Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Voting for Women in Belgium's Flexible List System

  • Sofie Marien (a1), Anke Schouteden (a2) and Bram Wauters (a2)

Proportional electoral systems tend to be more beneficial for women's descriptive representation than majority systems. However, within proportional systems the gender equality of election outcomes differs, highlighting the importance of studying the actual use of electoral provisions in proportional representation (PR) systems. Therefore, we investigate the determinants of voting for female candidates in Belgium's local elections. This case is particularly interesting given the equal number of men and women on the candidate lists due to quota regulations, the possibility to cast multiple preference votes (lowering competition), and the high visibility of these local elections and its candidates. At the individual level, we find that women are more likely than men to vote for several women, yet same-sex voting is more common among men. Politically sophisticated respondents vote more often for candidates of both sexes. Against our expectations, a left-wing orientation does not increase the likelihood of voting for women. At the electoral district level, a larger supply of women at the top list position increases the chance to vote for this top woman, but there is no spillover effect to women lower on the list. District magnitude affects the number of preference votes but, against expectations, not the likelihood of voting for women.

Hide All
AlexanderAmy C. 2012. “Change in Women's Descriptive Representation and the Belief in Women's Ability to Govern: A Virtuous Cycle.” Politics & Gender 8 (4): 437–64.
AndréAudrey, Wauters Bram, and Pilet Jean-Benoit. 2012. “It's Not Only about Lists. Explaining Preference Voting in Belgium.” Journal of Elections, Parties and Public Opinion 22 (3): 293313.
Ballmer-CaoThanh-Huyen, and Tremblay Manon. 2008. “Modes de scrutin, partis politiques et élection des femmes: une introduction.” Swiss Political Science Review 14 (4): 609–33.
BanducciSusan A., and Karp Jeffrey A.. 2000. “Gender, Leadership and Choice in Multiparty Systems.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (4): 818–48.
BorisyukGalina, Rallings Colin, and Thrasher Michael. 2007. “Women in English Local Government, 1973–2003: Getting Selected, Getting Elected.” Contemporary Politics 13 (2): 181–99.
BriansCraig L. 2005. “Women for Women? Gender and Party Bias in Voting for Female Candidates.” American Politics Research 33 (3): 357–75.
CaluwaertsDidier, Erzeel Silvia, and Meier Petra. 2013. “Is it Male Chauvinism or Political Apathy? Gender-Based Preferential Voting in Belgium.” Presented at the 3rd European Conference on Politics and Gender, Barcelona.
CartonAnn. 1998. “Over de actie ‘stem vrouw’ en de plaats van de vrouw in de politiek.” In De (on)redelijke kiezer. Onderzoek naar de politieke opvattingen van Vlamingen: verkiezingen van 21 mei 1995, ed. Swyngedouw Mark, Billiet Jaak, Carton Ann, and Beerten Roeland. Leuven: Acco, 2749.
CaulMiki. 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 7999.
CelisKaren, and Meier Petra. 2006. De macht van het geslacht. Leuven: Acco.
CookElizabeth A. 1994. “Voter Responses to Women Senate Candidates.” In The Year of the Woman: Myths and Realities, ed. Cook Elizabeth A., Thomas Sue, and Wilcox Clyde. Boulder: Westview Press.
CutlerFred. 2002. “The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice.” Journal of Politics 64 (2): 466–90.
DahlerupDrude. 2007. “Electoral Gender Quotas, Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result.” Representation 43 (2): 7392.
DassonnevilleRuth, Marien Sofie, and Hooghe Marc. 2012. PARTIREP Exit Poll 2012 Technical Report. Leuven: Centre for Political Science Research KU Leuven.
de MoorJoost, Marien Sofie, and Hooghe Marc. 2013. “Won't You Be My Number Two? De invloed van genderquota op het rekruteringsproces van vrouwelijke burgemeesters in het Vlaams Gewest van België (2012).” Res Publica 55 (3): 303–20.
DeschouwerKris. 2009. The Politics of Belgium. London: Palgrave.
DolanKathleen. 1998. “Voting for Women in ‘Year of the Woman.’” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 272–93.
DolanKathleen. 2008. “Is There a ‘Gender Affinity Effect’ in American Politics? Information, Affect, and Candidate Sex in U.S. House Election.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1): 7989.
ErzeelSilvia. 2012. “Presence Theory and Beyond. An Empirical Study of Legislators’ Acting on Behalf of Women in European Democracies.” Ph.D. diss. Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
GeysBenny, and Heyndels Bruno. 2003. “Influence of Cognitive Sophistication on Ballot Layout Effects.” Acta Politica 38 (4): 295311.
GigerNathalie, Holli Anne-Marie, Lefkofridi Zoe, and Wass Hanna. 2014The Gender Gap in Same-Gender Voting: The Role of Context.” Electoral Studies 35 (3): 303–14.
Goodyear-GrantElizabeth, and Croskill Julie. 2011. “Gender Affinity Effects in Vote Choice in Westminster Systems: Assessing ‘Flexible’ Voters in Canada.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 223–50.
GurinPatricia, Miller Arthur H., and Gurin Gerald. 1980. “Stratum Identification and Consciousness.” Social Psychology Quarterly 43 (1): 3047.
HabermasJürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity.
HeathAnothony, McLean Iain, Taylor Bridgat, and Curtice John. 1999. “Between First and Second Order: A Comparison of Voting Behaviour in European and Local Elections in Britain.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (3): 389414.
HolliAnne-Marie, and Wass Hanna. 2010. “Gender-Based Voting in the Parliamentary Elections of 2007 in Finland.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (5): 598630.
HoxJoop J. 2010. Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications. New York: Routledge.
KenworthyLane, and Malami Melissa. 1999. “Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis.” Social Forces 78 (1): 235–68.
KingDavid C., and Matland Richard E.. 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31 (6): 595612.
LefevereJonas. 2013. “Zijn lokale verkiezingen tweederangsverkiezingen?” In De Lokale Kiezer. Het kiesgedrag bij de Belgische gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van oktober 2012, ed. Dassonneville Ruth, Hooghe Marc, Marien Sofie, and Pilet Jean-Benoit. Brussels: ASP Publishers, 93116.
LeijenaarMonique. 2004. “Een vrouwvriendelijk kiessysteem”. In Vrouwen vertegenwoordigd, Wetstraat gekraakt? Representativiteit feministisch bekeken, ed. Meier Petra and Celis Karen Brussels: VUBPress, 4980.
LuskinRobert C. 1990. “Explaining Political Sophistication.” Political Behavior 12 (4): 331–61.
LutzGeorge. 2010. “First Come, First Served: The Effect of Ballot Position on Electoral Success in Open Ballot PR Elections.” Representation 46 (2): 167–81.
MansbridgeJane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women?Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
MarienSofie, Dassonneville Ruth, and Hooghe Marc. 2015. “How Second Order Are Local Elections? Voting Motives and Party Preferences in Belgian Municipal ElectionsLocal Government Studies 41 (6): 898916.
MarissalClaudine, and Hansen Ingrid. 2001. Op weg naar de paritaire democratie. Analyse van de gemeente- en provincieraadsverkiezingen van 8 oktober 2000. Brussel: Federaal Ministerie van Tewerkstelling en Arbeid–Directie van de gelijke kansen.
MarshMichael, and Sinnott Richard. 2008. Irish National Election Study 2002–2007. Data Description and Documentation. Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.
MatlandRichard E. 1994. “Putting Scandinavian Equality to the Test: An Experimental Evaluation of Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates in a Sample of Norwegian Voters.” British Journal of Political Science 24 (2): 273–92.
MatlandRichard E., and Montgomery Kathleen A., eds. 2003. Women's Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
MatlandRichard E., and Studlar Donley T.. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single and Multimember District Systems: Canada and Norway.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 707–33.
McDermottMonika L. 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.
McDermottMonika L. 2009. “Voting for Myself: Candidate and Voter Group Associations over Time.” Electoral Studies 28 (4): 606–14.
McElroyGail, and Marsh Michael. 2010. “Candidate Gender and Voter Choice: Analysis from a Multimember Preferential Voting System.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (4): 822–33.
McElroyGail, and Marsh Michael. 2011. “Electing Women to the Dáil: Gender Cues and the Irish Voter.” Irish Political Studies 26 (4): 521–34.
MeierPetra. 2004. “The Mutual Contagion Effect of Legal and Party Quotas. A Belgian Perspective.” Party Politics 10 (5): 583600.
NorrisPippa. 1996. “Legislative Recruitment.” In Comparing Democracies. Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, ed. LeDuc Lawrence, Niemi Richard G., and Norris Pippa. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 184215.
PaolinoPhillip. 1995. “Group-Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 294313.
PaxtonPamela, Kunovich Sheri, and Hughes Melanie M.. 2007. “Gender in Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 263–84.
PhillipsAnne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
PlutzerEric, and Zipp John F.. 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1): 3057.
SanbonmatsuKira. 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 2034.
Schwindt-BayerLeslie A. 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85.
SmithEric R.A.N., and Fox Richard L.. 2001. “The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 205–21.
StudlarDonley T., and McAllister Ian. 2002. “Does a Critical Mass Exist? A Comparative Analysis of Women's Legislative Representation Since 1950.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (2): 233–53.
ThomasSue. 1998. “Introduction.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present and Future, ed. Thomas Sue and Wilcox Clyde. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 114.
TremblayManon, ed. 2008. Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
WautersBram. 2000. De kracht van de voorkeurstem in stad en dorp. Een analyse bij de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van 1994 in Vlaanderen. Leuven: Afdeling Politologie.
WautersBram, Weekers Karolien, and Maddens Bart. 2010. “Explaining the Number of Preferential Votes for Women in an Open List-PR System: The 2003 Federal Elections in Flanders (Belgium).” Acta Politica 45 (4): 468–90.
WautersBram, Verlet Dries, and Ackaert Johan. 2012. “Giving More Weight to Preferential Votes: Welcome or Superfluous Reform? The Case of the Local Elections in Flanders (Belgium).” Local Government Studies 38 (1): 91111.
WayenbergEllen, De Rynck Filip, Steyvers Kristof, and Pilet Jean-Benoit. 2010. “Belgium: A Tale of Regional Divergence.” In The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe, ed. Hendriks Frank, Lindström Anders, and Loughlin John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 7195.
WolbrechtChristina, and, Campbell David. 2007. “Leading by Example. Female Members of Parliament as Political Role Models.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 921–39.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Marien supplementary material
Abstract and Appendix

 Word (46 KB)
46 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 66 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 529 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.