Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-5zjcf Total loading time: 0.37 Render date: 2022-08-12T01:59:40.863Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Secularism, Religion, and Political Choice in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2013

T. Randolph Beard*
Affiliation:
Auburn University
Robert B. Ekelund Jr.
Affiliation:
Auburn University
George S. Ford
Affiliation:
Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies
Ben Gaskins
Affiliation:
Gardner-Webb University
Robert D. Tollison
Affiliation:
Clemson University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: T. Randolph Beard, Department of Economics, Auburn University, Auburn University, AL 36849-5049. E-mail: beardtr@auburn.edu

Abstract

The effect of religion on political behavior and attachment has been a topic of intense interest in the United States and elsewhere. Less attention has been paid to the issue of secularism. Some analysts have viewed secularism as an absence of religious attachment, and a number of studies have utilized indices of secularization to analyze such topics as economic development or modernization. In this article, we show that secularism, like religion, is in fact a multifaceted category, and should not be viewed as the antithesis of religiosity. Utilizing a very large sample of United States adults, we apply factor analysis to demonstrate that secularism is composed of two logically separate components, and we use these results to examine the role of secularism in political attachments. We suggest that Religious Secularism and Social Secularism are different motivations and have different effects on political behavior and that, politically, the marginal effects of Social Secularism are larger than Religious Secularism in all cases.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, Joseph O., and Smith, Buster G.. 2009. “The Nones: Social Characteristics of the Religiously Unaffilitated.” Social Forces 87:12511263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, David C., and Carman, Christopher J.. 2000. “The Spirit of Capitalism? Religious Doctrine, Values, and Economic Attitude Constructs.” Political Behavior 22:127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyerlein, Kraig, and Chaves, Mark. 2003. “The Political Activities of Congregations in the United States.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42:229246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonner, Hypatia Bradlaugh, and Robertson, John M.. 1894 [2009]. Charles Bradlaugh: A Record of his Life with an Account of his Parliamentary Struggle, Life and Teachings. Cornell, NY: Cornell University Library.Google Scholar
Bord, Richard J., and Faulkner, Joseph E.. 1975. “Religiosity and Secular Attitudes: The Case of Catholic Pentecostals.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 14:257270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Gilbert, Christopher P.. 2009. The Political Influence of Churches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Djupe, Paul A., and Grant, J. Tobin. 2001. “Religious Institutions and Political Participation in America.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 40:303314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubray, Charles. 1912. “Secularism.” In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York, NY: Robert Appleton Company. http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/1367s.htm (Accessed on December 6, 2009).Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel, and Pope, Jeremy. 2010. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Fowler, Robert Booth, Hertzke, Allen D., Olson, Laura R., and den Dulk, Kevin R.. 2010. Religion and Politics in America: Faith, Culture, and Strategic Choices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Georgellis, Yannis, and Lange, Thomas. 2011. “Traditional vs. Secular Values and Work–Life Well Being across Europe.” British Journal of Management (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Green, John C., Guth, James L., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Smidt, Corwin E.. 1996. Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front. London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Guth, James L., Green, John C., Schmidt, Corwin E., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Poloma, Margaret M.. 1997. The Bully Pulpit: The Politics of Protestant Clergy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Hansen, Susan 2011. Religion and Reaction: The Secular Political Challenge to the Religious Right. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Holyoake, George J. 1896. The Origin and Nature of Secularism. London: Watts and Co.Google Scholar
Hout, Michael, and Fischer, Claude S.. 2002. “Why more Americans have no Religious Preference: Politics and Generations.” American Sociological Review 67:165190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humlum, M.K., Kleinjans, K.J., and Neilson, H.S.. 2012. “An Economic Analysis of Identity and Career Choice.” Economic Inquiry.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, James Davison. 1991. Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Baker, Wayne E.. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review 65:1951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald, and Welzel, Christian. 2005. Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelen, Ted. 1991. The Political Mobilization of Religious Beliefs. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Karen M. 2004. “The Partisan Paradox: Religious Commitment and the Gender Gap in Party Identification.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68:491511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellstedt, Lyman, and Green, John C.. 1993. “Knowing God's many people: Denominational preference and political behavior.” In Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics, eds. Leege, David C., and Kellstedt, Lyman A.. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 5371.Google Scholar
Kellstedt, Lyman, Green, John, Guth, James, and Smidt, Corwin. 1996. “Grasping the Essentials: The Social Embodiment of Religion and Political Behavior.” In Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front, eds. Green, John, Guth, James, Smidt, Corwin, and Kellstedt, Lyman. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 174192.Google Scholar
Kohut, Andrew, Green, John C., Keeter, Scott, and Toth, Robert C.. 2000. The Diminishing Divide: Religion's Changing Role in American Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Kosmin, Barry A., and Keysar, Ariela. 2008. American Nones: The Profile of the No Religion Population (A Report Based on the American Religious Identification Survey 2008). Hartford, CT: Trinity College. http://www.trincoll.edu/Academics/AcademicResources/Values/ISSSC/archive.htm (Accessed on February 21, 2013)Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey. 1997. “Religion and Political Behavior in the United States: The Impact of Beliefs, Affiliations, and Commitment from 1980 to 1994.” Public Opinion Quarterly 61:228316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Li, Liman Man Wai, and Bond, Michael H.. 2010. “Analyzing National Change in Citizen Secularism across Four Time Periods in the World Values Survey.” World Values Research. www.worldvaluessurvey.org (Accessed on February 21, 2013).Google Scholar
Lim, Chaeyoon, MacGregor, Carol Ann, and Putnam, Robert D.. 2010. “Secular and Liminal: Discovering Heterogeneity among Religious Nones.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 49:596618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. Scott, and Freese, Jeremy. 2005. Regression Models for Categorical Outcomes Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Manly, B. F. J. 1994. “Factor analysis” In BFJ, Manly, ed. Multivariate statistical methods. A Primer. London: Chapman & Hall, 93106.Google Scholar
Moreno-Riano, Gerson, Smith, Mark Caleb, and Mach, Tomas. 2006. “Title of article here.”Journal of Religion & Society 8:110.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Karl. 1901. “Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution, X: Supplement to a memoir on skew variation.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character 197:443459.Google Scholar
Pew Forum Faith Angle Conference. 2007. “Religion and Secularism: The American Experience.” http://pewforum.org/events/?EventID=161 (Accessed on February 21, 2013).Google Scholar
Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. 2008. U.S. Religious Landscape Survey. http://pewforum.org/datasets/ (Accessed on February 21, 2013).Google Scholar
Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. 2009a. “Faith in Flux: Changes in Religious Affiliation in the U.S. (April) Pew Research Center.” http://pewforum.org/Faith-in-Flux.aspx (Accessed on February 21, 2013).Google Scholar
Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. 2009b. “Eastern, New Age Beliefs Widespread: Many Americans Mix Multiple Faiths.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. 2010. “Religion among the Millennials.” Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., and Campbell, David E.. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Skrondal, Anders, and Laake, Peter. 2001. “Regression among Factor Scores.” Psychometrika 66:563575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smidt, Corwin E., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Guth, James L.. 2009. “The Role of Religion in American Politics: Explanatory Theories and Associated Analytical and Measurement Issues.” In The Oxford Handbook of Religion and American Politics, eds. Smidt, Corwin E., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Guth, James L.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 342.Google Scholar
Sommerville, C.J. 1998. “Secular Society Religious Population: Our Tacit Rules for Using the Term Secularization. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 37:249253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay L., and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Volunteerism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., and Calhoun-Brown, Allison. 2011. Religion and Politics in the United States. 6th ed.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D., Owen, Dennis E., and Hill, Samuel S.. 1988. “Churches as Political Communities.” American Political Science Review 82:531548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuthnow, Robert. 1988. The Restructuring of American Religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
20
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Secularism, Religion, and Political Choice in the United States
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Secularism, Religion, and Political Choice in the United States
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Secularism, Religion, and Political Choice in the United States
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *