No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Articles and Commentaries
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Politics and the Life Sciences
References
Allen, Garland E. (1978). Thomas Hunt Morgan. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arms Control and Disarmament Agreements (1980). Washington, D.C.: Arms Control and Disarmament Agency.Google Scholar
Aspin, L. (1979). “The Verification of the SALT II Agreement.” Scientific American 240:38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of American Universities (1982). Report on the Ethical Considerations Arising from University-Industry Interests. Contained in a letter to Representatives Don Fuqua and Albert Gore, U.S. Congress, October 28.Google Scholar
Bacon, Francis (1902). Novum Organum. Vol. I. New York: American Home Library Company.Google Scholar
Baryoan, O. (1975). [Dangers of Genetic Engineering Discussed]. Literaturnaya Gazeta, February 26:13–16.Google Scholar
Berg, Paul et al. (1974). “Potential Biohazards of Recombinant DNA Molecules.” Science 185:303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biotechnology Newswatch (1982). “Working Group Weighs U.S. Technology Transfer Abroad.” 2:1.Google Scholar
Bull, A. T., Holt, G., and Lilly, M. D. (1982). Biotechnology: International Trends and Perspectives. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.Google Scholar
Cama, H. R. (1980). “Biochemistry in India.” Trends in the Biochemical Sciences. 5:iv–vii.Google Scholar
Carlucci, Frank (1982). “Letter from Deputy Secretary of Defense Carlucci to William Carey.” Science 215:139–141.Google Scholar
Chemical and Engineering News (1982). “FDA Okays Marketing of Human Insulin.” 60:5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colwell, R. R. (1983). “A World Network for Environmental, Applied, and Biotechnological Research.” ASM News 49(2):72–73.Google Scholar
Davies, T.D. (1980). Statement to the Congressional Hearing on “Strategic Implications of Chemical and Biological Warfare,” April 24, 1980.Google Scholar
Department of Defense (1981). Soviet Military Power. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Department of State (1974). International Scientific Cooperation—A Summary of Tangible Benefits. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Ellwell, L. P., and Shipley, P. L. (1980). “Plasmid-mediated Factors Associated with Virulence of Bacteria to Animals.” Annual Review of Microbiology 34:465–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emejuaiwe, S. O., Ogunbi, O., and Sanni, S. O. (1981). Global Impacts of Applied Microbiology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
European Economic Community (1980). Biotechnology: Europe's Newest Natural Resource. Background Report SEC (B41).Google Scholar
Franke, Richard W. (1974). “Miracle Seeds and Shattered Dreams in Java.” Natural History 23:88–103.Google Scholar
Giamatti, A. B. (1982) “The University, Industry, and Cooperative Research.” Science 218:1095.Google Scholar
Goodrich, R. (1982). Biotechnology in Brazil. Contractor's Report submitted to the Office of Technology Assessment.Google Scholar
Hersh, Seymour M. (1969). Chemical and Biological Warfare: America's Hidden Arsenal. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Inman, B. R. (1982). “National Security and Technical Information.” Speech to the meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Judson, Horace Freeland (1972). The Eighth Day of Creation. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Krause, R.(forthcoming). “Is the Biological Revolution a Match for the Trinity of Despair?” In Biotechnology: Impact on Societal Institutions, a series of issues of Technology in Society, edited by Perpich, J.Google Scholar
Krimsky, S. (1982b). “Social Responsibility in an Age of Synthetic Biology.” Environment 24:2–11.Google Scholar
League of Nations (1929). Treaty Series, Vol. XCIV, Number 2138, p. 65. Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare. TIAS 8061.Google Scholar
Malone, Thomas (1982). Letter from Thomas Malone, foreign secretary of the National Academy of Sciences, to Homer Neal, National Science Board Task Force on Science in the International Setting, May 18. National Science Board Document NSB 82-204, June 4, 1982.Google Scholar
Meyer, E. C., Lennon, Lynwood B., and Leonard, James E. (1977). “Defense Planning for Chemical Warfare.” In Meselson, Matthew (ed.), Chemical Weapons and Chemical Arms Control. New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Milewski, E. (1982). “RAC Discussion on the Construction of Biological Weapons.” Recombinant DNA Research Bulletin 5:188–191.Google Scholar
Morgan, J., and Whelan, W. J., eds. (1979). Recombinant DNA and Genetic Experimentation. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Mulkay, M. J. (1977). “Sociology of the Scientific Research Community.” In Spiegel-Rosing, Iva and de Solla Price, Derek (eds.), Science, Technology, and Society: A Cross-discipline Perspective. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences (1977). Research with Recombinant DNA. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences (1982a). Priorities in Biotechnology Research for International Development. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences (1982b). Scientific Communication and National Security. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Office of Science and Technology Policy Interagency Working Groups on Biotechnology (1983). Report on Competitive and Transfer Aspects of Biotechnology. Washington, D.C.: Office of Science and Technology Policy.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment (1981). Impacts of Applied Genetics. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment (forthcoming/a). Biotechnology: Commercialization and International Competitiveness. Washington, D.C.: Office of Technology Assessment.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment (forthcoming/b). The U.S. Competitive Position in Biotechnology. Washington, D.C.: Office of Technology Assessment. Official Journal of the European Economic Communities (1981). 24:1–4.Google Scholar
