Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5d6d958fb5-x2fsp Total loading time: 0.359 Render date: 2022-11-28T12:08:02.949Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Resource ecologies, political economies and the ethics of audio technologies in the Anthropocene

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2020

Eliot Bates*
Affiliation:
Department of Music, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365 Fifth Ave, New York, NY10016 E-mail: ebates@gc.cuny.edu

Abstract

Understanding how recorded and amplified stage musics contribute towards producing the Anthropocene necessitates attending to complex transnational flows of material, capital and labor, and how they coalesce into technological objects. This is complicated by the wide array of sites, practices and knowledges involved during various stages of the production process, from initial resource extraction, to smelting, component manufacturing, technology assembly, and distribution. To develop a suitable technological ethics, and to understand what happens to environments and to human, animal and plant lifeworlds, requires one to resist abstraction and undertake a global accounting of resource ecologies with recourse to planetary-scale political economy. Towards this goal, I provide a partial account of an early 2000s mic preamp, a mundane but nonetheless fetishised recording studio technological object. I focus on two metals, tin and tantalum, that are primarily extracted for electronics manufacturing, and two building blocks of electronics, solder and capacitors, which are essential for making contemporary electronics.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asmarhansyah, A., Badayos, R., Sanchez, P., Sta Cruz, P., and Florece, L. 2017. ‘Land suitability evaluation of abandoned tin-mining areas for agricultural development in Bangka Island, Indonesia’, Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management, 4/4, pp. 907–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auty, R.M. 1993. Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies: The Resource Curse Thesis, (Abingdon, Taylor & Francis)Google Scholar
Auty, R.M. 2007. ‘Natural resources, capital accumulation and the resource curse’, Ecological Economics, 61, pp. 627–3410.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, C., and Banks, G. 2003. ‘Resource wars: the anthropology of mining’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 32/1, pp. 287313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleischwitz, R., Dittrich, M., and Pierdicca, C. 2012. ‘Coltan from Central Africa, international trade and implications for any certification’, Resources Policy, 37/1, pp. 192910.1016/j.resourpol.2011.12.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortolotti, L. 2012. ‘Delusions and three myths of irrational belief’, in Bortolotti, L. (ed.), Delusions in Context (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 97116Google Scholar
Both, J. 2016. ‘Electrolytic capacitors from the postwar period to the present’, IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine, 32/2, pp. 826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridge, G. 2004. ‘Contested terrain: mining and the environment’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 29/1, pp. 205–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheru, F. 1992. ‘Structural adjustment, primary resource trade and sustainable development in Sub-Saharan Africa’, World Development, 20/4, pp. 497512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, P. 2017. ‘The institutional and psychological foundations of natural resource policies’, The Journal of Development Studies, 53/2, pp. 217–2810.1080/00220388.2016.1160067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, N. 2009. Handmade Electronic Music: The Art of Hardware Hacking (New York, Routledge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crutzen, P. 2002. ‘Geology of mankind’, Nature, 415/3, pp. 23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cubitt, S. 2017. Finite Media: Environmental Implications of Digital Technologies (Durham, NC, Duke University Press)Google Scholar
Cuvelier, J., Bockstael, S., Vlassenroot, K., and Iguma, C. 2014. Analyzing the Impact of the Dodd–Frank Act on Congolese Livelihoods (SSRC Conflict Prevention and Peace Forum)Google Scholar
Devine, K. 2015. ‘Decomposed: a political ecology of music’, Popular Music, 34/3, pp. 367–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicken, P., Kelly, P., Olds, K., and Wai-Chung Yeung, H. 2001. ‘Chains and networks, territories and scales: towards a relational framework for analysing the global economy’, Global Networks, 1/2, pp. 89112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diemel, J.A. 2018. ‘Authority and access to the cassiterite and coltan trade in Bukama Territory (DRC)’, The Extractive Industries and Society, 5/1, pp. 5665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EPA. 2001. ‘Hudson River PCBs Site New York’, Record of Decision (New York, United States Environmental Protection Agency)Google Scholar
EPA. 2011. ‘Five-Year Review Report: Cornell–Dubilier Electronics Superfund Site’, Report 113367 (New York, United States Environmental Protection Agency)Google Scholar
EPA. 2018. ‘Community Involvement Plan: Mallory Capacitor Co. Superfund Site’, Report 11116057 (Atlanta, United States Environmental Protection Agency)Google Scholar
Erman, E. 2007. ‘Deregulation of the tin trade and creation of a local shadow state: a Bangka case study’, in Nordholt, H.S., van Klinken, G. (eds.), Renegotiating Boundaries: Local Politics in Post-Suharto Indonesia (Leiden: Brill), pp. 177202Google Scholar
Erman, E. 2008. ‘Rethinking legal and illegal economy: a case study of tin mining in Bangka Island’, Southeast Asia: History and Culture, 37, pp. 91111Google Scholar
Flood, L. 2016. ‘Building and becoming: DIY music technology in New York and Berlin’, PhD Dissertation, Columbia UniversityGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Y. 2017. Tantalum and Niobium-Based Capacitors: Science, Technology, and Applications (Cham, Springer)Google Scholar
Gevao, B., Alegria, H., Jaward, F., and Beg, M. 2010. ‘Persistent organic pollutants in the developing world’, in Harrad, S. (ed.), Persistent Organic Pollutants (Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell), pp. 137–70Google Scholar
Gibson, J.J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Boston, MA, Houghton Mifflin)Google Scholar
Gilberthorpe, E., and Rajak, D. 2017. ‘The anthropology of extraction: critical perspectives on the resource curse’, The Journal of Development Studies, 53/2, pp. 186204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godoy, R. 1985. ‘Mining: anthropological perspectives’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 14/1, pp. 199217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golumbia, D. 2016. The Politics of Bitcoin: Software as Right-wing Extremism (Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press)Google Scholar
Goodwin, A. 2004. ‘Rationalization and democratization in the new technologies of popular music’, in Frith, S. (ed.), Popular Music: Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies (London, Routledge), pp. 147–68Google Scholar
Gouldner, A.W. 1954a. Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy (Glengoe, The Free Press)Google Scholar
Gouldner, A.W. 1954b. Wildcat Strike: A Study in Worker–Management Relationships (New York, Harper & Row)Google Scholar
Graeber, D. 2011. ‘Consumption’, Current Anthropology, 52/4, pp. 489511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansson, S.O. 2017. The Ethics of Technology: Methods and Approaches (London, Rowman & Littlefield)Google Scholar
Harkins, P. 2019. Digital Sampling: The Design and Use of Music Technologies (London, Routledge)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. 1989. The Condition of Postmodernity: an Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change (Cambridge, Blackwell)Google Scholar
Hayes, K., and Burge, R. 2003. Coltan Mining in the Democratic Republic of Congo: How Tantalum-using Industries Can Commit to the Reconstruction of the DRC (Cambridge, Flora & Fauna International)Google Scholar
Hermon, D., Ganefri, , Putra, A., and Oktorie, O. 2018. ‘The model of mangrove land cover change for the estimation of blue carbon stock change in Belitung Island – Indonesia’, International Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences, 13/2, pp. 191202Google Scholar
Hodal, K. 2012. ‘Death metal: tin mining in Indonesia’, The Guardian, 13 NovemberGoogle Scholar
Hornborg, A. 1998. ‘Ecosystems and world systems: accumulation as an ecological process’, Journal of World-systems Research, 4, pp. 169–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornborg, A. 2012. ‘Accumulation: land as a medium of domination’, in Hornborg, A., Clark, B. and Hermele, K. (eds.), Ecology and Power: Struggles Over Land and Material Resources in the Past, Present, and Future (London, Routledge), pp. 1322Google Scholar
Hornborg, A. 2014. ‘Technology as fetish: Marx, Latour, and the cultural foundations of capitalism’, Theory, Culture & Society, 31/4, pp. 119–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornborg, A. 2016. Global Magic: Technologies of Appropriation from Ancient Rome to Wall Street (New York, Palgrave Macmillan)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornborg, A. 2017. ‘Dithering while the planet burns: anthropologists’ approaches to the Anthropocene’, Reviews in Anthropology, 46/2–3, pp. 6177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornborg, A. 2018. ‘Relationism as revelation or prescription? Some thoughts on how Ingold's implicit critique of modernity could be harnessed to political ecology’, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 43/3–4, pp. 111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornborg, A. 2019. Nature, Society, and Justice in the Anthropocene: Unravelling the Money–Energy–Technology Complex (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, N.R. 2008. ‘An acoustic register, tenacious images, and Congolese scenes of rape and repetition’, Cultural Anthropology, 23/2, pp. 220–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iraki, X.N. 2014. ‘Thieves fry Kenya's power grid to cook fast food’, Thomson Reuters Foundation News, 27 DecemberGoogle Scholar
Jacka, J.K. 2018. ‘The anthropology of mining: the social and environmental impacts of resource extraction in the mineral age’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 47/1, 6177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, S. 2002. ‘Making a killing: criminality & coping in the Kivu War economy’, Review of African Political Economy, 29/93–94, 517–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, S. 2014. Mining Capitalism: The Relationship between Corporations and Their Critics (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri-Dutt, K. 2018. Between the Plough and the Pick Informal, Artisanal and Small-scale Mining in the Contemporary World (Acton, Australian National University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network Theory (New York, Oxford University Press)Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime (Cambridge, Polity Press)Google Scholar
Leifchild, J.R. 1862. Cornwall: its Mines and Miners: with Sketches of Scenery, Designed as a Popular Introduction to Metallic Mines (London, Longman)Google Scholar
Lockwood, D. 2019. ‘Phil Dudderidge of Focusrite: the man behind the brand’, Sound on Sound, August.Google Scholar
Lojek, B. 2007. History of Semiconductor Engineering (Berlin, Springer)Google Scholar
Malhi, Y. 2017. ‘The concept of the Anthropocene’, Annual Review of Environment & Resources, 42, pp. 77104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malm, A. 2012. ‘Steam: nineteenth-century mechanization and the power of capital’, in Hornborg, A., Clark, B. and Hermele, K. (eds.), Ecology and Power: Struggles Over Land and Material Resources in the Past, Present, and Future (London, Routledge), pp. 108–23Google Scholar
Malm, A. 2016. Fossil Capital: The Rise of Steam Power and the Roots of Global Warming (London, Verso)Google Scholar
Mancheri, N.A., Sprecher, B., Deetman, S., Young, S., Bleischwitz, R., Dong, L., Kleijn, R., and Tukker, A. 2018. ‘Resilience in the tantalum supply chain’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129, pp. 5669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, J. 2016. Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism, (Oakland, CA, PM Press)Google Scholar
Moran, D., McBain, D., Kanemoto, K., Lenzen, M., and Geschke, A. 2015. ‘Global supply chains of coltan’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19/3, pp. 357–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, T. 2013. Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology After the End of the World (Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press)Google Scholar
Mustapha, A.O., Mbuzukongira, P., and Mangala, M. 2007. ‘Occupational radiation exposures of artisans mining columbite–tantalite in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo’, Journal of Radiological Protection, 27/2, pp. 187–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nash, J. 1979. We Eat the Mines and the Mines Eat Us: Dependency and Exploitation in Bolivian Tin Mines (New York, Columbia University Press)Google Scholar
OECD. 2010. Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-affected and High-risk Areas (Paris, OECD)Google Scholar
Oudshoorn, N., and Pinch, T.J. 2003. How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technologies (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papyrakis, E. 2017. ‘The resource curse – what have we learned from two decades of intensive research’, The Journal of Development Studies, 53/2, pp. 175–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papyrakis, E., Rieger, M., and Gilberthorpe, E. 2017. ‘Corruption and the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative’, The Journal of Development Studies, 53/2 (2017), pp. 295309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patteson, T. 2016. Instruments for New Music: Sound, Technology, and Modernism (Oakland, CA, University of California Press)Google Scholar
Pinch, T.J. 1992. ‘Opening black boxes: science, technology and society’, Social Studies of Science, 22/3, pp. 487510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinch, T.J., and Bijker, W.E. 1987The social construction of facts and artifacts: or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other’, in Bijker, W., Hughes, T. and Pinch, T. (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press), pp. 1750Google Scholar
Pinch, T., and Trocco, F. 2002. Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesizer, (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Rodgers, T. 2015. ‘Tinkering with cultural memory: gender and the politics of synthesizer historiography’, Feminist Media Histories, 1/4, pp. 530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, C. 2014. ‘The tin frontier: mining, empire, and environment in Southeast Asia, 1870s–1930s’, Environmental History, 19/3, pp. 454–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosyida, I., Khan, W., and Sasaoka, M. 2018. ‘Marginalization of a coastal resource-dependent community: a study on Tin Mining in Indonesia’, The Extractive Industries and Society, 5/1, pp. 165–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheller, M. 2014. Aluminum Dreams: The Making of Light Modernity (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simondon, G. 2017. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects (Minneapolis, MN, Univocal Publishing)Google Scholar
Smith, J. 2015. Eco-Sonic Media (Oakland, CA, University of California Press)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J.H. 2011. ‘Tantalus in the Digital Age: coltan ore, temporal dispossession, and “movement” in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo’, American Ethnologist, 38/1, pp. 1735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.H., and Mantz, J.W. 2006. ‘Do cellular phones dream of civil war? The mystification of production and the consequences of technology fetishism in the Congo’, in Kirsch, M. (ed.), Inclusion and Exclusion in the Global Arena (New York, Routledge), pp. 7193Google Scholar
Stearns, J. 2012. Dancing in the Glory of Monsters: The Collapse of the Congo and the Great War of Africa (New York, PublicAffairs)Google Scholar
Stengers, I. 2015. In Catastrophic Times: Resisting the Coming Barbarism (London, Open Humanities Press)Google Scholar
Sterne, J. 2012. MP3: The Meaning of a Format (Durham, NC, Duke University Press)Google Scholar
Stiegler, B. 2018. The Neganthropocene, (London, Open Humanities Press)Google Scholar
Stoop, N., Verpoorten, M., and van der Windt, P. 2018. ‘More legislation, more violence? The impact of Dodd–Frank in the DRC’, PLoS ONE, 13/8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, R. 1998. SMT Soldering Handbook, 2nd edn (Oxford, Newness)Google Scholar
Taussig, M. 1980. The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America (Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press)Google Scholar
The Straits Times. 2018. ‘US, World Bank, IMF balk over billions in secret China loans to poor nations’, The Straits Times, 22 MayGoogle Scholar
Théberge, P. 1997. Any Sound You Can Imagine: Making Music/Consuming Technology (Hanover, CT, Wesleyan University Press)Google Scholar
Verbeek, P.P. 2011. Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things (Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, C., Musamba, J., and Radley, B. 2018. ‘A miner's canary in eastern Congo: formalisation of artisanal 3T mining and precarious livelihoods in South Kivu’, The Extractive Industries and Society, 5/1, pp. 7380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakenge, C.I. 2018. ‘“Referees become players”: Accessing coltan mines in the Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo’, The Extractive Industries and Society, 5/1, pp. 6672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasielewski, A. 2017. Made in Brooklyn: Artists, Hipsters, Makers, Gentrifiers (Winchester, Zero Books)Google Scholar
Welker, M. 2014. Enacting the Corporation: An American Mining Firm in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia (Berkeley, CA, University of California Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitney, T. 2015. ‘Conflict minerals, black markets, and transparency: the legislative background of Dodd–Frank Section 1502 and its historical lessons’, Journal of Human Rights, 14/2, pp. 183200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winner, L. 2017. ‘Rebranding the Anthropocene: a rectification of names’, Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 21/2–3, pp. 282–94Google Scholar
Wurtzler, S.J. 2007. Electric Sounds: Technological Change and the Rise of Corporate Mass Media (New York, Columbia University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Resource ecologies, political economies and the ethics of audio technologies in the Anthropocene
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Resource ecologies, political economies and the ethics of audio technologies in the Anthropocene
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Resource ecologies, political economies and the ethics of audio technologies in the Anthropocene
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *