Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T07:16:45.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Re-evaluation of a food frequency questionnaire to estimate total n-3 fatty acid intake in primary school children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2010

I. Paciarotti
Affiliation:
Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh EH21 6UU, UK
J. McKenzie
Affiliation:
Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh EH21 6UU, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2010

Long-chain omega-3 PUFA (LC n-3 PUFA), including DHA and EPA, contribute significantly to neurological and cognitive development in children(Reference Richardson1). Dietary sources of intake of LC n-3 PUFA, however, are limited only to relatively few and less commonly eaten foods and there are currently no data available on LC n-3 PUFA intakes in primary-aged school children. Recent studies have shown that endogenous synthesis of LC n-3 PUFA from α-linolenic acid (ALA), which is abundant in the diet, is not as efficient as previously thought(Reference Burdge, Jones and Wooton2). This casts doubt on the adequacy of the supply of LC n-3 PUFA based on the conversion of ALA. In response to this evidence, food manufacturers have developed several foods fortified with ‘omega-3 fats’ marketed at parents by suggesting benefits to children's learning and behaviour. There is currently no validated method of collecting intake data. A FFQ2 was previously design to measure the n-3 PUFA intake in children with the breakdown of each single n-3 PUFA. However, the FFQ was found to underestimate ALA intake.

The aim of this study was to re-design the previous FFQ to overcome the main limitation of ALA underestimation and then re-evaluate it. Thirty-nine primary school children (16 males and 23 female), aged 5–8 years participated in the study.

A comparison with the National Diet and Nutrition Survey(Reference Gregory, Lowe and Bates3) showed that intakes of total n-3 PUFA for 5–6-year-old males (P=0.77), 5–7-year-old females (P=0.66), and 7–8-year-old males (P=0.79) were in line with the expected frequencies, whereas intakes in 7–8-year-old females were significantly lower (P<0.001). Data for total n-3 PUFA (P<0.001), ALA (P<0.001), DHA (P<0.001), were significantly greater compared to data from the previous study(Reference McGregor4), whereas intakes for and total n-3 LC PUFA (P=0.5) and EPA (P=0.22) were not significantly different. The mean intakes of total LC n-3 PUFA in both male (0.18±0.005 g/d) and female (0.18±0.04 g/d) groups, were significantly lower (P<0.001) than recommendations(5). ‘Omega-3’-fortified foods did not account for any of the total n-3 LC PUFA intake; however, 3 children (1 male, 2 female) took omega-3 supplements which accounted for 21% of the total n-3 LC PUFA intake from all children.

The study indicates that the FFQ was successful in overriding the main limitation of the original design, which involved underestimation of ALA intake. Furthermore, it illustrated that intakes of LC n-3 PUFA were far below that of recommendations. Validation of the FFQ, against a more comprehensive method of assessing dietary intake, is now fundamental to assess its accuracy.

References

1.Richardson, AJ (2004) Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in childhood developmental and psychiatric disorders. Lipids 39, 12151222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Burdge, GC, Jones, AE & Wooton, SA (2002) Eicosapentanoic and docosapentanoic acids are the principal products of α-linolenic acid metabolism in young men. Br J Nutr 88, 355363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Gregory, JR, Lowe, S, Bates, CJ et al. (2000) National Diet and Nutrition Survey: Young People Aged 4–18 Years.Volume 1: Report of the Diet and Nutrition Survey. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
4.McGregor, A (2008) Design of a food frequency questionnaire to measure n-3 fatty acids intake in children. Master Thesis, Queen Margaret University.Google Scholar
5.Scientific Advisory Commission on Nutrition and Committee on Toxicology (SACN/COT) (2004). Advice on Fish Consumption: Benefits and Risks. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar