Skip to main content
×
Home

Evaluation of Active Mortality Surveillance System Data for Monitoring Hurricane-Related Deaths—Texas, 2008

  • Ekta Choudhary (a1), David F. Zane (a2), Crystal Beasley (a3), Russell Jones (a4), Araceli Rey (a5), Rebecca S. Noe (a1), Colleen Martin (a1), Amy F. Wolkin (a1) and Tesfaye M. Bayleyegn (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract Introduction

The Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) implemented an active mortality surveillance system to enumerate and characterize hurricane-related deaths during Hurricane Ike in 2008. This surveillance system used established guidelines and case definitions to categorize deaths as directly, indirectly, and possibly related to Hurricane Ike.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate Texas DSHS' active mortality surveillance system using US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) surveillance system evaluation guidelines.

Methods

Using CDC's Updated Guidelines for Surveillance System Evaluation, the active mortality surveillance system of the Texas DSHS was evaluated. Data from the active mortality surveillance system were compared with Texas vital statistics data for the same time period to estimate the completeness of reported disaster-related deaths.

Results

From September 8 through October 13, 2008, medical examiners (MEs) and Justices of the Peace (JPs) in 44 affected counties reported deaths daily by using a one-page, standardized mortality form. The active mortality surveillance system identified 74 hurricane-related deaths, whereas a review of vital statistics data revealed only four deaths that were hurricane-related. The average time of reporting a death by active mortality surveillance and vital statistics was 14 days and 16 days, respectively.

Conclusions

Texas's active mortality surveillance system successfully identified hurricane-related deaths. Evaluation of the active mortality surveillance system suggested that it is necessary to collect detailed and representative mortality data during a hurricane because vital statistics do not capture sufficient information to identify whether deaths are hurricane-related. The results from this evaluation will help improve active mortality surveillance during hurricanes which, in turn, will enhance preparedness and response plans and identify public health interventions to reduce future hurricane-related mortality rates.

Choudhary E, Zane DF, Beasley C, Jones R, Rey A, Noe RS, Martin C, Wolkin AF, Bayleyegn TM. Evaluation of active mortality surveillance system data for monitoring hurricane-related deaths, Texas, 2008. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(4):1-6.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Ekta Choudhary, PhD, MPH Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 4770 Buford Highway, NE MS F-57 Chamblee, GA 30341 USA E-mail echoudhary@cdc.gov
References
Hide All
1. Thacker MT, Lee R, Sabogal RI, et al. . Overview of deaths associated with natural events, United States. 1979-2004. Disasters. 2008;32(2):303-315.
2. Diaz JH. The public health impact of hurricanes and major flooding. J La State Med Soc. 2004;156(3):145-150.
3. Shultz JM, Russell J, Espinel Z. Epidemiology of tropical cyclones: the dynamics of disaster, disease, and development. Epidemiol Rev. 2005;27:21-35.
4. Ragan P, Schulte J, Nelson SJ, et al. . Mortality surveillance: 2004 to 2005 Florida hurricane-related deaths. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2008;29(2):148-153.
5. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/index.php?report=global&year=2008&month=sep. Accessed September 8, 2009.
6. US Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency. Hurricane Ike: From Disaster to Recovery. http://www.fema.gov/hazard/hurricane/2008/ike/about.shtm. Accessed October 3, 2009.
7. Combs DL, Quenemoen LE, Parrish RG, et al. . Assessing disaster-attributed mortality: development and application of a definition and classification matrix. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28(6):1124-1129.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems: recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001;50:RR-13:1-35.
9. Robles SC, Marrett LD, Clarke EA, et al. . An application of capture-recapture methods to the estimation of completeness of cancer registration. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(5):495-501.
10. Chandrasekaran C, Deming WC. On a method of estimating birth and death rates and extent of registration. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1949;44(245):101-115.
11. Cates W, Smith JC, Rochat RW, et al. . Assessment of surveillance and vital statics data for monitoring abortion mortality, United States, 1972-1975. Am J Epidemiol. 1978;108(3):200-206.
12. Bayleyegn T, Wolkin A, Oberst K, et al. . Rapid assessment of the needs and health status in Santa Rosa and Escambia Counties, Florida, after Hurricane Ivan, September 2004. Disaster Manag Response. 2006;4(1):12-18.
13. Brunkard J, Namulanda G, Ratard R. Hurricane Katrina deaths, Louisiana, 2005. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008;2(4):215-223.
14. Lew EO, Wetli CV. Mortality from Hurricane Andrew. J Forensic Sci. 1996;41(3):449-452.
15. Lugosi CI. Natural disaster, unnatural deaths: the killings on the life care floors at Tenet's Memorial Medical Center after Hurricane Katrina, Issues. Law Med. 2007;23(1):71-85.
16. Zane DF, Bayleyegn TM, Hellsten J, et al. . Tracking deaths related to Hurricane Ike, Texas, 2008. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011;5(1):23-28.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 12 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 141 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.