Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-x59qb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T08:02:06.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Faith-based Organizations and Welfare State Retrenchment in Sweden: Substitute or Complement?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2012

Charlotte Fridolfsson  and
Ingemar Elander
Charlotte Fridolfsson*
Affiliation:
Linköping University
Ingemar Elander*
Affiliation:
Örebro University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Ingemar Elander, Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Örebro University, Fakultetsgatan 1, SE- 701 82 Örebro, Sweden. E-mail: ingemar.elander@oru.se; or to Charlotte Fridolfsson, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Campus Valla, SE- 581 83 Linköping. Sweden. E-mail: charlotte.fridolfsson@liu.se
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Ingemar Elander, Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Örebro University, Fakultetsgatan 1, SE- 701 82 Örebro, Sweden. E-mail: ingemar.elander@oru.se; or to Charlotte Fridolfsson, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Campus Valla, SE- 581 83 Linköping. Sweden. E-mail: charlotte.fridolfsson@liu.se
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Local governments in Europe are facing difficulties in meeting citizens' demands for welfare provision. This opens new opportunities for profit as well as non-profit providers of social welfare. Faith-based organizations (FBOs) are one type of non-governmental organizations addressed by governments to complement or replace parts of public welfare provision. This article gives some examples of FBOs in action as providers of welfare in a European context, with a particular focus on Sweden. Following the introduction, the second part locates the phenomenon of FBOs within the scholarly debate about secularism/post-secularism as related to multi-level governance. The third part gives an overview of potential roles of FBOs in welfare provision combating poverty and social exclusion, illustrated by a few examples from European contexts. Focus in the fourth part is upon the role of FBO engagement in Sweden as developing after World War II. It is concluded that no system is all encompassing in catering to those who suffer from poverty and social exclusion. There will always be a need for the competence and avant-garde role potentially provided by FBOs. However, due to historical circumstances FBOs in Sweden have been, and still are, complementary rather than an outright alternative to public welfare provision.

Type
Articles
Information
Politics and Religion , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , December 2012 , pp. 634 - 654
Copyright
Copyright © Religion and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agreement. 2008. “Agreement between the Swedish Government, National Idea-Based Organizations in the Social Sphere and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions.” http://www.overenskommelsen.se/pdf/agreementsocialvolsector.pdf (Accessed on August 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Andersen, Hans Thor. 2008. “The Emerging Danish Government Reform – Centralised Decentralisation.” Urban Research & Practice 1:3–17.Google Scholar
Andersson, Eric. 2010. “Interview.” Filadelfia, Stockholm, 5 May.Google Scholar
Bache, Ian, and Flinders, Matthew, eds. 2004. Multi-level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bäckström, Anders, and Davie, Grace. 2009. “A Preliminary Conclusion: Gathering the Threads and Moving On.” In Welfare and Religion in 21st Century Europe: Volume 1. Configuring the Connections, eds., Bäckström, Anders, and Davie, Grace. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Bazant, Ursula, and Schubert, Klaus. 2009. “European Welfare systems: Diversity Beyond Existing Categories.” In The Handbook of European Welfare Systems, eds., Schubert, Klaus, Hegelich, Simon, and Bazant, Ursula. London: Routledge, pp. 513–534.Google Scholar
Bergqvist, Christina, ed. 1999. Equal Democracies? Gender and Politics in the Nordic Countries. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
Brink, Josefin, Ergon, Jens, Gustavsson, Peter, and Werne, Kent. 2009. Sälj hela skiten!: eller hur privatiseringarna raserar den gemensamma välfärden (Sell All that Shit!: Or, How Privatizations Demolish the Common Welfare). Stockholm: Oxford.Google Scholar
Christian Council of Sweden. 2010a. “Påskuppropet (The Easter Call).” http://www.skr.org/temp_paskupprop05_intro.htm (Accessed on May 10, 2010).Google Scholar
Christian Council of Sweden. 2010b. “Öppet brev från SKR:s styrelse till regeringen om de utförsäkrades situation (Open Letter from the Christian Council of Sweden Governing Board to the Government Regarding the Situation of People who have been Xxpelled from the Insurance System).” http://www.skr.org/arkiv/pressarkiv/oppetbrevfranskrsstyrelsetillregeringenomdeutforsakradessituation.5.57a5b5b812e52e4174680009208.html (Accessed on May 10, 2010).Google Scholar
Church of Sweden. 2010. “Facts about the Church of Sweden.” http://www.svenskakyrkan.se (Accessed on January 1, 2010).Google Scholar
Cloke, Paul, Williams, Andrew, and Thomas, Samuel. 2009. “FBOs and Social Exclusion in the United Kingdom.” In Faith-based Organisations and Social Exclusion in European Cities. National Context Reports, eds., Dierckx, Daniellt, Vranken, Jan, and Kerstens, Wedny. Leuven/Den Haag: Acco, pp. 283–342.Google Scholar
Cnaan, Ram. 2006. The Other Philadelphia Story: How Local Congregations Support Quality of Life in Urban America. Philadelphia, PA: Penn Press.Google Scholar
Dagens, Nyheter (Daily News). 2011a. “Caremas ökande vinster hamnar i skatteparadis - Skandalen i äldrevården. Kostnadsjakt går före kvalitet (Carema's Rising Profits Land in Tax Paradise - The Scandal in Elderly Care. Chasing Costs more Important than Quality)” November 9, Section 1, pp. 32–33.Google Scholar
Dagens, Nyheter (Daily News). 2011b. “Trendbrott i Sverige — fler kommer hit för att arbeta (Trend Break in Sweden — More People Arriving for Work).” November 23, Section 1, p. 23.Google Scholar
Dierckx, Danielle, Vranken, Jan, and Kerstens, Wendy, eds. 2009. Faith-based Organisations and Social Exclusion in European Cities. National Context Reports. Leuven/Den Haag: Acco.Google Scholar
ECAS. 2010. “European Citizen Action Service: Enabling Your Voice to be Heard with EU.” http://www.ecas-citizens.eu/content/view/173/205 (Accessed on March 11, 2010).Google Scholar
Elander, Ingemar, and Fridolfsson, Charlotte. 2011. Faith-based Organisations and Social Exclusion in Sweden. Leuven/Den Haag: Acco.Google Scholar
Elander, Ingemar, and Montin, Stig. 1990. Decentralization and Control: Central-local Government Relations in Sweden.” Policy and Politics 18:165–180.Google Scholar
Enarsson, Henrik. 2009. “Interview.” Göteborgs kyrkliga stadsmission, Göteborg, 18 March.Google Scholar
ETC. 2010. “Örebrokvinnor tar mer makt (Örebro Women Seize More Power).” Örebro, 14 February.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, Jürgen, and Kloeckner, Jennifer. 2009. “FBOs and Social Exclusion in Germany.” In Faith-based Organisations and Social Exclusion in European Cities, eds., Dierckx, Danielle, Vranken, Jan, and Kerstens, Wendy, eds. Leuven/Den Haag: Acco.Google Scholar
Gallup. 2009. “What Alabamians and Iranians Have in Common.” http://www.gallup.com (Accessed on February 2, 2010).Google Scholar
Government Bill 2009/2010, Number 55. Politik för Civilsamhället (Policy for Civil Society). http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/12163/a/136226 (Accessed on September 18, 2012).Google Scholar
Granberg, Gunnar. 2011. Stora kyrkor och små församlingar. Nytänkande med idéer om framtiden (Big Churches and Small Congregations. Thinking New with Ideas about the Future). Uppsala: Votum.Google Scholar
Granberg, Mikael. 2008. “Local Governance 'in Swedish'? Globalisation, Local Welfare Government and Beyond.” Local Government Studies 34:363–377.Google Scholar
Günes-Ayata, Ayse. 2008. “Challenges of Global Migration. EU and its Neighbourhood. Glomig Project Conference Proceedings.” Ankara: METU and KORA.Google Scholar
Hjalmarsson, Elisabet. 2009. “Interview.” Uppsala: Central Office Swedish Church, 18 February.Google Scholar
Jeavons, Thomas H. 2004. “Religious and Faith-Based Organizations: Do We Know One When We See One?” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33:140–145.Google Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina & Nesbitt-Larking, Paul. 2011. The Political Psychology of Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kokx, Anita, and Van Kempen, Ronald. 2010. “Dutch Urban Governance: Multi-level or Multi-scalar?” European Urban and Regional Studies 17:355–369.Google Scholar
Kommun 2009. “Örebro Kommuns interreligiösa/interkulturella råd (Örebro Municipality's Inter-Religious/Inter-Culural Committé).” (Accessed on June 18, 2009).Google Scholar
Kosmin, Barry A. & Keysar, Ariela, eds. 2007 Secularism & Secularity. Contemporary International Perspectives. Hartford, CT: Institute for the Study of Secularizations in Society and Culture.Google Scholar
Kyhlström, Anette. 2009. “Interview.” The Whole Person/Healing the Man (Hela Människan) Stockholm, 20 March.Google Scholar
Liljeblad, Elin. 2005. Begreppet onormalt lågt anbud i direktiv 2004/18/EG om offentlig upphandling: Om begreppets innebörd och konsekvenserna av att det saknas förbud mot att anta onormalt låga anbud (The concept of abnormally low tender and the directive 2004/18/EC on public procurement: About the significance of the concept of abnormally low tender, and consequences of the lack of prohibitive legislation). http://liu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:20610 (Accessed on September 18, 2011).Google Scholar
Livskraft. 2006. “Bättre kunskap krävs för bra asylbeslut (Better Knowledge Needed for Better Decisions in Asylum Matters).” No 3.Google Scholar
Markovits, Marika. 2009. “Interview.” Stockholm City Mission (Stockholms stadsmission) 15 April, 2009.Google Scholar
Migrationsverket. 2010. “Migration 2000–2010.” http://www.migrationsverket.se/info/start_en.html (Accessed on September 28, 2010).Google Scholar
Molendijk, Ariel L., Beaumont, Justin, and Jedan, Christoph. 2010. Exploring the Postsecular. The Religious, the Political and the Urban. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Monsma, Stephen V. 2004. Putting Faith in Partnerships. Welfare-to-Work in Four Cities. MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Inglehart, Ronald. 2004. Sacred and Secular. Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olsson, Lars-Erik, Nordfeldt, Marie, Larsson, Ola, and Kendall, Jeremy. 2009. “Sweden: When Strong Sector Historical Roots Meet EU Policy Processes.” In: Handbook on Third Sector Policy in Europe and Organised Civil Society, ed., Kendall, Jeremy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 159–183.Google Scholar
Överenskommelsen (The Agreement). 2009. http://overenskommelsen.se/uppfoljning/anslutna-organisationer (Accessed on August 3, 2010).Google Scholar
Pickel, Gert & Müller, Olaf. 2009. “Introduction — The Comparative Empirical View on Religion and Religiosity.” In Church and Religion in Contemporary Europe. Results from Empirical and Comparative Research, eds., Gert, Pickel, and Müller, Olaf. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
Qviström, David, Ed. 2005. Välgrundad fruktan. Om asyl, amnesti och rätten till trygghet. (Well Motivated Fear. On Asylum, Amesty and the Right to Security) Örebro: Cordia.Google Scholar
Redlund, Pia. 2009. “Interview.” Social Mission, Stockholm (Sociala Missionen) 23 February.Google Scholar
Rittersberger-Tilic, Helga, Erdemir, Aykan, Ergun, Ayca, and Kahveci, Hayriye, eds. 2008. “Rethinking Global Migration: Practices, politicies, and discources in the European Neighbourhood.” Glomig Project Conference Proceedings. Ankara: METU and KORA.Google Scholar
Salah, Abdallah. 2009. “Cross-Evaluation.” Stockholm Mosque, 14 September.Google Scholar
Schartau, Mai-Brith. 2010. Caritas — en organisation i förändring (Caritas — An Organization in Transformation). Stockholm: Södertörn.Google Scholar
Schubert, Klaus, Hegelich, Simon, and Bazant, Ursula, eds. 2009a. The Handbook of European Welfare Systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schubert, Klaus, Hegelich, Simon, and Bazant, Ursula. 2009b. “European Welfare Systems: Current State of Research and Some Theoretical Considerations.” In The Handbook of European Welfare Systems, eds., Schubert, Klaus, Hegelich, Simon, and Bazant, Ursula. London: Routledge, pp. 3–28.Google Scholar
Sellers, Jefferey M & Lidström, Anders. 2007. “Decentralization, Local Government and the Welfare State.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 204: 609–632.Google Scholar
Sen, Mustafa, Aksular, Arda Deniz & Samur, Zelal Ozdemir. 2009. “FBOs and Social Exclusion in Turkey.” In Faith-based Organisations and Social Exclusion in European cities, eds., Dierckx, Danielle, Vranken, Jan, and Kerstens, Wendy. Leuven/Den Haag: Acco.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Laurence James. 1988. “The Growth and Decentralization of the Modern Democratic State.” European Journal of Politicakl Research 16:365–380.Google Scholar
SST. 2010. “Nämnden för Statligt Stöd till Trossamfund (Swedish Commission for Government Support to Faith Communities).” http://www.sst.a.se (Accessed on August 26, 2010).Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Utbildningsradion. 2011. Muslimer iSverige (Muslims in Sweden). http://www.ur.se/Ung/Amnen/SO/Religion/Islam/Islam-i-Sverige (Accessed on August 7, 2011.Google Scholar
Wallin, Örjan. 2009. “Interview.” Hela Människan, Stockholm (The Whole Person/Healing the Person), 20 March.Google Scholar
Walliser, Andres & Bartolomé, Vera. 2009. “FBOs and Social Exclusion in Spain.” In Faith-based Organisations and Social Exclusion in European Cities, eds., Dierckx, Danielle, Vranken, Jan, and Kerstens, Wendy. Leuven/Den Haag: Acco.Google Scholar
Werne, Kent. 2010. “Jackpot i vård. Miljarder i vinst när välfärden privatiseras (Jackpot in Care. Billion Profits When Welfare is Privatized).” Ordfront Magasin 2010:12–16.Google Scholar