Orrego, C. (1981). Evaluation of Microbial Technologies Involved in Fuel Production, Agriculture, and Forestry. World Bank S&T Report No. 36. Washington, D.C.: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development.Google Scholar
Overseas Development Council (1975). Beyond Dependency: The Developing World Speaks Out. New York: Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
Panem, Sandra (1982). “The Interferon Dilemma: Secrecy vs. Open Exchange.” The Brookings Review 1:18–22.Google Scholar
Perpich, J. G. (1982a). “Cooperative Research Relationships among Government, Universities, and the Biotechnology Industry.” 1982 Conference on Industrial Science and Technology Innovation: Proceedings. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Perpich, J. G. (1982b). “Industrial Involvement in the Development of the NIH Recombinant DNA Research Guidelines and Related Federal Policies.” Recombinant DNA Technical Bulletin 5:59–79.Google Scholar
Perpich, J. G.(forthcoming). “Genetic Engineering and Related Biotechnologies: Scientific Progress and Public Policy.” In Biotechnology: Impact on Societal Institutions, a series of issues of Technology in Society, edited by Perpich, J. G.Google Scholar
Polyani, Michael (1962). “The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory.” Minerva 1:54–73.Google Scholar
Portugal, Franklin, and Cohen, Jack S. (1977). A Century of DNA. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Primack, Joel, and von Hippel, Frank (1974). Advice and Dissent. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ravetz, Jerome (1971). Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Recombinant DNA Research Documents Relating to NIH Guidelines for Research Involving Recombinant DNA Molecules. Volume 1, February 1975-June 1976; Volume 2, June 1976-November 1977; Volume 3, November 1977-September 1978; Volume 4, August-December 1978; Volume 5, January 1979-January 1980; Volume 6, January-November 1980; Volume 7, November 1980-August 1982. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Salam, Abdus (1983). Speech to the Belgrade meeting. Belgrade, Yugoslavia, December 13, 1983.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Richard (1983). “Chemical Warfare, A History of Horror.” Chemistry in Britain. April:271–278.Google Scholar
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (1971). The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Vol. 1, The Rise of CB Weapons. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Strickland, Stephen P. (1972). Politics, Science, and Dread Disease. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turbin, N. V. (1975). [Genetic Engineering: Reality, Perspectives, and Dangers]. Vorprosy Filosofii 1:47–56.Google Scholar
United Nations (1972). Treaties in International Agreement Series. Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. TIAS 8062.Google Scholar
United Nations (1980). Report of the Review Conference of the Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction. BWC/Conf. 1/5.Google Scholar
United Nations (1981a). United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The Establishment of an International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB): Report of a Group of Experts. UNIDO/IS.254.Google Scholar
United Nations (1981b). United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Report: Exchange of Views with Experts. UNIDO/IS.259.Google Scholar
United Nations (1982a). United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The Establishment of an International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB). UNIDO/IS.254.Google Scholar
United Nations (1982b). United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Five-year Work Program of the ICGEB. UNIDO/ID/WG.382/2.Google Scholar
United Nations (1983). United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Report of the High-Level Meeting on the Establishment of the International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. UNIDO/ID/WG.382/7.Google Scholar
USSR (1950). Materials on the Trial of Former Servicemen of the Japanese Army Charged with Manufacturing and Employing Bacteriological Weapons. Moscow, USSR: Foreign Languages Publishing House.Google Scholar
Whelan, W. J., Black, and S., eds. (1982). From Genetic Engineering to Biotechnology: The Critical Transition. London: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Zilinskas, R. A. (1978). “Recombinant DNA Research and the International System.” Southern California Law Review 51:1453–1501.Google Scholar
Zilinskas, R. A.(in press/a). “Anthrax in Sverdlovsk: Epidemic or Biological Warfare?” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.Google Scholar
Zilinskas, R. A.(in press/b)“Recombinant DNA Research and Bacteriological (Biological) Warfare.” In Zilinskas, R. A. and Zimmerman, B. (eds.), The Recombinant DNA Controversy: Reflections on the Past, Projections to the Future. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar