Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:42:36.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Production and Distribution of Mesolithic Axes in Southern England

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2014

Verna Care
Verna Care
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ethnographic data has been used to show that ‘most differences between hunters and farmers are a matter of degree, and there is no sharp dividing line between the two means of subsistence’ (Orme 1977, 46). The early Neolithic of southern England, as defined from the archaeological record, is likely to reflect the adaptations of a mature techno-economic system to an environment already much altered by the activities of late Mesolithic groups and immigrant pioneer ‘agriculturalists’. Case has shown the need for a long period of pioneer activity during which contact with indigenous groups would have taken place and hunting and gathering provided an essential supplementary means of subsistence (1969). By the later Mesolithic, internal population growth and the spread of closed forest, which affected the availability of food resources, may have created internal pressures on the mobile hunter-gatherer subsistence base (Jacobi 1978, Evans 1975). Zones of particularly rich resources, such as the Kennet and Thames valley, may have provided conditions which allowed a reduction in group mobility. Attempts may also have been made in other areas to increase the resources available by limited forest clearance, more controlled use of plant resources, and an increase in the exploitation of coastal environments (Jacobi 1973 and 1978, Mellars 1976, Clarke 1976). Thus, during the crucial period of contact both systems were under stress, and it is no longer valid to attempt to identify a Late Mesolithic with a purely hunter-gatherer economy which was rapidly replaced by a homogeneous group of sedentary agriculturalists with a distinct artifact assemblage.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 45 , December 1979 , pp. 93 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bailloud, G. 1974. Le Néolithique dans le Bassin Parisien. 2nd ed. Paris.Google Scholar
Baker, C. 1978. ‘The Size Effect: an explanation of variability in surface artifact assemblage content’, American Antiquity 43, (2), 288–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batstone, R. F. S. 1943. ‘Mesolithic flints from Epsom Downs and Ewell’, Surrey Archaeol. Coll. 48, 150–1.Google Scholar
Bender, B. 1978. ‘Gatherer-hunter to farmer: a social perspective’, World Archaeol. 10 (2), 204–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkin, J. B. 1924. ‘Pygmy and other flint implements found at Peacehaven“, Sussex Archaeol. Coll. 45, 224–41.Google Scholar
Case, H. 1969. ‘Neolithic Explanations’, Antiquity 43, 176–86.Google Scholar
Cauvin, C. 1971. ‘Recherches recentes sur le phenomene Campignien en France’, in Lyning, J. ed. Die Anfänge des Neolithikums vom Orient bis Nordeurope Part VI. Frankreich.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D. 1932. The Mesolithic Age in Britain.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. C. 1976. ‘Mesolithic Europe: the economic basis’, in Sieveking, G. de G., Longworth, I. H., and Wilson, K. E. (eds.), Problems in Economic and Social Archaeology, 449–81.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, B. 1973. ‘Chalton, Hants.: the evolution of a landscape’, Antiq. J. 53, 176–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, C. 1968. ‘Mesolithic distribution in south-east Hampshire’, Proc. Hants. Field Club and Archaeol. Soc. 23, 110–19.Google Scholar
Elliot, K., Ellman, D. and Hodder, I. 1978. ‘The simulation of Neolithic axe dispersal in Britain’, in Hodder, (ed.), Simulation Studies in Archaeology, 79–87.Google Scholar
Evans, J. G. 1975. The Environment of Early Man in the British Isles.Google Scholar
Evens, E. D., Smith, I. F. and Wallis, F. S. 1972. ‘The petrological identification of stone implements from South-Western England. 5th report of the sub-committee of the South Western Federation of Museums and Art Galleries’, PPS 38, 235–276.Google Scholar
Froom, F. R. 1976. Wawcott III: a stratified Mesolithic succession. British Archaeol. Report 27.Google Scholar
Hodder, I., 1974. ‘Regression analysis of some trade and marketing patterns’, World Archaeol. 6, 172–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, W. 1933. ‘The Pygmy flint industries of Surrey’, Surrey Archaeol. Coll. 41, 50–78.Google Scholar
