Skip to main content Accessibility help

Communities ready for takeoff: Integrating social assets for biofuel site-selection modeling

  • Sanne A. M. Rijkhoff (a1), Season A. Hoard (a2), Michael J. Gaffney (a3) and Paul M. Smith (a4)


Although much of the social science literature supports the importance of community assets for success in many policy areas, these assets are often overlooked when selecting communities for new infrastructure facilities. Extensive collaboration is crucial for the success of environmental and economic projects, yet it often is not adequately addressed when making siting decisions for new projects. This article develops a social asset framework that includes social, creative, and human capital to inform site-selection decisions. This framework is applied to the Northwest Advanced Renewables Alliance project to assess community suitability for biofuel-related developments. This framework is the first to take all necessary community assets into account, providing insight into successful site selection beyond current models. The framework not only serves as a model for future biorefinery projects but also guides tasks that depend on informed location selection for success.


Corresponding author

Correspondence: Sanne A. M. Rijkhoff, Mark O. Hatfield School of Government, Department of Political Science, Portland State University, P.O. Box 751, Portland OR, 97207-0751. Email:


Hide All
1 Klein v. U.S. Department of Energy, 753 F.3d 576 (2014).
2 McGlashen, Andy, “As key partners depart, future dims for Michigan cellulosic biofuel plant,” Midwest Energey News , 2013, August 6.
3 Reid, Andy, “Neighborhoods fighting plans for biofuel plant west of Delray Beach,” Sun Sentinel Times , 2010, September 2.
4 Stewart, Lance and Lambert, Dayton M., “Spatial heterogeneity of factors determining ethanol production site-selection in the U.S., 2000–2007,” Biomass and Bioenergy , 2010, 35(3): 12731285.
5 Zhang, Fengli, Johnson, Dana M., and Sutherland, John W., “A GIS-based method for identifying the optimal location for a facility to convert forest biomass to biofuel,” Biomass and Bioenergy , 2011, 35(9): 39513961.
6 Tigges, Leann M. and Noble, Molly, “Getting to yes or bailing on no: The site-selection process of ethanol plants in Wisconsin,” Rural Sociology , 2012, 77(4): 547568.
7 Portney, Kent E. and Perry, Jeffrey M., “Participation and the pursuit of sustainability in U.S. cities,” Urban Affairs Review , 2010, 46(1): 119139.
8 Miller, Evonne and Buys, Laurie, “The impact of social capital on residential water-affecting behaviors in a drought-prone Australian community,” Society & Natural Resources , 2008, 21(3): 244257.
9 Parisi, Domenico, Taquino, Michael, Grice, Steven Michael, and Gill, Duana A., “Civic responsibility and the environment: Linking local conditions to community environmental activeness,” Society & Natural Resources , 2010, 17(2): 97112.
10 Emery, Mary and Flora, Cornelia, “Spiraling up: Mapping community transformation with the Community Capitals Framework,” Journal of Community Development Society , 2006, 37(1): 1935.
11 Emery and Flora, 2006.
12 Reid, 2010.
13 Emery and Flora, 2006, p. 22.
14 For detailed examples of built, financial, and natural capital in site-selection research, see Natalie Martinkus, Wenping Shi, Nicholas Lovrich Jr., John Pierce, Paul Smith, and Michael Wolcott, “Integrating bio-geophysical and social assets into biomass-to-biofuel supply chain site decisions,” Biomass and Bioenergy, 2014, 66: 410–418.
15 See also, Martinkus, Natalie, Rijkhoff, Sanne A. M., Hoard, Season A., Shi, Wenping, Smith, Paul, Gaffney, Michael, and Wolcott, Michael, “Biorefinery site selection using a stepwise biogeophysical and social analysis approach,” Biomass and Bioenergy , 2017, 97: 139148.
16 Putnam, Robert D., Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).
17 Putnam, Robert D., Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2000).
18 Coleman, James S., “Social capital in the creation of human capital,” American Journal of Sociology , 1988, 94: S95S120.
19 Montgomery, John D. and Inkeles, Alex, Social Capital as a Policy Resource (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer Science and Business B.V., 2001).
20 Putnam, Robert D., “Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital, an interview with the author,” Journal of Democracy , 1995, 6(1): 6578.
21 Rupasingha, Anil, Goetz, Stephan J., and Freshwater, David, “The production of social capital in US counties,” Journal of Socio-Economics , 2006, 35: 83101.
22 Erp, Michael, Gaffney, Michael, Goldman, John, Gray, Kelsey, and Lovrich, Nicholas, WRICOPS — A Decade of Service, 1997–2007: A Brief History, Major Accomplishments, Principal Activities and Prospects for the Future (Pullman: Division of Governmental Studies and Services, Washington State University, 2009).
23 Lovrich, Nicholas P., Gaffney, Michael J., Weber, Edward P., Bireley, R. Michael, Matthews, Dayna R., and Bjork, Bruce, “Inter-agency collaborative approaches to Endangered Species Act compliance and salmon recovery in the Pacific Northwest,” International Journal of Organizational Theory and Behavior , 2005, 8(2): 237273.
24 Grott, Catherine, Health Care Reform at the State Level: The Dynamics of Achieving Service Integration at the Local Health Department Level in Montana (Pullman: Washington State University, 1999).
25 Portney and Perry, 2010.
26 Miller and Buys, 2008.
27 Parisi et al., 2010.
28 Flora, Cornelia B., “Social capital and sustainability: Agriculture and communities in the great plains of the Corn Belt,” Research in Rural Sociology and Development: A Research Annual , 1995, 6: 227246.
29 Cramb, Rob A., “Social capital and soil conservation: Evidence from the Philippines,” Australian Journal of Agriculture and Resource Economics , 2005, 49(2): 211226.
30 Briceno, Tania and Stagl, Sigrid, “the role of social processes for sustainable consumption,” Journal of Cleaner Production , 2006, 14(17): 15411551.
31 Jones, Nikoleta, Sophoulis, Costas M., Iosifides, Theodoros, Botetzagias, Iosif, and Evangelinos, Konstantinos, “The influence of social capital on environmental policy instruments,” Environmental Politics , 2009, 18(4): 595611.
32 Jones et al., 2009.
33 Putnam, 1993.
34 Coleman, 1988.
35 Montgomery and Inkeles, 2001.
36 Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater, 2006.
37 Bourdieu, Pierre, “The forms of capital,” Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Richardson, John G., ed. (New York: Greenwood Press, 1986), pp. 241258.
38 Coleman, 1988.
39 Montgomery and Inkeles, 2001.
40 Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater, 2006.
41 Putnam, 1993.
42 Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater, 2006.
43 Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater, 2006.
44 Coleman, 1988.
45 Putnam, 1995.
46 Montgomery and Inkeles, 2001.
47 Budd, William and Lovrich, Nicholas Jr., “Cultural sources of variations in US urban sustainability attributes,” Cities , 2008, 25(5): 257267.
48 Emery and Flora, 2006.
49 Florida, Richard, The Rise of the Creative Class (New York: Basic Books, 2002), p. 273.
50 Florida, 2002.
51 Florida, 2002.
52 Budd and Lovrich, 2008.
53 Martinkus et al., 2014.
54 Martinkus et al., 2017.
55 Emery and Flora, 2006.
56 Pretty, Jules and Ward, Hugh, “Social capital and the environment,” World Development , 2001, 29(2): 209227.
57 Pretty and Ward, 2001, p. 209.
58 Martinkus et al., 2014.
59 Martinkus et al., 2017.
60 Martinkus et al., 2014.
61 Although the datasets are publicly available, we can provide the county scores for all counties within the United States upon request.
62 The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. 2013. “County Health Rankings National Data.” (accessed April 5, 2014).
63 Western States Arts Federation. 2010. “The Creative Vitality™ Index: An Overview.” (accessed April 5, 2014).
64 Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater, 2006.
65 Unfortunately, updated scores for CVI and social capital were not available at the time this manuscript was completed. In order to keep comparisons possible, we decided not to divert too much with the health data.
66 For a more detailed discussion of the remaining types of capital (natural and built), see Martinkus et al., 2014.
67 Rupasingha, Goetz, and Freshwater, 2006.
68 A table with all calculated benchmarks for all census regions can be found in the online appendix.
69 Grott, 1999.
70 Lovrich et al., 2005.
71 The tables with all the raw scores of the counties can be found in the online appendix.
72 Lovrich et al., 2005.
73 Grott, 1999.
74 Martinkus et al., 2014.
75 Martinkus et al., 2017.
76 Martinkus et al., 2014.
77 Martinkus et al., 2017.


Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Rijkhoff et al. supplementary material

 Word (62 KB)
62 KB

Communities ready for takeoff: Integrating social assets for biofuel site-selection modeling

  • Sanne A. M. Rijkhoff (a1), Season A. Hoard (a2), Michael J. Gaffney (a3) and Paul M. Smith (a4)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.