Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-23T02:06:07.673Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Benefits of yeast culture supplementation on the performance of bull calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

J. A. Pickard*
Affiliation:
Alltech Biotechnology Centre, Sarney, Summerhill Rd, Dunboyne, Co. Meath. Ireland.
D. Wilde
Affiliation:
Alltech UK Ltd, Alltech House, Ryhall Road, Stamford, Lincs, PE9 1TZ
G. Bertin
Affiliation:
Alltech France, 2-4 avenue du 6 juin 1944, 95190 Goussainville, France
Get access

Extract

The use of direct fed microbials has been shown to enhance digestion in the ruminant. One source of microbial live populations is a yeast culture Saccharomyces cerevisae (Yea-Sacc1026, CBS 493.94; Alltech Inc, USA), and its use in ruminants has been associated with a range of benefits including an overall increase in dry matter and fiber digestibility (Wiedmeier and Arambel, 1985), combating heat stress in lactating cows (Huber and Higgenbotham, 1985) and increased performance (Fallon and Harte, 1987). Glade and Biesik (1982) working with yearling horses, demonstrated increased DM and N digestibility when S. cerevisae was added to the diet. It was suggested that S. cerevisae enhanced cellulolytic activity, triggering microbial metabolism changes in the horse’s large intestine that enhance hemicellulose fermentation. They also reported that the addition of S. cerevisae results in smaller percentages of absorbed nitrogen excreted in the urine, indicating that the biological value of the S. cerevisae -supplemented diets may be more than the direct contribution of the nitrogen within the yeast itself. The aim of this review is to determine the effects of S. cerevisae on performance parameters of bulls.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dawson, K. 1987. Mode of action of yeast cultures in rumen – natural fermentation modifiers. Proceedings, Alltech’s Third Annual Symposium. Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. Lexington, KY, April.Google Scholar
Fallon, R. J., and Harte, F. J. 1987. The effect of yeast culture inclusion in calf concentrate diets on calf performance. Journal of Dairy Science 70 Suppl. 1: 143.Google Scholar
Glade, M. J., and Biesik, L. M. 1986. Enhanced nitrogen retention in yearling horses supplemented with yeast culture. Journal of Animal Science 62: 1635.Google Scholar
Huber, J. T., and Higginbotham, G. E. 1985. Influence of protein level and degradability on milk yields of cows under “heat stress”. Mimeo. Department of Animal Science. University of Arizona, Tucson.Google Scholar
Wiedmeier, R. D., and Arambel, M. J. 1985. Effect of supplemental Saccharomyces cervisiae and / or Aspergillus oryzae on rumen fermentation. XVII Conference of Rumen Function. November 13-14, pp. 23. Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar