Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Voting for Women in Belgium's Flexible List System

  • Sofie Marien (a1), Anke Schouteden (a2) and Bram Wauters (a2)
Abstract

Proportional electoral systems tend to be more beneficial for women's descriptive representation than majority systems. However, within proportional systems the gender equality of election outcomes differs, highlighting the importance of studying the actual use of electoral provisions in proportional representation (PR) systems. Therefore, we investigate the determinants of voting for female candidates in Belgium's local elections. This case is particularly interesting given the equal number of men and women on the candidate lists due to quota regulations, the possibility to cast multiple preference votes (lowering competition), and the high visibility of these local elections and its candidates. At the individual level, we find that women are more likely than men to vote for several women, yet same-sex voting is more common among men. Politically sophisticated respondents vote more often for candidates of both sexes. Against our expectations, a left-wing orientation does not increase the likelihood of voting for women. At the electoral district level, a larger supply of women at the top list position increases the chance to vote for this top woman, but there is no spillover effect to women lower on the list. District magnitude affects the number of preference votes but, against expectations, not the likelihood of voting for women.

Proportional electoral systems tend to be more beneficial for women's descriptive representation than majority systems. However, within proportional systems the gender equality of election outcomes differs, highlighting the importance of studying the actual use of electoral provisions in proportional representation (PR) systems. Therefore, we investigate the determinants of voting for female candidates in Belgium's local elections. This case is particularly interesting given the equal number of men and women on the candidate lists due to quota regulations, the possibility to cast multiple preference votes (lowering competition), and the high visibility of these local elections and its candidates. At the individual level, we find that women are more likely than men to vote for several women, yet same-sex voting is more common among men. Politically sophisticated respondents vote more often for candidates of both sexes. Against our expectations, a left-wing orientation does not increase the likelihood of voting for women. At the electoral district level, a larger supply of women at the top list position increases the chance to vote for this top woman, but there is no spillover effect to women lower on the list. District magnitude affects the number of preference votes but, against expectations, not the likelihood of voting for women.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Amy C. Alexander 2012. “Change in Women's Descriptive Representation and the Belief in Women's Ability to Govern: A Virtuous Cycle.” Politics & Gender 8 (4): 437–64.

Audrey André , Bram Wauters , and Jean-Benoit Pilet . 2012. “It's Not Only about Lists. Explaining Preference Voting in Belgium.” Journal of Elections, Parties and Public Opinion 22 (3): 293313.

Thanh-Huyen Ballmer-Cao , and Manon Tremblay . 2008. “Modes de scrutin, partis politiques et élection des femmes: une introduction.” Swiss Political Science Review 14 (4): 609–33.

Susan A. Banducci , and Jeffrey A. Karp . 2000. “Gender, Leadership and Choice in Multiparty Systems.” Political Research Quarterly 53 (4): 818–48.

Galina Borisyuk , Colin Rallings , and Michael Thrasher . 2007. “Women in English Local Government, 1973–2003: Getting Selected, Getting Elected.” Contemporary Politics 13 (2): 181–99.

Craig L. Brians 2005. “Women for Women? Gender and Party Bias in Voting for Female Candidates.” American Politics Research 33 (3): 357–75.

Miki Caul . 1999. “Women's Representation in Parliament: The Role of Political Parties.” Party Politics 5 (1): 7999.

Fred Cutler . 2002. “The Simplest Shortcut of All: Sociodemographic Characteristics and Electoral Choice.” Journal of Politics 64 (2): 466–90.

Drude Dahlerup . 2007. “Electoral Gender Quotas, Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result.” Representation 43 (2): 7392.

Kathleen Dolan . 1998. “Voting for Women in ‘Year of the Woman.’” American Journal of Political Science 42 (1): 272–93.

Kathleen Dolan . 2008. “Is There a ‘Gender Affinity Effect’ in American Politics? Information, Affect, and Candidate Sex in U.S. House Election.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (1): 7989.

Benny Geys , and Bruno Heyndels . 2003. “Influence of Cognitive Sophistication on Ballot Layout Effects.” Acta Politica 38 (4): 295311.

Nathalie Giger , Anne-Marie Holli , Zoe Lefkofridi , and Hanna Wass . 2014The Gender Gap in Same-Gender Voting: The Role of Context.” Electoral Studies 35 (3): 303–14.

Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant , and Julie Croskill . 2011. “Gender Affinity Effects in Vote Choice in Westminster Systems: Assessing ‘Flexible’ Voters in Canada.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 223–50.

Patricia Gurin , Arthur H. Miller , and Gerald Gurin . 1980. “Stratum Identification and Consciousness.” Social Psychology Quarterly 43 (1): 3047.

Anothony Heath , Iain McLean , Bridgat Taylor , and John Curtice . 1999. “Between First and Second Order: A Comparison of Voting Behaviour in European and Local Elections in Britain.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (3): 389414.

Anne-Marie Holli , and Hanna Wass . 2010. “Gender-Based Voting in the Parliamentary Elections of 2007 in Finland.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (5): 598630.

Lane Kenworthy , and Melissa Malami . 1999. “Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A Worldwide Comparative Analysis.” Social Forces 78 (1): 235–68.

David C. King , and Richard E. Matland . 2003. “Sex and the Grand Old Party: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Candidate Sex on Support for a Republican Candidate.” American Politics Research 31 (6): 595612.

Robert C. Luskin 1990. “Explaining Political Sophistication.” Political Behavior 12 (4): 331–61.

George Lutz . 2010. “First Come, First Served: The Effect of Ballot Position on Electoral Success in Open Ballot PR Elections.” Representation 46 (2): 167–81.

Jane Mansbridge . 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women?Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.

Sofie Marien , Ruth Dassonneville , and Marc Hooghe . 2015. “How Second Order Are Local Elections? Voting Motives and Party Preferences in Belgian Municipal ElectionsLocal Government Studies 41 (6): 898916.

Richard E. Matland 1994. “Putting Scandinavian Equality to the Test: An Experimental Evaluation of Gender Stereotyping of Political Candidates in a Sample of Norwegian Voters.” British Journal of Political Science 24 (2): 273–92.

Richard E. Matland , and Kathleen A. Montgomery , eds. 2003. Women's Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.

Richard E. Matland , and Donley T. Studlar . 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single and Multimember District Systems: Canada and Norway.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 707–33.

Monika L. McDermott 1997. “Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections: Candidate Gender as a Social Information Variable in Contemporary United States Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 270–83.

Monika L. McDermott 2009. “Voting for Myself: Candidate and Voter Group Associations over Time.” Electoral Studies 28 (4): 606–14.

Gail McElroy , and Michael Marsh . 2010. “Candidate Gender and Voter Choice: Analysis from a Multimember Preferential Voting System.” Political Research Quarterly 63 (4): 822–33.

Gail McElroy , and Michael Marsh . 2011. “Electing Women to the Dáil: Gender Cues and the Irish Voter.” Irish Political Studies 26 (4): 521–34.

Petra Meier . 2004. “The Mutual Contagion Effect of Legal and Party Quotas. A Belgian Perspective.” Party Politics 10 (5): 583600.

Phillip Paolino . 1995. “Group-Salient Issues and Group Representation: Support for Women Candidates in the 1992 Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 39: 294313.

Pamela Paxton , Sheri Kunovich , and Melanie M. Hughes . 2007. “Gender in Politics.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 263–84.

Eric Plutzer , and John F. Zipp . 1996. “Identity Politics, Partisanship and Voting for Women Candidates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60 (1): 3057.

Kira Sanbonmatsu . 2002. “Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (1): 2034.

Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer 2006. “Still Supermadres? Gender and the Policy Priorities of Latin American Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 570–85.

Eric R.A.N. Smith , and Richard L. Fox . 2001. “The Electoral Fortunes of Women Candidates for Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 205–21.

Donley T. Studlar , and Ian McAllister . 2002. “Does a Critical Mass Exist? A Comparative Analysis of Women's Legislative Representation Since 1950.” European Journal of Political Research 41 (2): 233–53.

Manon Tremblay , ed. 2008. Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Bram Wauters , Karolien Weekers , and Bart Maddens . 2010. “Explaining the Number of Preferential Votes for Women in an Open List-PR System: The 2003 Federal Elections in Flanders (Belgium).” Acta Politica 45 (4): 468–90.

Bram Wauters , Dries Verlet , and Johan Ackaert . 2012. “Giving More Weight to Preferential Votes: Welcome or Superfluous Reform? The Case of the Local Elections in Flanders (Belgium).” Local Government Studies 38 (1): 91111.

Christina Wolbrecht , and, David Campbell . 2007. “Leading by Example. Female Members of Parliament as Political Role Models.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 921–39.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics & Gender
  • ISSN: 1743-923X
  • EISSN: 1743-9248
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-gender
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Marien supplementary material
Abstract and Appendix

 Word (46 KB)
46 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 10
Total number of PDF views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 299 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.