Hughes, M. and ApSimon, A. 1978. ‘A Mesolithic flint working site on the south coast motorway (M27): near Fort Wallington, Fareham, Hampshire’, Hants. Field Club and Archaeol. Soc. 34, 23–35.Google Scholar
Jacobi, R. M. 1973. ‘Aspects of the “Mesolithic Age” in Great Britain’, in Kozlowski, (ed), The Mesolithic in Europe, 237–65.Google Scholar
Jacobi, R. M. 1978. ‘Population and landscape in Mesolithic lowland Britain’, in Limbrey, S. and Evans, J. G. (eds.), The effect of man on the landscape: the Lowland zone. C.B.A. Research report 21, 75–85.Google Scholar
Keef, P. A. M., Wymer, J. J. and Dimbleby, G. W. 1965. ‘A Mesolithic site on Iping Common, Sussex, England’, PPS 31, 85–92.Google Scholar
Kendall, H. G. O. 1916. ‘Excavations on Hackpen Hill, Wilts.’, Proc. Soc. Antiq. Lond. 2nd series 28, 26–48.Google Scholar
Kendall, H. G. O. 1919. ‘Windmill Hill, Avebury and Grimes Graves: cores and choppers’, PPSEA 3, 104–8.Google Scholar
Laidler, B. and Young, W. E. V. 1938. ‘A surface flint industry from a site near Stonehenge’, Wilts. Archaeol. Mag. 48, 150–160.Google Scholar
Lawrence, G. F. 1929. ‘Antiquities from the Middle Thames’, Archaeol. J. 86 (2nd series, 36), 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellars, P. 1976. ‘Fire ecology, animal populations and man: a study of some ecological relationships in prehistory’, PPS 42, 15–47.Google Scholar
Mellars, P. and Reinhardt, S. C. 1978. ‘Patterns of Mesolithic land-use in southern England: a geological perspective’, in Mellars, P. (ed), The Early Post-glacial settlement of Northern Europe.Google Scholar
Newell, R. R. 1970. ‘The flint industry of the Dutch Linearbandkeramik’ Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 3, 144–83.Google Scholar
Orme, B. 1977. ‘The advantages of agriculture’, in Megaw, J. V. S. (ed), Hunters, Gatherers and First Farmers beyond Europe.Google Scholar
Palmer, S. 1970. ‘The Stone Age industries on the Isle of Portland, Dorset, and the utilisation of Portland chert as artifact material in Southern England’, PPS 36, 82–116.Google Scholar
Piggott, S. 1954. The Neolithic cultures of the British Isles.Google Scholar
Pitt-Rivers, A. H. L. F. 1890. King John's House, Tollard Royal, Wiltshire.Google Scholar
Pitts, M. 1978. ‘Towards an understanding of flint industries in post-glacial England’ Instit. of Archaeol. Bulletin (London) 15, 179–99.Google Scholar
Rankine, W. F. 1939. ‘Mesolithic and Neolithic studies’, in A Surveyof the prehistory of the Farnham District. Surrey Archaeol. Soc., 61–132.Google Scholar
Rankine, W. F. 1949. ‘Mesolithic survey of the West Surrey Greensand’, Research Papers of the Surrey Archaeol. Soc. no. 2.Google Scholar
Rankine, W. F. 1952. ‘A Mesolithic chipping floor at the Warren, Oakhanger, Selborne, Hants.’, PPS 18, 21–35.Google Scholar
Rankine, W. F. 1956. ‘The Mesolithic of Southern England’, Research Papers of the Surrey Archaeol. Soc. no. 4.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1975. ‘Trade as action at a distance: questions of integration and communication’, in Ancient Civilisation and Trade ed. Sabloff, J. A. and Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C., 3–59.Google Scholar
Saville, A. 1977. ‘Two mesolithic implement types’, Northamptonshire Archaeol. 12, 3–8.Google Scholar
Smith, I. 1963. ‘Transversely sharpened axe from Cornwall’, PPS 29, 429.Google Scholar
Summers, P. 1941. ‘A Mesolithic site near Iwerne Minster, Dorset’, PPS 7, 145–6.Google Scholar
Tarrête, J. 1977. ‘Le Montmorencien’, Gallia Prehistoric 10th Supplement.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. C. 1958. ‘The Palaeolithic and Mesolithic periods in Cornwall’, Proc. West Cornwall Field Club 2(2).Google Scholar
White, D. A. 1971. ‘Early Man in Cranborne Chase’, Proc. Dorset Nat. Hist. and Archaeol. Soc. 93, 176–82.Google Scholar
White, D. A. 1973. ‘The excavation of three round barrows on Chaldon Down, Dorset 1969’, Proc. Dorset Nat. Hist. and Archaeol. Soc. 95, 34–43.Google Scholar
Whittle, A. 1977. The earlier Neolithic of Southern England and its Continental background, British Archaeol. Report supplementary series no. 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, P. 1976. ‘The Irish Mesolithic/Neolithic transition’, In de Laet, S. J. (ed), Acculturation and Continuity in Atlantic Europe, 296–307.Google Scholar
Woodman, P. 1978. The Mesolithic in Ireland. British Archaeol. Reports no. 58.Google Scholar
Wymer, J. J. (ed), 1977. Gazetteer of Mesolithic Sites in England and Wales. CBA Research report no. 20.Google Scholar
Yellen, J. E. 1977. Archaeological approaches to the present: models for reconstructing the past. New York.Google Scholar