Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T12:06:55.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contesting Values and Searching for “Rules” in the Anglican Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2011

John Anderson
John Anderson*
Affiliation:
University of St. Andrews
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: John Anderson, University of St. Andrews, School of International Relations, Library Park, The Scores, St Andrews, Fife, Scotland, KY16 9AX. E-mail: jpa@st-and.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over the last decade the 80-million strong Anglican Communion has been increasingly divided, seemingly over the issue of sexuality. This article explores this conflict by focusing on the particular problems of resolving conflict when the divisions are a product of a growing ethical pluralism within the Church and the wider society. In particular, we locate the discussion within an emerging debate about the utility of “rules” in resolving conflict in an international community where cultural particularity challenges claims made for universal values. In the Anglican case, hope has been vested in a Covenant that is discussed in the second part of this article. The hope of Church leaders was that this particular set of rules would acquire not just formal consent but normative legitimacy, although by early 2010 it was far from clear that this had resolved the crisis.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , December 2011 , pp. 428 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anglican Communion Covenant. 2010. http://www.anglicancommunion.org/commission/covenant/final/text.cfm (Accessed on January 8, 2010).Google Scholar
Archbishop of Canterbury. 2006. “The Challenge and Hope of Being an Anglican Today: A Reflection for the Bishops, Clergy and Faithful of the Anglican Communion.” http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/640 (Accessed on April 27, 2009).Google Scholar
Archbishop of Canterbury. 2008. “Archbishop of Canterbury Responds to GAFCON.” http://www.archbishopofcanterbury.org/1871 (Accessed on August 5, 2008).Google Scholar
Butler, J. 2007. Born Again: The Christian Right Globalized. London, UK: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, I. 2005. “An American Report on the Windsor Report.” Journal of Anglican Studies 3:155–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, I., and Zahl, P. 2005. Understanding the Windsor Report: Two Leaders in the American Church Speak Across the Divide. New York, NY: Church Publishing.Google Scholar
Douglas, I. 2007. “A feast for All People.” Address to York Diocesan Clergy Conference, 2 May 2007.Google Scholar
Duncan, R. 2008. “Anglicanism Come of Age: A Post-Colonial and Global Communion for the 21st Century.” http://www.acn-us.org/etc/2008/anglicanism-come-of-age.pdf (Accessed on April 25, 2009).Google Scholar
Gagnon, R. 2003. The Bible and Homosexual Practice: Text and Hermeneutics. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.Google Scholar
Harbour, F. V. 1995. “Basic Moral Values: A Shared Core.” Ethics & International Affairs 9:155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassett, M. 2007. Anglican Communion in Crisis: How Episcopal Dissidents and their African Allies are Reshaping Anglicanism. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Jenkins, P. 2002. The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Jerusalem Declaration. 2008. http://fca.net/decstat.html (Accessed on April 25, 2009).Google Scholar
Kaye, B. 2007. “High Speed Conflict and Anglican Identity.” Journal of Anglican Studies 5:3135–3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, B. 2008. An Introduction to World Anglicanism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lambeth Conference 1998 Archives. 1998. http://www.lambethconference.org/1998/news/lc076.cfm (Accessed on November 13, 2008).Google Scholar
Klabbers, J. 2006. “The Meaning of Rules.” International Relations 20:295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A., Rengger, N., and Walker, W.. 2006. “The Role(s) of Rules: Some Conceptual Clarifications.” International Relations 20:274–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linzey, A., and Kirker, R., eds. 2005. Gays and the Future of Anglicanism: Responses to the Windsor Report. Winchester, NY: O BooksGoogle Scholar
Norris, P., and Inglehart, R.. 2004. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Forum. 2007. “Global Schism: Is the Anglican Communion Rift the First Stage in a Wider Christian Split.” http://pewforum.org/events/?EventID=145 (Accessed on April 21, 2009).Google Scholar
Proud, A. 2008. “The Crisis Today: Split Identities, Divided Loyalties.” http://www.dioceseofegypt.org/english/?q=node/28 (Accessed on April 28, 2009, but no longer accessible at that address).Google Scholar
Pui-Lan, K. 2001. “The Legacy of Cultural Hegemony in the Anglican Church.” In Beyond Colonial Anglicanism, eds. Douglas, Ian T., and Pui-lan, Kwok. New York, NY: Church Publishing.Google Scholar
Radner, E. 2008. “Truthful Language and Orderly Separation.” Anglican Communion Institute, http://www.anglicancommunioninstitute.com/2008/09/truthful-language-and-orderly-separation (Accessed on June 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Radner, E. 2009a. “The ACNA Constitution: In Line with the Covenant? http://www.fulcrum-anglican.org.uk/page.cfm?ID=378 (Accessed on June 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Radner, E. 2009b. “An open letter to the Covenant Design Group.” http://www.anglicancommunioninstitute.com/2009/01/the-baptism-of-our-lord (Accessed on June 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Response to Resolution ACC14.11. 2009. “The Anglican Communion Covenant by the Executive Council of the Episcopal Church.” http://www.episcopalchurch.org/documents/Ridley_Cambridge_Draft_response.pdf (Accessed on January 5, 2010).Google Scholar
Ridley-Cambridge Draft of the Anglican Covenant. 2009. http://www.anglicancommunion.org/commission/covenant/ridley_cambridge/draft_text.cfm (Accessed on November 7, 2009).Google Scholar
Sachs, W. 1993. The Transformation of Anglicanism: From State Church to Global Communion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. 2008. “Approaching Lambeth.” http://www.edinburgh.anglican.org/media/downloads/bishop_17_jun_08.pdf (Accessed on April 27, 2009).Google Scholar
Turner, P., Seitz, C., and Radner, E.. 2009. “Patient Endurance — On Living Faithfully in a Time of Troubles.” http://www.anglicancommunioninstitute.com/2009/01/patient-endurance-on-living-faithfully-in-a-time-of-troubles (Accessed on June 5, 2009).Google Scholar
Ward, K. 2006. A History of Global Anglicanism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windsor Report 2004. 2004, http://www.anglicancommunion.org/windsor2004 (Accessed on June 5, 2008).Google Scholar
Wijsen, F., and Schreiter, R., eds. 2007. Global Christianity: Contested Claims. New York, NY: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar