect on women's political attitudes? Using longitudinal data from the four-wave 1965–97 Political Socialization Panel Study, I track the movement of women's political attitudes on partisan identification, ideological identification, and policy issues. I find that the effects of motherhood on women's political attitudes, while not uniform in nature, do push some women to adopt more conservative political attitudes. Thus, these results suggest that while motherhood does not transform women's political attitudes, for some women motherhood does promote interesting attitudinal shifts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Aldrich, John. and Nelson, Forrest. 1984. Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, R. C., and Baruch, G. K.. 1985. “Women's Involvement in Multiple Roles and Psychological Distress.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49 (1): 135–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beckwith, Karen. 2001. “Women's Movements at Century's End: Excavation and Advances in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 371–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsky, Jay. 1985. “Exploring Individual Differences in Marital Change across the Transition to Parenthood: The Role of Violated Expectations.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 47 (4): 1037–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, Chloe E. 1997. “Gender Differences in the Social and Economic Burdens of Parenting and Psychological Distress.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 59 (4): 809–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, Jake W. 2003. “The Dynamics of Political Participation in the Lives of Ordinary Americans.” Ph.D. diss. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J. 1999. “The Disempowerment of the Gender Gap: Soccer Moms and the 1996 Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (1): 711.Google Scholar
Carroll, Susan J.. 2008. “Security Moms and Presidential Politics: Women Voters in the 2004 Election.” In Voting the Gender Gap, ed. Lois, DukeWhitaker, Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The Reproduction of Mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis, Citrin, Jack, and Conley, Patricia 2001. “When Self-Interest Matters.” Political Psychology 22 (3): 541–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack, and Green, Donald Philip. 1990. “The Self-Interest Motive in American Public Opinion.” In Research in Micropolitics, vol 3, ed. Long, Samuel. Greenwich, NY: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston, and Sapiro, Virgina. 1993. “Gender, Feminist Consciousness, and War.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (4): 1079–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E., and Markus, Gregory B.. 1979. “Plus ça change …: The New CPS Election Study Panel.” American Political Science Review 73 (1): 3249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowan, C. P., and Cowan, P. A.. 1992. When Partners Become Parents: The Big Life Change for Couples. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Cramer Walsh, Kathy. 2004. Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice H., Diekman, Amanda, Johannesen-Schmidt, Mary, and Koenig, Anne. 2004. “Gender Gaps in Sociopolitical Attitudes: A Social Psychological Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (6): 796816.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elder, Laurel, and Greene, Steven. 2005. “Gender, Parenthood, and the Vote in the 2004 Elections.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Elder, Laurel, and Greene, Steven. 2007. “The Myth of ‘Security Moms’ and ‘NASCAR Dads’: Parenthood, Political Stereotypes, and the 2004 Election.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (1): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elder, Laurel, and Greene, Steven. 2008. “Parenthood and the Gender Gap.” In The Gender Gap: Voting and the Sexes, ed. Whitaker, Lois Duke. Champagne: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven. 1995. Causal Analysis with Panel Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage University Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Naomi, and Gerstel, Sally K.. 2001. “Men's Caregiving: Gender and the Contingent Character of Care.” Gender and Society 15 (2): 197217.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, Norvald D., and McLanahan, Sara. 1982. “Children and Marital Happiness: A Further Specification of the Relationship.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 44 (1): 6372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris-Lacewell, Melissa. 2004. Barbershops, Bibles, and BET: Everyday Talk and Black Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, Anna L. 1998. Votes without Leverage: Women in American Electoral Politics, 1920–1970. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howell, Susan E., and Day, Christine L.. 2000. “Complexities of the Gender Gap.” Journal of Politics 62 (3): 858–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, Jon, and Smithey, Shannon. 1998. “Gender Differences on Crime and Punishment.” Political Research Quarterly. 51 (1): 89115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishii-Kuntz, M., and Seccombe, K.. 1989. “The Impact of Children Upon Social Networks Throughout the Life Course.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51: 777–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, William. 1999. “Levels of Measurement and Political Research: An Optimistic View.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (1): 271301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, Falk, Erika, and Sherr, Susan. 1999. “The Enthymeme Gap in the 1996 Presidential Campaign.” PS, Political Science and Politics 32 (1): 1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Markus, Gregory B.. 1977. “The Effects of Military Service on Political Attitudes: A Panel Study.” American Political Science Review 71 (1): 131–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1981. Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent., Stoker, Laura, and Bowers, Jake. 1999. “Politics Across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” Paper prepared for presentation at the 1999 American Political Science Association Convention, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Jetter, Alexis, Orleck, Annelise, and Taylor, Diana, eds. 1997. The Politics of Motherhood: Activist Voices from Left to Right. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K. 1980. Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K.. 1995. “A Constitutional Right to Be Treated Like American Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship.” In U.S. History as Women's History: New Feminist Essays, ed. Kerber, Linda K., Kessler-Harris, Alice, and Sklar, Kathryn Kish. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Keyssar, Alexander. 2000. The Right to Vote: The Contested History of Democracy in the United States. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lemon, Stanley J. 1973. The Woman Citizen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lynn, Naomi B., and Flora, Cornelia B.. 1973Motherhood and Political Participation: The Changing Sense of Self.” Journal of Political and Military Sociology (Spring) 1: 91103.Google Scholar
McLanahan, Sara, and Adams, Julia. 1987. “Parenthood and Psychological Well-Being.” Annual Review of Sociology 13: 237–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meleis, A. I., Sawyer, L. M., Im, E. O., Messias, D. K. Hilfinger, and Schumacher, K.. 2000. “Experiencing Transitions: An Emerging Middle-Range Theory.” Advances in Nursing Science 23 (1): 1228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercer, Ramona. 2004. “Becoming a Mother Versus Maternal Role Attainment.” Journal of Nursing Scholarship 36 (3): 226–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcomb, Theodore, Kathryn Koenig, Richard Flacks, and Warwick, Donald. 1967. Persistence and Change: Bennington College and Its Students After Twenty-Five Years. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Nomaguchi, Kei M., and Milkie, Melissa A.. 2003. “Costs and Rewards of Children: The Effects of Becoming a Parent on Adults' Lives.” Journal of Marriage and Family 65: 356–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Gretchen. 2008. “Gender as a Category of Political Analysis.” In Political Women and American Democracy, ed. Christina Wolbrecht, Karen Beckwith, and Baldez, Lisa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1983. The Political Integration of Women: Roles, Socialization, and Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia.. 1994. “Political Socialization during Adulthood: Clarifying the Political Time of Our Lives.” Research in Micropolitics 4: 197223.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Citrin, Jack. 1985. Tax Revolt. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Funk, Carolyn L.. 1991. “The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. Zanna, Mark P.. New York: Academic Press, 280.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Levy, Sheri. 2003. “Childhood and Adult Political Development.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, ed. Sears, David O., Huddy, Leonie, and Jervis, Robert. New York: Oxford University Press, 60109.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Robert, and Mahajan, Harpreet. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (1): 4261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieber, Sam D. 1974. “Toward a Theory of Role Accumulation.” American Sociological Review 39 (4): 567–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigel, Roberta. 1989. “Introduction: Persistence and Change” In Political Learning in Adulthood, ed. Sigel, R. S.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 110.Google Scholar
Steckenrider, J. S., and Cutler, N. E.. 1989. “Aging and Adult Political Socialization.” In Political Learning in Adulthood, ed. Sigel, R. S.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 5688.Google Scholar
Stewart, Abigail. and Gold-Steinberg, Sharon. 1990. “Midlife Women's Political Consciousness: Case Studies in Psychosocial Development and Political Commitment.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 14 (4): 543–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Laura. 1993. “Judging Presidential Character: The Demise of Gary Hart.” Political Behavior 15 (2): 193223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Laura.. 1994. “A Reconsideration of Self-Interest in American Public Opinion.” Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association Conference, Abuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
Stoker, Laura, and Jennings, M. Kent. 1995. “Life-Cycle Transitions and Political Participation: The Case of Marriage.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 421–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Laura, and Jennings, M. Kent. 2005. “Political Similarity and Influence between Husbands and Wives.” In The Social Logic of Politics: Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, ed. Zuckerman, Alan S.. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Stoker, Laura, and Jennings, M. Kent. 2006. “Aging, Generations, and the Development of Partisan Polarization in the United States.” Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Umberson, Debra, and Gove, Walter. 1989. “Parenthood and Psychological Well-Being.” Journal of Family Issues 10 (4): 440–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, Herbert F. 1987. “The Demographics of a New Voting Gap: Marital Differences in American Voting”. Public Opinion Quarterly 51: 335–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 45
Total number of PDF views: 149 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Soccer Moms, Hockey Moms and the Question of “Transformative” Motherhood
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Soccer Moms, Hockey Moms and the Question of “Transformative” Motherhood
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Soccer Moms, Hockey Moms and the Question of “Transformative” Motherhood
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *