Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T03:19:14.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Appearance of the Medicean Moons in 17th Century Charts and Books—How Long Did It Take?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2010

Michael Mendillo*
Affiliation:
Department of Astronomy, Boston University, 725 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA, USA email: mendillo@bu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Galileo's talents in perspective and chiaroscuro drawing led to his images of the Moon being accepted relatively quickly as the naturalistic portrayal of a truly physical place. In contrast to his resolved views of the Moon, Galileo saw the satellites of Jupiter as only points of light (as with stars). He thus used star symbols in Sidereus Nuncius (1610) for the moons, in constrast to an open disk for Jupiter. In this paper, I describe methods used in subsequent decades to portray objects that could not be seen in any detail but whose very existence challenged the scholastic approach to science. Within fifty years, the existence of the moons was such an accepted component of astronomy that they were depicted in the highly decorative “textbook” Atlas Coelestis seu Harmonia Macrocosmica by Andreas Cellarius (1660). Other symbolic methods, ranging from the routine to the dramatic, were used in subsequent centuries to portray the moons. Actual photographs using ground-based telescopes were not possible until the 20th century, just years before cameras on spaceflight missions captured the true details of the Medicean Stars.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2010

References

Barrow, J. 2008, Cosmic Imagery: Key Images in the History of Science,(New York: W. W. Norton & Co.)Google Scholar
De Santillana, G. 1955, The Crime of Galileo, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Dollfus, A. 1998, Planet. Space Sci. 46 (8), 10371073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, S. 2001, Galileo: A Very Short Introduction, re-publication of 1980 and 1996 (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlin, P. 2004, Athanasius Kircher, The Last Man Who Knew Everything, (New York: Routledge)Google Scholar
Godwin, J. 2009, Athanasius Kircher's Theatre of the World, (Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions)Google Scholar
Kanas, N. 2007, Star Maps: History, Artistry, and Cartography, (Chichester, UK: Praxis Pub. Ltd)Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, (Chicago, University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
McCarroll, S. 2005, Celestial Images: Antiquarian Astronomical Charts and Maps from the Mendillo Collection, exhibition catalogue (S. McCarroll, Curator), Boston University Art Gallery, (Seattle: University of Washington Press)Google Scholar
Murray, J. B. 1975, Icarus, 25, 397404Google Scholar
Van Helden, A. 1989, Sidereus Nuncius or The Sideral Messenger of Galileo Galilei, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar
Vertesi, J. 2007, Stud. Hist. Phil. Soc., 38, 401421CrossRefGoogle Scholar