Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T13:03:43.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Guard Chambers’: an Unquestioned Assumption in British Iron Age Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Mark Bowden
Affiliation:
English Heritage, NMRC, Kemble Drive, Swindon SN2 2GZ.

Abstract

Recesses in the entrance passages of British hillforts have been found throughout the 20th century, mainly on sites in north Wales and the Welsh Marches, though some occur elsewhere. From their first discovery they have been assumed to be ‘guard rooms’ or ‘guard chambers’ and no discussion about their function has taken place. This paper is, an attempt to start such a discussion. The idea that these recesses were necessarily of defensive use is challenged and an alternative ritual or symbolic ‘explanation’ is suggested.

Résumé

Tout au long du 20ième siècle, on a découvert des recoins dans les passages qui permettent d'accéder aux forteresses britanniques, essentiellement sur les sites du nord du Pays de Galles et des Marches galloises, bien qu'on en trouve également ailleurs. Dès leur première découverte, on a supposé que c'étaient des ‘postes de garde'ou des ‘chambres de garde’ et aucune discussion de leur fonction n'a eu lieu. Dans cette étude nous tentons de lancer la discussion. L'idée que ces recoins avaient nécessairement un usage défensif est remise en cause et on propose un rituel alternatif ou une explication symbolique.

Zusammenfassung

Unterbrechungen in den Eingangspassagen Britischer Festungen, die hauptsächlich auf Fundstellen in Nord Wales und in den Walisischen Marschen und an anderen Fundstellen vorkommen, sind immer wieder im 20. Jahrhundert beobachtet worden. Seit ihrer ersten Entdeckung wurden sie als so genannte ,Wächter Räume’ oder ,Wächter Kammern’ interpretiert; eine weitere Diskussion zu ihrer Funktion fand leider nicht statt. Dieser Beitrag stellt nun den Versuch dar, eine solche Diskussion zu initiieren. Die Vorstellung, dass diese Unterbrechungen eine Verteidigungsfunktion besaßen, wird in diesem Beitrag durch eine alternative rituelle oder symbolische Interpretation dieser Strukturen in Frag gestellt.

Résumen

A lo largo del siglo XX se han encontrado unas cavidades en los pasillos de entrada de fuertes británicos, principalmente en sitios en el norte de Gales y en los Welsh Marches, aunque hay algún ejemplo en otras partes. Desde que fueron descubiertos por vez primera, se ha supuesto que se trataba de ‘habitaciones para la guardia’ o ‘cámaras para la guardia’ sin que haya habido un debate sobre su función. Este trabajo pretende iniciar tal debate. Se cuestiona la idea que estas cavidades tuvieran un uso necesariamente defensivo y se sugiere una explicación alternativa de carácter ritual o simbólico.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alcock, L. 1965. Hillforts in Wales and the Marches. Antiquity 39, 184–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, L. 1972. By South Cadbury, is that Camelot … London: Thames &; HudsonGoogle Scholar
Avery, D.M.E. 1993. Hillfort Defences of Southern Britain. Oxford: British Archaeological Report 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avery, D.M.E., Sutton, J.E.G. & Banks, J.W. 1967. Rainsborough, Northants, England: excavations 1961–5. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 33, 207306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J.C., Freeman, P.W.M. & Woodward, A. 2000. Cadbury Castle, Somerset: the later prehistoric and early historic archaeology. London: English Heritage Archaeological Report 20Google Scholar
Bowden, M.C.B. & McOmish, D.S. 1989. Little boxes: more about hillforts. Scottish Archaeological Review 6, 1216Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 2005. Ritual and Domestic Life in Prehistoric Europe. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Brassil, K.S., Guilbert, G.C., Livens, R.G., Stead, W.H. & Bevan-Evans, M. 1982. Rescue excavations at Moel Hiraddug between 1960 and 1980. Journal of the Flintshire Historical Society 30, 1388Google Scholar
Burrow, E.J., Knowles, W.H., Paine, A.E. & Gray, J.W. 1925. Excavations on Leckhampton Hill, Cheltenham, during the summer of 1925. Transactions of the Bristol &; Gloucestershire Archaeological Society 47, 81112Google Scholar
Champion, S. 1971. Excavations on Leckhampton Hill, 1969–70 interim report. Transactions of the Bristol &; Gloucestershire Archaeological Society 90, 521Google Scholar
Champion, S. 1976. Leckhampton Hill, Gloucestershire. In Harding, 1976, 177–90Google Scholar
Cocroft, W.D., Everson, P., Jecock, M. & Wilson-North, W.R. 1989. Castle Ditch hillfort, Eddisbury, Cheshire, reconsidered: the excavations of 1935–8 in the light of recent field survey. In Bowden, M.C.B., Mackay, D.A. & Topping, P. (eds), From Cornwall to Caithness: some aspects of British field archaeology Oxford: British Archaeological Report 209, 129–36Google Scholar
Collins, A.E.P. 1947. Excavations on Blewburton Hill, 1947. Berkshire Archaeological Journal 50, 429Google Scholar
Collins, A.E.P. 1952. Excavations on Blewburton Hill, 1948–9. Berkshire Archaeological Journal 53, 2164Google Scholar
Collins, A.E.P. & Collins, F.J. 1959. Excavations on Blewburton Hill, Berks, 1953. Berkshire Archaeological Journal 57, 5273Google Scholar
Coulson, C. 2003. Castles in Medieval Society: fortresses in England, France and Ireland in the central Middle Ages. Oxford: University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunliffe, B.W. 1984. Danebury: an Iron Age hillfort in Hampshire vol 1. Excavations 1969–78: the site. London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 52Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B.W. 1991 Iron Age Communities in Britain. London: Routledge (3rd edition, revised)Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B.W. 2005, Iron Age Communities in Britain. London: Routledge (4th edition, revised)Google Scholar
Dixon, P. 1994. Crickley Hill: the hillfort defences. Nottingham: Crickley Hill Trust/University of NottinghamGoogle Scholar
Forde-Johnston, J. 1976. Hillforts of the Iron Age in England and Wales: a survey of the surface evidence. Liverpool: University PressGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. 1910. Pen-y-Corddyn, near Abergele. Archaeologia Cambrensis 10, 79156Google Scholar
Guilbert, G.C. 1977. The Northern Welsh Marches: some recent developments. In Collis, J. (ed.), The Iron Age in Britain: a review, 4150. Sheffield: Department of Prehistory & Archaeology, Sheffield UniversityGoogle Scholar
Guilbert, G.C. 1980. The guard-chamber gateways at Dinorben and Moel Hiraddug hill-forts, and the problem of dating the type in North Wales. Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies 27, 516–20Google Scholar
Guilbert, G.C. 1981. Hill-fort functions and populations: a sceptical viewpoint. In Guilbert, G.C. (ed.), Hill-fort Studies: essays for AHA Hogg, 104–21. Leicester: University PressGoogle Scholar
Harding, D.W. (ed.). 1976. Hillforts: later prehistoric earthworks in Britain and Ireland. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C. 1931. Hill-forts. Antiquity 50, 6097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C. 1976. St Catherine's Hill, Winchester: the report of 1930 re-assessed. In Harding, 1976, 5975Google Scholar
Hill, J.D. 1996. Hillforts and the Iron Age of Wessex. In Champion, T. & Collis, J. (eds), The Iron Age in Britain and Ireland: recent trends, 95116. Sheffield: J.R. Collis/University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar
Hogg, A.H.A. 1973. Hill-forts and Herefordshire. Transactions of the Woolhope Naturalist Field Club 41, 1421Google Scholar
Hogg, A.H.A. 1986. Hillfort abstracts for Welsh archaeological periodicals. Bulletin of the Board of Celtic Studies 33, 291386Google Scholar
Houlder, C. 1961. Rescue excavations at Moel Hiraddug: I – excavations in 1954–55. Journal of the Flintshire Historical Society 19, 120Google Scholar
Kenyon, K. 1942. Excavations at the Wrekin, Shropshire, 1939. Archaeological Journal 99., 99109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lock, G. 2001. Hillforts of the Ridgeway Project. Paper given at the Prehistoric Society conference. Rethinking Hillforts, Dillington House, 19 May 2001Google Scholar
Lock, G. & Gosden, C. 1997. Hillforts of the Ridgeway Project: excavations on White Horse Hill, 1995. South Midlands Archaeology 27, 64–9Google Scholar
McOmish, D.S. & Smith, N.A. 1996. Welshbury hillfort. Transactions of the Bristol & Gloucester Archaeological Society 114, 5564Google Scholar
O'Neil, B.H. St J. 1934. Excavations at Titterstone Clee Hill Camp, Shropshire. Antiquaries Journal 14, 1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papworth, M. 1994. Corfe Castle outer gatehouse excavations, 1993. The National Trust Annual Archaeological Abstracts: selected papers from National Trust archaeological staff on projects undertaken in 1993, 65–7. London: The National Trust Archaeological SurveyGoogle Scholar
Savory, H. & Gardner, W. 1964. Dinorben: a hill-fort occupied in early Iron Age and Roman times. Cardiff: National Museum of WalesGoogle Scholar
Sharples, N. 1991. Warfare in Iron Age Wessex. Scottish Archaeological Review 8, 7989Google Scholar
Stanford, S.C. 1970. Credenhill Camp, Herefordshire. Archaeological Journal 127, 82129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, S.C. 1972. Welsh border hill-forts. In Thomas, C. (ed.), The Iron Age in the Irish Sea Province, 2536London: Council for British Archaeology Research Report 9Google Scholar
Stanford, S.C. 1974. Croft Ambrey. Hereford: privately printedGoogle Scholar
Stanford, S.C. 1981. Midsummer Hill: an Iron Age hillfort on the Malverns. Hereford: privately printedGoogle Scholar
Varley, , 1952. Excavations of the Castle Ditch, Eddisbury, 1935–8. Transactions of the Historical Society of Lancashire & Cheshire 102, 168Google Scholar
Wheeler, R.E.M. 1943. Maiden Castle. Oxford: Report of the Research Committee of the Society of Anttiquaries of London 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, E.H. 1955. Bwamba Economy: the development of a primitive subsistence economy in Uganda. Kampala: East African Institute of Social ResearchGoogle Scholar
Winter, E.H. n.d. Bwamba: a structural-functional analysis of a patrilineal society. Cambridge: East African Institute of Social Research/HefferGoogle Scholar