Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:57:46.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constructing Houses and Building Context: Bersu's Manx Round-house Campaign

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Christopher Evans
Affiliation:
Cambridge Archaeological Unit, Department of Archaeology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DZ

Abstract

Bersu's war-time excavation of three ‘great’ Iron Age round-houses on the Isle of Man are considered. Their archive includes letters from colleagues (eg Hawkes and Childe) which offer unique insights into the construction of fieldwork context, particularly, in this case, a Celtic paradigm. Concerned with house studies and the possibility of ‘reconstruction’, Bersu's methodology is analysed. Site documentation shows him to be a ‘graphic archaeologist’, thinking and interpreting visually, and as such contrasts with concepts of ‘archaeology as text’.

Résumé

Les fouilles par Bersu pendant la guerre des trois “grandes“ maison rondes de l'âge du fer sur l'île de Man sont examinées. L'archive comprend des lettres par des collègues (par exemple Hawkes et Childe) qui donnent des points de vue uniques sur la construction du contexte de travail sur chantier, en particulier dans ce cas un paradigme celtique. En ce qui concerne les études des maisons et la possibilité de “reconstruction“, les méthodes de Bersu sont examinées. La documentation du site le montre comme “archéologue graphique“ qui pense et interprète visuellement et en cela fait un contraste avec des conceptions de “1'archéologie comme texte“.

Zusammenfassung

Bersus Ausgrabungen während des Krieges dreier ‘großen’ Rundhäuser aus der Bronzezeit auf der Insel Man werden hier überprüft. Ihre Archive umfassen Briefe von Kollegen (z. B. Hawkes und Childe), die eine einzigartige Einsicht in die Konstruktionen der Arbeit am Gelände gewähren, besonders in diesem Falle, da es ein keltisches Paradigma ist. Bersus Methologie, die mit den Hausstudien und der Möglichkeit die Häuser zu rekonstruieren zusammenhängt, wird analysiert. Unterlagen über das Gelände beweisen, dass er ein ‘graphischer Archäologe’ war, der bildlich denkt und auslegt und als solcher steht er im Gegensatz zu den Konzepten der ‘Archäologie im Text’.

Résumen

Este artículo examina la excavación, realizada por Bersu en tiempos de la Segunda Guerra Mundial, de tres “grandes” casas de planta redonda de la Edad del Hierro en la Isla de Man. Sus archivos incluyen cartas de colegas (como por ejemplo Hawkes y Childe) que aportan perspectivas únicas sobre la construcción de contexto de trabajo de campo, particularmente en este caso, un paradigma céltico. Se analiza la metodología de Bersu, interesado en estudios de habitación y la posibilidad de “reconstrucción”. La documentación del yacimiento revela a Bersu como “arqueólogo gráfico”, que interpretaba y pensaba visualmente, y que, como tal, choca con el concepto de “arqueología como texto”.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Barrett, J.C. 1987. The Glastonbury Lake Village: models and source criticism. Archaeological Journal 144, 409–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersu, G. 1940a. Excavations at Little Woodbury, Wiltshire. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 6, 30111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersu, G. 1940b. King Arthur's Round Table: final report, including the excavations of 1939, with an appendix on the Little Round Table. Transactions of the Cumberland & Westmoreland Antiquarian & Archaeological Society 40, 169206.Google Scholar
Bersu, G. 1946. Celtic Homesteads in the Isle of Man. Journal of the Manx Museum 5, 177–82.Google Scholar
Bersu., G. 1947. The Rath in Townland Lissue, Co. Antrim. Ulster Journal of Archaeology 10, 3058.Google Scholar
Bersu., G. 1948a. ‘Fort’ at Scotstarvit, Covert, Fife: report on excavation in 1946. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 82, 241–63.Google Scholar
Bersu, G. 1948b. Rectangular enclosure on Green Craig, Fife. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 82, 264–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bersu, G. 1977. Three Iron Age Round Houses in the Isle of Man. Douglas: Manx Museum & National Trust.Google Scholar
Bersu, G. & Griffiths, W.E. 1949. Concentric circles at Llwyn-du-Bach, Penygroes, Caernarvonshire. Archaeologia Cambrensis 100, 173206.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. 1994. The philosopher and the field archaeologist: Collingwood, Bersu and the excavation of King Arthur's Round Table. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 60, 2734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, C.J. 1977. The Shamrock and the Swastika: German espionage in Ireland in World War II. Palo Alto: Pacific Books.Google Scholar
Chappell, C. 1984. Island of Barbed Wire. London: Robert Hale.Google Scholar
Childe, V.G. 1940. Prehistoric Communities of the British Isles. London: W.R. Chambers.Google Scholar
Clark, J.G.D. 1939. Archaeology and Society (revised 1947 & 1957). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Clark, J.G.D. & Fell, C.I. 1953. The Early Iron Age site at Micklemoor Hill, West Harling. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 19, 140.Google Scholar
Clarke, D.L. 1972. A provisional model of an Iron Age society and its settlement system. In Clarke, D.L. (ed.), Models in Archaeology, 801–85. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.M. (ed.). 1992. Refugee Scholars: conversations with Tess Simpson. Leeds: Moorland Books.Google Scholar
Crawford, O.G.S. 1955. Said and Done. London: Phoenix House.Google Scholar
Cubbon, A.M. 1986. Digging up the past. In Harrison, S. (ed.), 100 Years of Heritage, 2857. Douglas: Manx Museum & National Trust.Google Scholar
Engels, M. 1884. (1972 edn) The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1988. Monuments and analogy: the interpretation of causewayed enclosures. In Burgess, C., Topping, P., Mordant, C. & Maddison, M. (eds), Enclosures and Defences in the Neolithic of Western Europe, 4773. Oxford: British Archaeological Report S403.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1989. Archaeology and modern times: Bersu's Woodbury 1938 & 1939. Antiquity 63, 436–50.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1995. Archaeology against the state: roots of internationalism. In Ucko, P. (ed.), Theory in Archaeology: a world perspective, 312–26. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans, C. 1998. Historicism, chronology and Straw Men: Situating Hawkes' Ladder of Inference. Antiquity 72, 398404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. forthcoming. Model Excavations: text, context and graphic literacy.Google Scholar
Gantz, J. (trans.) 1976. The Mabinogion. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gelling, P. 1972. The hill-fort on South Barrule and its position in the Manx Iron Age. In Lynch, F. & Burgess, C. (eds), Prehistoric Man in Wales and the West, 285–92. Bath: Adams & Dart.Google Scholar
Gelling, P. 1978. The Iron Age. In Davey, P. (ed.), Man and Environment in the Isle of Man, 233–43. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports 54.Google Scholar
Gillman, P. & Gillman, L. 1980. Collar the Lot!. London.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C. 1942. Race, prehistory, and European civilization. Man 42, 125–30.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C. 1943. The future of discovery: archaeology at home. In Peers, C., Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Archaeology, 912. London: Institute of Archaeology Occasional Paper 5.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C.F.C. 1954. Archaeological theory and method: some suggestions from the Old World. American Anthropologist 56, 155–68.Google Scholar
Hawkes, J. 1946. The Beginning of History: a film. Antiquity 20, 7882.Google Scholar
Hawkes, J. & Hawkes, C.F.C. 1947. Prehistoric Britain. 2nd edn. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Hemp, W.J. & Gresham, C.A. 1944. Hut-circles in north-west Wales. Antiquity 18, 183–96.Google Scholar
Hill, J.D. 1996. Hill-forts and the Iron Age of Wessex. In Champion, T.C. & Collis, J.R. (eds.), The Iron Age in Britain and Ireland: recent trends, 95116. Sheffield: J.R. Collis.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1986. Reading the Past. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 1989. Writing archaeology: The site report in context. Antiquity 63, 268–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, K.H. 1964. The Oldest Irish Tradition: a window on the Iron Age. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Kochan, M. 1983. Britain's Internees in the Second World War. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oelmann, F. 1927. Die Grundformen des Hausbaus. Berlin: Haus und Hof in Altertum — Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Antiken Wohnbau 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, C.W. 1987. My Life in Archaeology. Gloucester: Alan Sutton.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1959. Approaches to Archaeology. London: Adam & Charles Black.Google Scholar
Quennell., M. & Quennell, C.H.B. 1922. Everyday Life in the New Stone, Bronze and Early Iron Ages. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
Ridgeway, W. 1905. The date of the first shaping of the Cuchulainn Saga. Proceedings of the British Academy 2, 135–68.Google Scholar
Rolleston, T.W. 1919. Myths and Legends of the Celtic Race. London: Harrap.Google Scholar
Selkirk, A. 1971. The Isle of Man (1): the story of Gerhard Bersu. Current Archaeology 3, 8892.Google Scholar
Squire, C. 1910. The Mythology of the British Islands: an introduction to Celtic myth, legend, poetry and romance. London: Blackie.Google Scholar
Stone, J.F.S. 1958. Wessex Before the Celts. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Strong, W.D. 1935. An Introduction to Nebraska Archaeology. Washington: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 93.Google Scholar
Webster, D. 1991. Hawkeseye: The early life of Christopher Hawkes. Stroud: Alan Sutton.Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. 1954. Archaeology from the Earth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar