Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T21:06:03.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prehistoric Boats, Timber, and Woodworking Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2014

Sean McGrail
Sean McGrail
Affiliation:
Archaeological Research Centre, National Maritime Museum, Greenwich
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The recent paper by Coles et al. (1978) on the use and character of prehistoric timber is a most timely reminder that the study of wooden artifacts can make a significant contribution to our understanding of early man. This potential may never be realised, however, unless full records are compiled on site whilst the artifacts are maintained in a stable state by ‘passive’ conservation techniques, and samples of the timber are recovered for post-excavation research. In the past much information has been irretrievably lost because these actions were not taken. It is also necessary to be cautious before accepting that wooden artifacts excavated or found before, say, 1960 are necessarily from the period ascribed to them. Not all simple artifacts are prehistoric.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 45 , December 1979 , pp. 159 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bulleid, A., 1893. ‘Ancient canoe found near Glastonbury’, Somerset and Dorset Notes and Queries 3, 121.Google Scholar
Bulleid, A., 1906. ‘Prehistoric boat found at Shapwick, 1906’, Proceedings of the Somersetshire Archaeologic and Natural History Society 52, 51–54.Google Scholar
Bulleid, A., and Gray, H. St. G., 1911. Glastonbury Lake-Village Vol. 1, Glastonbury.Google Scholar
Coles, J. M., Heal, S. V. E. and Orme, B. J., 1978. ‘Use and character of wood in Prehistoric Britain and Ireland’, PPS 44, 1–45.Google Scholar
Fox, C., 1926. ‘Dugout canoe from South Wales’, Antiq. J. 6, 121–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geikie, J., 1879. ‘Discovery of an ancient canoe in the old alluvium of the Tay at Perth’, Scottish Naturalist 5, 1–7.Google Scholar
McGrail, S., 1975. ‘Brigg “raft” re-excavated’, Lincolnshire History and Archaeology 10, 5–13.Google Scholar
McGrail, S., 1978a. Logboats of England and Wales. Brit. Archaeol. Rep. 51. National Maritime Museum Archaeological Series No. 2.Google Scholar
McGrail, S., 1978b. ‘Dating ancient wooden boats’. In Fletcher, J. (ed.), Dendrochronology in Europe. Brit. Archaeol. Rep. S51. National Maritime Museum Archaeological Series No. 4, 239–258.Google Scholar
McGrail, S. and Switsur, R., 1975. ‘Early British boats and their chronology’. Internat. J. Nautical Archaeol. 4, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrail, S. and Switsur, R., forthcoming. ‘Medieval logboats of the River Mersey’ to be published by Brit. Archaeol. Rep. (Oxford) in the proceedings of the Bremerhaven Symposium on Boat Archaeology.Google Scholar
Marshall, W., 1878–1979. ‘On an ancient canoe found imbedded in the fen-peat near Magdalen Bend on the River Ouse in the County of Norfolk’, Cambridge Antiquarian Communications 4, 195–206.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. M., 1966. ‘A medieval boat from Kentmere, Westmorland’, Medieval Archaeology 10, 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, E. V., 1976. North Ferriby boats. National Maritime Museum Monograph No. 23, Greenwich.Google Scholar
Wright, E. V., 1978. ‘Artifacts from the boat-site at North Ferriby, Humberside, England’, PPS 44, 187–202.Google Scholar