Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Diyanet as a Turkish Foreign Policy Tool: Evidence from the Netherlands and Bulgaria

  • Ahmet Erdi Öztürk (a1) and Semiha Sözeri (a2)
Abstract

How does Turkey's Presidency of Religious Affairs (Diyanet) act as an instrument of foreign policy (FP)? What are the factors that allow such an instrumentalization of Islam in Turkish FP? In addressing these questions, this paper uses semi-structured expert interviews from Bulgaria and the Netherlands. Although both countries host a sizeable Muslim minority, these populations differ in their characteristics and historical ties with Turkey. Comparing Diyanet’s role in the Netherlands with its recent Turkish-Muslim diaspora, and in Bulgaria with its centuries-old Muslim minority allows us to reveal variation in the practical engagement strategies that Diyanet adopts in different country contexts. Thus, this paper advances two main claims; first, Diyanet serves as a primary FP tool of Turkey in countries with a significant Turkish-Muslim minority. Secondly, this instrumentalization destabilizes secularization projects both at home and abroad.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Diyanet as a Turkish Foreign Policy Tool: Evidence from the Netherlands and Bulgaria
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Diyanet as a Turkish Foreign Policy Tool: Evidence from the Netherlands and Bulgaria
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Diyanet as a Turkish Foreign Policy Tool: Evidence from the Netherlands and Bulgaria
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Ahmet Erdi Öztürk, University of Strasbourg, France. E-mail: aerdiozturk@gmail.com
References
Hide All
Akgönül, Samim. 2005. Religions de Turquie, Religions des Turcs: Nouveaux Acteurs dans l'Europe Élargie. Paris: L'Harmattan.
Althusser, Louis. 2014. On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. London: Verso Books.
Ammerman, Nancy T. 2003. “Religious Identities and Religious Institutions.” In Handbook of the Sociology of Religion, eds. Dillon, Michele. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 207224.
Amstutz, Mark R. 2013. Evangelicals and American Foreign Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bardakoglu, Ali. 2004. “‘Moderate Perception of Islam’ and the Turkish Model of the Diyanet: The President's Statement.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 24:367374.
Baser, Bahar, and Öztürk, Ahmet Erdi. 2017. “In Lieu of an Introduction: Is it Curtains for Turkish Democracy?” In Authoritarian Politics in Turkey: Elections, Resistance and the AKP, eds. Baser, Bahar and Öztürk, Ahmet Erdi. London: IB Tauris, 120.
Ben-Porat, Guy. 2013. Between State and Synagogue: The Secularization of Contemporary Israel. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.
Berger, Maurizio. 2014. “The Netherlands.” In Oxford Handbook of European Islam, ed. Cesari, Jocelyne. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 180.
Binswanger, Karl, and Sipahioğlu, Fethi. 1988. Türkisch-islamische Vereine als Faktor Deutsch-türkischer Koexistenz [Turkish-Islamic Associations as a Factor in the German-Dutch Coexistence]. Vol. 75. München: Rieß.
Bruce, Benjamin. 2015. Governing islam abroad: the Turkish and Moroccan Muslim fields in France and Germany. Doctoral Dissertation. Paris: Institut D'études Politiques.
Cheng, Tun-jen, and Brown, Deborah A.. 2006. “Introduction: The Roles of Religious Organizations in Asian Democratization.” In Religious Organizations and Democratization: Case Studies from Contemporary Asia, eds. Cheng, Tun-jen, and Brown, Deborah A.. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 340.
Çitak, Zana. 2010. “Between ‘Turkish Islam’ and ‘French Islam’: The Role of the Diyanet in the Conseil Français du Culte Musulman.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 36:619634.
Constitution of the Republic of Turkey. 1982. “Turkish Grand National Assembly.” https://global.tbmm.gov.tr/docs/constitution_en.pdf (Accessed July 1, 2017).
Davutoğlu, Ahmet. 2001. Stratejik Derinlik. Istanbul: Küre Yayınları.
Finke, Roger, and Stark, Rodney. 1992. The Churching of America, 1776–1990: Winners and Losers in Our Religious Economy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Fitzgerald, Scott T. 2017. “Conceptualizing and Understanding the Gülen Movement.” Sociology Compass 11(3):110.
Ghaly, Mohammed M. 2008. “The Academic Training of Imams: Recent Discussions and Initiatives in the Netherlands.” In The Study of Religion and Training of Muslim Clergy in Europe, eds. Drees, Willem B., and van Koningsveld, Pieter Sjoerd. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 379386.
Ghose, Gauvav, and James, Patrick. 2005. “Third-party Intervention in Ethno-religious Conflict: Role Theory, Pakistan, and War in Kashmir, 1965.” Terrorism and Political Violence 17(3):427445.
Gill, Anthony. 2008. Rendering unto Caesar: The Catholic Church and the State in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gill, Anthony, and Keshavarzian, Arang. 1999. “State Building and Religious Resources: An Institutional Theory of Church-State Relations in Iran and Mexico.” Politics & Society 27(3):431465.
Global Economy Data. 2013. Bulgaria: Muslims as Percent of the Total Population. http://www.theglobaleconomy.com/Bulgaria/muslim/ (Accessed July 4, 2017).
Gözaydın, Ịstar B. 2008. “Diyanet and Politics.” The Muslim World 98:216227.
Gurses, Mehmet. 2015. “Is Islam a Cure for Ethnic Conflict? Evidence from Turkey.” Politics and Religion 8(1):135154.
Gurses, Mehmet, and Rost, Nicolas. 2017. “Religion as a Peacemaker? Peace Duration After Ethnic Civil Wars.” Politics and Religion 10:339362.
Haynes, Jeffrey. 2009. “Transnational Religious Actors and International Order.” Perspectives 17:4369.
Hendrick, Joshua D. 2013. Gülen: The Ambiguous Politics of Market Islam in Turkey and the World. New York: NYU Press.
Inboden, William. 2008. Religion and American Foreign Policy, 1945–1960: The Soul of Containment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
James, Carolyn C., and Özdamar, Özgür. 2005. “Religion as a Factor in Ethnic Conflict: Kashmir and Indian Foreign Policy.” Terrorism and Political Violence 17(3):447467.
Johansen, Brigitte Shepelern. 2006. Islam at the European Universities: Report II. Research Priority area “Religion in the 21st Century”. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 1996. The Rise of Christian Democracy in Europe. New York: Cornell University Press.
Keyman, E. Fuat. 2007. “Modernity, Secularism and Islam: The Case of Turkey.” Theory, Culture & Society 24:215234.
Marsden, Lee. 2014. “Faith-based Diplomacy: Conservative Evangelicals and the United States Military.” Politics and Religion 7(3):475498.
Meuleman, Johan. 2012. “Educating for an Old Profession in a New Context: The Imam Training Programme of Inholland University, the Netherlands.” In The Training of Imams and Teachers for Islamic Education in Europe, eds. Aslan, Ednan, and Windisch, Zsofia. Frankfurt: EBSCO Publishing: E-book Collection, 233.
Ozkan, Behlül. 2014. “Turkey, Davutoglu and the Idea of Pan-Islamism.” Survival 56:119140.
Öztürk, Ahmet Erdi. 2016. “Turkey's Diyanet under AKP Rule: From Protector to Imposer of State Ideology?Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16:619635.
Philpott, Daniel. 2004. “The Catholic Wave.” Journal of Democracy 15(2):3246.
Philpott, Daniel. 2007. “Explaining the Political Ambivalence of Religion.” American Political Science Review 101:505525.
Popov, Radko. 2013. “Islam in Modern Bulgaria: 1878 to Present.” Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe 33(2):16. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol33/iss2/1/ (Accessed July 4, 2017).
Sandal, Nukhet Ahu. 2011. “Religious Actors as Epistemic Communities in Conflict Transformation: The Cases of South Africa and Northern Ireland.” Review of International Studies 37(3):929949.
Sandal, Nukhet, and Fox, Jonathan. 2013. Religion in International Relations Theory: Interactions and Possibilities. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Sözen, Ahmet. 2010. “A Paradigm Shift in Turkish Foreign Policy: Transition and Challenges.” Turkish Studies 11:103123.
Stepan, Alfred, and Linz, Juan J.. 2013. “Democratization Theory and the “Arab Spring”.” Journal of Democracy 24(2):1530.
Sunier, Thijl, and Landman, Nico. 2015. Transnational Turkish Islam. Shifting Geographies of Religious Activism and Community Building in Turkey and Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sunier, Thijl, van der Linden, Heleen, and van de Bovenkamp, Ellen. 2016. “The Long Arm of the State? Transnationalism, Islam and Nation-building: The Case of Turkey and Morocco.” Contemporary Islam 10(3):401420.
Warner, Carolyn M., and Walker, Stephen G.. 2011. “Thinking About the Role of Religion in Foreign Policy: A Framework for Analysis.” Foreign Policy Analysis 7(1):113135.
Warner, R. Stephen. 2000. “Religion and New (Post-1965) Immigrants: Some Principles Drawn from Field Research.” American Studies 41(2/3):267286.
Wiktorowicz, Quintan, ed. 2004. Islamic Activism: A Social Movement Theory Approach. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Yavuz, M. Hakan. 1997. “Turkish-Israeli Relations through the Lens of the Turkish Identity Debate.” Journal of Palestine Studies 27:2237.
Yavuz, M. Hakan. 2016. “Social and Intellectual Origins of Neo-Ottomanism: Searching for a Post-National Vision.” Die Welt des Islams 56:438465.
Yukleyen, Ahmet. 2009. “Localizing Islam in Europe: religious activism among Turkish Islamic organizations in the Netherlands.” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 29(3):291309.
Zürcher, Erik J. 2004. Turkey: A Modern History. London: IB Tauris.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Politics and Religion
  • ISSN: 1755-0483
  • EISSN: 1755-0491
  • URL: /core/journals/politics-and-religion
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed