Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Factors Associated with the Willingness of Health Care Personnel to Work During an Influenza Public Health Emergency: An Integrative Review

  • Mahesh Devnani (a1)
Abstract
Introduction

The first decade of the 21st century has witnessed three major influenza public health emergencies: (1) the severe acute respiratory syndrome of 2002-2003; (2) the avian flu of 2006; and (3) the 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza. An effective public health response to an influenza public health emergency depends on the majority of uninfected health care personnel (HCP) continuing to report to work. The purposes of this study were to determine the state of the evidence concerning the willingness of HCP to work during an influenza public health emergency, to identify the gaps for future investigation, and to facilitate evidence-based influenza public health emergency planning.

Methods

A systemic literature review of relevant, peer-reviewed, quantitative, English language studies published from January 1, 2001 through June 30, 2010 was conducted. Search strategies included the Cochrane Library, PubMed, PubMed Central, EBSCO Psychological and Behavioral Sciences Collection, Google Scholar, ancestry searching of citations in relevant publications, and information from individuals with a known interest in the topic.

Results

Thirty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Factors associated with a willingness to work during an influenza public health emergency include: being male, being a doctor or nurse, working in a clinical or emergency department, working full-time, prior influenza education and training, prior experience working during an influenza emergency, the perception of value in response, the belief in duty, the availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), and confidence in one's employer. Factors found to be associated with less willingness were: being female, being in a supportive staff position, working part-time, the peak phase of the influenza emergency, concern for family and loved ones, and personal obligations. Interventions that resulted in the greatest increase in the HCP's willingness to work were preferential access to Tamiflu for the HCP and his/her family, and the provision of a vaccine for the individual and his/her family.

Conclusions

Understanding the factors that contribute to the willingness of HCP to report to work during an influenza public health emergency is critical to emergency planning and preparedness. Information from this review can guide emergency policy makers, planners, and implementers in both understanding and influencing the willingness of HCP to work during an influenza public health emergency.

DevnaniM. Factors Associated with the Willingness of Health Care Personnel to Work During an Influenza Public Health Emergency: An Integrative Review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012;27(6):1-16.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence: Mahesh Devnani, MHA Department of Health Policy and Management Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, MD 21205 USA E-mail devnaniji@gmail.com
References
Hide All
1.Cox, NJ, Tamblyn, SE, Tam, T. Influenza pandemic planning. Vaccine. 2003;21(16):1801-1803.
2. Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation TeamDawood, FS, Jain, S, Finelli, L, et al. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(25):2605-2615.
3.Seale, H, Leask, J, Po, K, et al. “Will they just pack up and leave?” Attitudes and intended behaviour of hospital health care workers during an influenza pandemic. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:30.
4.Damery, S, Wilson, S, Draper, H, et al. Will the NHS continue to function in an influenza pandemic? A survey of health care workers in the West Midlands, UK. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:142.
5.Damery, S, Draper, H, Wilson, S, et al. Health care workers’ perceptions of the duty to work during an influenza pandemic. J Med Ethics. 2010;36(1):12-18.
6.Garrett, AL, Park, YS, Redlener, I. Mitigating absenteeism in hospital workers during a pandemic. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(Suppl 2):S141-S147.
7.Whittemore, R, Knafl, K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546-553.
8.Chaffee, M. Willingness of health care personnel to work in a disaster: an integrative review of the literature. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(1):42-56.
9.Dixon-Woods, M, Agarwal, S, Jones, D, et al. Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):45-53.
10.Gifford, W, Davies, B, Edwards, N, et al. Managerial leadership for nurses’ use of research evidence: an integrative review of the literature. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4(3):126-145.
11.Kirkevold, M. Integrative nursing research—an important strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice. J Adv Nurs. 1997;25(5):977-984.
12.Locke, L, Silverman, J, Spirduso, W. (eds). Reading and Understanding Research, 2nd ed.California: Sage Publications; 2004.
13.Tzeng, HM. Nurses’ professional care obligation and their attitudes towards SARS infection control measures in Taiwan during and after the 2003 epidemic. Nurs Ethics. 2004;11(3):277-289.
14.Gullion, J. School nurses as volunteers in a bioterrorism event. Biosecur Bioterror. 2004;2(2):112-117.
15.Koh, D, Lim, MK, Chia, SE, et al. Risk perception and impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) on work and personal lives of health care workers in Singapore: what can we learn? Med Care. 2005;43(7):676-682.
16.Qureshi, K, Gershon, R, Sherman, M, et al. Health care workers’ ability and willingness to report to duty during catastrophic disasters. J Urban Health. 2005;82(3):378-388.
17.Balicer, RD, Omer, SB, Barnett, DJ, et al. Local public health workers’ perceptions toward responding to an influenza pandemic. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:99.
18.Ehrenstein, BP, Hanses, F, Salzberger, B. Influenza pandemic and professional duty: family or patients first? A survey of hospital employees. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:311.
19.Tzeng, HM, Yin, CY. Nurses’ fears and professional obligations concerning possible human-to-human avian flu. Nurs Ethics. 2006;13(5):455-470.
20.Hogg, W, Huston, P, Martin, C, et al. Enhancing public health response to respiratory epidemics—are family physicians willing to help? Can Fam Physician. 2006;52(10):1254-1260.
21.Shiao, JS, Koh, D, Lo, LH, et al. Factors predicting nurses’ consideration of leaving their job during the SARS outbreak. Nurs Ethics. 2007;14(1):5-17.
22.Cheong, SK, Wong, TY, Lee, HY, et al. Concerns and preparedness for an avian influenza pandemic: a comparison between community hospital and tertiary hospital health care workers. Ind Health. 2007;45(5):653-661.
23.Tam, DK, Lee, S, Lee, SS. Impact of SARS on avian influenza preparedness in health care workers. Infection. 2007;35(5):320-325.
24.Butsashvili, M, Triner, W, Kamkamidze, G, et al. Knowledge and anticipated behavior of health care workers in response to an outbreak of pandemic influenza in Georgia. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2007;1(3):329-332.
25.Gershon, RRM, Qureshi, KA, Stone, PW, et al. Home health care challenges and avian influenza. Home Health Care Manag Pract. 2007;20(1):58-69.
26.Wong, TY, Koh, GC, Cheong, SK, et al. A cross-sectional study of primary-care physicians in Singapore on their concerns and preparedness for an avian influenza outbreak. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008;37(6):458-464.
27.Wong, TY, Koh, GC, Cheong, SK, et al. Concerns, perceived impact and preparedness in an avian influenza pandemic—a comparative study between health care workers in primary and tertiary care. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2008;37(2):96-102.
28.Irvin, CB, Cindrich, L, Patterson, W, et al. Survey of hospital health care personnel response during a potential avian influenza pandemic: will they come to work? Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008;23(4):328-335.
29.Martinese, F, Keijzers, G, Grant, S, et al. How would Australian hospital staff react to an avian influenza admission, or an influenza pandemic? Emerg Med Australas. 2009;21(1):12-24.
30.Kaiser, HE, Barnett, DJ, Hsu, EB, et al. Perspectives of future physicians on disaster medicine and public health preparedness: challenges of building a capable and sustainable auxiliary medical workforce. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2009;3(4):210-216.
31.Shabanowitz, RB, Reardon, JE. Avian flu pandemic—flight of the health care worker? HEC Forum. 2009;21(4):365-385.
32.Basta, NE, Edwards, SE, Schulte, J. Assessing public health department employees’ willingness to report to work during an influenza pandemic. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009;15(5):375-383.
33.Barnett, DJ, Balicer, RD, Thompson, CB, et al. Assessment of local public health workers’ willingness to respond to pandemic influenza through application of the extended parallel process model. PLoS One. 2009;4(7):e6365.
34.Mortelmans, LJ, De Cauwer, HG, Van Dyck, E, et al. Are Belgian senior medical students ready to deliver basic medical care in case of a H5N1 pandemic? Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(5):438-442.
35.Daugherty, EL, Perl, TM, Rubinson, L, et al. Survey study of the knowledge, attitudes, and expected behaviors of critical care clinicians regarding an influenza pandemic. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009;30(12):1143-1149.
36.Wong, ELY, Wong, SYS, Kung, K, et al. Will the community nurse continue to function during H1N1 influenza pandemic: a cross-sectional study of Hong Kong community nurses? BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:107.
37.Seale, H, Wang, Q, Yang, P, et al. Hospital health care workers’ understanding of and attitudes toward pandemic influenza in Beijing. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2012;24(1):39-47.
38.Gershon, RRM, Vandelinde, N, Magda, LA, et al. Evaluation of a pandemic preparedness training intervention for emergency medical services personnel. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24(6):508-511.
39.Tippett, VC, Watt, K, Raven, SG, et al. Anticipated behaviors of emergency prehospital medical care providers during an influenza pandemic. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;25(1):20-25.
40.Barnett, DJ, Levine, R, Thompson, CB, et al. Gauging U.S. Emergency Medical Services workers’ willingness to respond to pandemic influenza using a threat- and efficacy-based assessment framework. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9856.
41.Polit, D, Beck, C. (eds). Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice, 8th ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
42.Waltz, C, Strickland, O, Lenz, E. (eds). Measurement in Nursing and Health Research, 3rd ed.New York: Springer; 2005.
43.Wilson, E. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Vintage Books; 1998.
44.Patel, MS, Phillips, CB, Pearce, C, et al. General practice and pandemic influenza: a framework for planning and comparison of plans in five countries. PLoS One. 2008;3(5):e2269.
45.Alexander, GC, Wynia, MK. Ready and willing? Physicians’ sense of preparedness for bioterrorism. Health Aff. 2003;22(5):189-197.
46.Draper, H, Wilson, S, Ives, J, et al. Healthcare workers’ attitudes towards working during pandemic influenza: a multi method study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:192.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
  • ISSN: 1049-023X
  • EISSN: 1945-1938
  • URL: /core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed