Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T10:48:46.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Recent British Shield Finds and their Continental Parallels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2014

Stuart Needham
Stuart Needham
Affiliation:
Department of Prehistoric and Romano-British Antiquities, British Museum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the course of research on Bronze Age metalwork from Surrey 1972–4, the writer's attention was drawn to an unpublished bronze shield in Chertsey Museum found locally at Mixnam's Pit several years earlier. The find obviously did not fall into any known British type, and closer parallels evident amongst the continental Nipperweise class made this, potentially, the first recognised import of a Bronze Age shield to Britain. With the aid of the Sir Cyril Fox Memorial Award for 1974, it was possible to study continental bronze shields in West Germany and Denmark, in particular three of the five known examples of Nipperweise type. Subsequently, in June 1977, by curious chance, a second British Nipperweise-like shield was recovered at Long Wittenham, and this has amplified the need for a detailed consideration of relationships within the class. First, however, it is necessary to describe the two British shields and their find circumstances, and to give descriptions of the relevant continental examples.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 45 , December 1979 , pp. 111 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Almagro, M., 1957–1958. ‘A Propósito de la Fecha de las Fíbulas de Huelva’, Ampurias, 19–20, 198–206.Google Scholar
Anati, E., 1961. Camonica Valley. New York.Google Scholar
Armstrong, E. C. R., 1908–1909. ‘Prehistoric leather shield found at Clonbrin, Co. Longford’, P.R.I.A., 27, 259–62.Google Scholar
Bouzek, J., 1968. ‘Einige Bermerkungen zum Beginn der Nipperweise-Schilde’, Germania, 46, 313–6.Google Scholar
Burgess, C. B., Coombs, D. and Davies, G., 1972. ‘The Broadward complex and barbed spearheads’. In Lynch, F. and Burgess, C. B. (ed.), Prehistoric Man in Wales and the West, 211–82. Bath.Google Scholar
Butler, J. J., 1963. ‘Bronze Age connections across the North Sea’, Palaeohistoria, 9, 127–31.Google Scholar
Coles, J. M., 1962. ‘European Bronze Age shields’, PPS, 28, 156–90.Google Scholar
Coles, J. M., 1967. ‘The Plzeň shield: a problem in Nordic and East Mediterranean relations’, Germania, 45, 151–3.Google Scholar
Coombs, D., 1975. ‘Bronze Age weapon hoards in Britain’, Archaeol. Atlantica, 1, pt 1, 49–81.Google Scholar
Davey, P. J., 1973. ‘Bronze Age metalwork from Lincolnshire’, Arch. 104, 51–127.Google Scholar
Fox, C., 1923. The Archaeology of the Cambridge region. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gräslund, B., 1967. ‘The Herzsprung shield type and its origin’, Acta Arch., 38, 59–71.Google Scholar
Grimes, W. F., 1960. Excavations on Defence sites 1939–45, I: mainly Neolithic and Bronze Age. Ministry of Works Archaeological Reports no. 3.Google Scholar
Hencken, H., 1950. ‘Herzsprung shields and Greek trade’, American J. Arch., 54, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hencken, H., 1971. The Earliest Helmets. Bull. 28, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Hennig, H., 1970. Die Grab- und Hortfunde der Urnenfelderkultur aus Ober- und Mittelfranken. Bayerisches Landesamt fur Denkmalpflege, Heft 23.Google Scholar
Kytlicová, O., 1964. ‘K Časovému Zařazeni Depotu Horizontu Plzeň-Jikalka’, Arch. Rozhledy, 16, 516–56.Google Scholar
Needham, S. P., 1977. ‘Three Surrey bronzes in Picton Museum, Ontario, Canada’, Surrey Arch. Soc. Bulletin no. 140, 3–4.Google Scholar
O'Connor, B. J., 1978. Relations between Britain, north-eastern France and the Low Countries during the Later Bronze and Early Iron Age, with particular reference to the metalwork. Unpublished D.Phil., Oxford.Google Scholar
Patay, P., 1968. ‘Urnenfelderzeitliche Bronzeschilde im Karpatenbecken’, Germania, 46, 241–8.Google Scholar
Pingel, V., 1974. ‘Bemerkungen zu den Ritzverzierten Stelen und zur Beginnenden Eisenzeit im Süd-westen der Iberischen Halbinsel’, Hamburger Beiträge zur Archäologie 4, 1–19.Google Scholar
Reinecke, P., 1956. ‘Der Bamberger Bronzeschildfund’, Jahr. R-G. Z. Mainz, 3, 23–7.Google Scholar
Rowlands, M. J., 1976. The Organisation of Middle Bronze Age Metalworking. Brit. Archaeol. Rep., 31.Google Scholar
Schauer, P., 1975. ‘Die BewafFnung der Adelskrieger während der Späten Bronze-und Frühen Eisenzeit’, Ausgrab. Deutschl., 3, 305–12. Mainz.Google Scholar
Sprockhoff, E., 1930. Zur Handelgeschichte der Germanischen Bronzezeit. Vorgeschichtliche Forschungen, Heft 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrane, H., 1975. Europaeiske Forbindelser (European connections). Arkaeologisk-historisk raekke, Bind 16, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Wegner, G., 1976. Die Vorgeschichtlichen Flussfunde aus dem Main und aus dem Rhein bei Mainz. Bayerisches Landesamt fur Denkmalpflege, Heft 30.Google Scholar