Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T18:41:37.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary fibre intakes of two cohorts of New Zealand adults with and without constipation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2024

H.M. Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, 8011 New Zealand
J. Maggo
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, 8011 New Zealand
C. Wall
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, 8011 New Zealand
S. Bayer
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, 8011 New Zealand
N.C. Roy
Affiliation:
Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016 New Zealand Riddet Institute, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4410, New Zealand
R. Gearry
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, 8011 New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Adequate dietary fibre (DF) intake is recommended to relieve constipation and improve gut health(1). It is often assumed that individuals with constipation have relatively low DF intake and do not meet the recommended adequate intake of 25 g and 30 g for females and males, respectively. The 2008/09 New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey confirmed that the mean DF was 17.9 grams (g) per day for females and 22.8 g per day for males, which was well below the recommended adequate intake(2). With the continuous shift of dietary patterns over time, we sought to compare the current usual DF intake of two cohorts of New Zealand adults: those who have constipation with those without constipation but with relatively low DF intake. We report baseline dietary data from two randomised controlled dietary studies (Kiwifruit Ingestion to Normalise Gut Symptoms (KINGS) (ACTRN12621000621819) and Bread Related Effects on microbiAl Distribution (BREAD) (ACTRN12622000884707)) conducted in Christchurch, New Zealand in 2021 and 2022, respectively. The KINGS study included adults with either functional constipation or constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome to consume either two green kiwifruit or maltodextrin for four weeks. The BREAD study is a crossover study and included healthy adults without constipation but with relatively low DF intake (<18 g for females, <22 g for males) to consume two types of bread with different DF content, each bread for four weeks separated by a two-week washout period. All participants completed a non-consecutive three-day food diary at baseline. Dietary data were entered into FoodWorks Online Professional (Xyris Software Australia, 2021) to assess mean daily DF intake. Fifty-six adults from the KINGS study (n = 48 females, n= 8 males; mean age ± standard deviation: 42.8 ± 12.6 years) and BREAD study (n = 33 females, n= 23 males; mean age: 40.4 ± 13.4 years) completed a baseline food diary. In the KINGS study, females with constipation had a daily mean DF intake of 25.0 ± 9.4 g whilst male participants consumed 26.9 ± 5.0 g per day. In the BREAD study, females without constipation had a mean daily DF intake of 19.4 ± 5.8 g, whereas males had 22.6 ± 8.5 g per day. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean daily DF intake between females with constipation and those without constipation (p < 0.001) but not between males (p = 0.19). These two studies found that DF intakes among females with constipation were not as relatively low as previously assumed, as they met their adequate intake of 25 g. Further data analysis from the KINGS and BREAD studies will reveal the effects of using diet to manage constipation and promote better gut health in these two cohorts of New Zealand adults.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

References

Jones, JM (2014) Nutr J 12, 13:34.10.1186/1475-2891-13-34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
University of Otago and Ministry of Health. A Focus on Nutrition: Key findings of the 2008/09 New Zealand Adult Nutrition Survey 2011 [Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/a-focus-on-nutrition-v2.pdf.Google Scholar