Skip to main content

The Practical Process of Gender Mainstreaming in the Political Science Curriculum

  • Amy L. Atchison (a1)

Although the presence of women in the political science profession has increased rapidly since the 1980s, women still constitute less than 30% of the political science faculty nationwide and are more likely to find themselves in lower-paying and/or nontenure track positions (APSA 2011, 39; Evans and Moulder 2011). In the discipline, the position of gender and politics as a legitimate course of study has improved markedly since the 1970s (Lovenduski 1998; Mackay 2004; Murphy 2010; Tolleson-Rinehart and Carroll 2006). As Childs and Krook (2006, 19) point out, “mainstream editors, publishers and conference conveners no longer feel able to ignore the work of feminist political scientists.” But they also present evidence that this improvement stops short of full incorporation into the discipline and note that there is still skepticism about the value of feminist scholarship. This skepticism is also present at the intersection of the profession and discipline: while there are no systematic data on the employment of gender and politics scholars, it is not rare for a gender and politics scholar to be told that her employment prospects would be better if she were to research something else (Childs and Krook 2006). Given the position of women in the profession and the status of gender and politics in the discipline, it is unsurprising that there is continued resistance to integrating gender into mainstream political science education (Baldez 2010; Lovenduski 2005; Murphy 2010).

Hide All
APSA. 2011. Political Science in the 21st Century: Report of the Task Force on Political Science in the 21st Century. (accessed February 8, 2012). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Baldez, Lisa. 2010. “The Gender Lacuna in Comparative Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 8 (1): 199205.
Bennett, Douglas C. 1991. “Political Science within the Liberal Arts: Towards Renewal of Our Commitment.” PS: Political Science & Politics 24 (2): 201–4.
Carpenter, Charli. 2007. “Introduction.” International Studies Perspectives 8 (3): 315–16.
Cassese, Erin C., and Bos, Angela L.. 2013. “A Hidden Curriculum? Examining the Gender Content in Introductory Level Political Science Textbooks.” Politics & Gender 9 (2): 214223
Cassese, Erin C., Bos, Angela L., and Duncan, Lauren E.. 2012. “Integrating Gender into the Political Science Core Curriculum.” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (2): 238–43.
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Gender and Politics: The State of the Art.” Politics 26 (1): 1828.
Colander, David, and Klamer, Arjo. 1987. “The Making of an Economist.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1 (2): 95111.
Dryzek, John S. 2006. “Revolutions Without Enemies: Key Transformations in Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 487–92.
Erevelles, Nirmala. 2005. “Understanding Curriculum as Normalizing Text: Disability Studies Meet Curriculum Theory.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 37 (4): 421–39.
Evans, Heather K., and Moulder, Ashley. 2011. “Reflecting on a Decade of Women's Publications in Four Top Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4): 793–98.
Fahey, Stephanie. 1988. “‘Putting Gender Into’ Geography.” Australian Geographical Studies 26 (1): 202–13.
Frueh, Jamie. 2007. “Teaching Complexity with Gender.” International Studies Perspectives 8 (3): 317–19.
Geller, Pamela L. 2009. “Identity and Difference: Complicating Gender in Archaeology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 38 (1): 6581.
Hendon, Julia. 2006. “Feminist Perspectives and the Teaching of Archaeology: Implications from the Inadvertent Ethnography of the Classroom.” In Feminist Anthropology: Past, Present, and Future, eds. Geller, Pamela L. and Stockett, Miranda K.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 129–42.
Ishiyama, John. 2005. “Examining the Impact of the Wahlke Report: Surveying the Structure of the Political Science Curricula at Liberal Arts and Sciences Colleges and Universities in the Midwest.” PS: Political Science & Politics 38 (1): 7175.
Ishiyama, John, Breuning, Marijke, and Lopez, Linda. 2006. “A Century of Continuity and (Little) Change in the Undergraduate Political Science Curriculum.” The American Political Science Review 100 (4): 659–65.
Kaufman-Osborn, Timothy V. 1991. “From the Science to the Art of Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics 24 (2): 204205.
Kotter, John P. 2007. “Leading Change.” Harvard Business Review 85 (1): 96103.
Kowalski, Robin M. 2000. “Including Gender, Race, and Ethnicity in Psychology Content Courses.” Teaching of Psychology 27 (1): 1824.
Lovenduski, Joni. 1998. “Gendering Research in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1): 333–56.
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity.
Mackay, Fiona. 2004. “Gender and Political Representation in the UK: The State of the ‘Discipline.’The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 6 (1): 99120.
McElhinny, Bonnie, Hols, Marijke, Holtzkener, Jeff, Unger, Susanne, and Hicks, Claire. 2003. “Gender, Publication and Citation in Sociolinguistics and Linguistic Anthropology: The Construction of a Scholarly Canon.” Language in Society 32 (3): 299328.
Mertus, Julie. 2007. “Teaching Gender in International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 8 (3): 323–25.
Morgen, Sandra, ed. 1989. Gender and Anthropology: Critical Reviews for Research and Teaching. Arlington, VA: American Anthropological Association.
Morgen, Sandra, and Moran, Mary. 1990. “Transforming Introductory Anthropology: The American Anthropological Association Project on Gender and the Curriculum.” Women's Studies Quarterly 18 (1/2): 95104.
Morley, Louise. 2007. “Sister-matic: Gender Mainstreaming in Higher Education.” Teaching in Higher Education 12 (5/6): 607–20.
Murphy, Kate. 2010. “Feminism and Political History.” Australian Journal of Politics & History 56 (1): 2137.
Shapiro, Judith. 1981. “Anthropology and the Study of Gender.” In A Feminist Perspective in the Academy: The Difference it Makes, eds. Langland, Elizabeth and Grove, Walter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 110–29.
Sjoberg, Laura. 2007. “Gender and Personal Pedagogy: Some Observations.” International Studies Perspectives 8 (3): 336–39.
Stegmaier, Mary, Palmer, Barbara, and Assendelft, Laura van. 2011. “Getting on the Board: The Presence of Women in Political Science Journal Editorial Positions.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4): 799804.
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue, and Carroll, Susan J.. 2006. “Far from Ideal: The Gender Politics of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 100 (4): 507–13.
Wahlke, John C. 1991. “Liberal Learning and the Political Science Major: A Report to the Profession.” PS: Political Science & Politics 24 (1): 4860.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 37 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 244 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.