Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-l69ms Total loading time: 0.24 Render date: 2022-08-16T14:20:45.610Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true
  • English
PS: Political Science & Politics PS: Political Science & Politics

Article contents

Collaboration in Commissioned Research: Benefits and Challenges of Scholar–Practitioner Partnerships in Conflict Contexts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2021

Drew Mikhael Open the ORCID record for Drew Mikhael[Opens in a new window]  and
Julie Norman Open the ORCID record for Julie Norman[Opens in a new window]
Drew Mikhael
Affiliation:
Queen’s University Belfast
Julie Norman
Affiliation:
University College London
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Quantitative and Qualitative Collaborative Methodologies
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 554 - 557
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asiamah, Gildfred, Awal, Mohammed S., and MacLean, Lauren M.. 2021. “Collaboration for Designing, Conceptualizing and (Possibly) Decolonizing Research in African Politics.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleck, Jaimie, Dendere, Chipo, and Sangaré, Boukary. 2018. “Making North–South Research Collaborations Work.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 554–58.Google Scholar
Cyr, Jennifer. 2021. “Collaborative Methodology from a Skeptical but Nonetheless Sympathetic Point of View.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firchow, Pamina, and Gellman, Mneesha. 2021. “Collaborative Methodologies: Why, How, and for Whom?” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellman, Mneesha. 2021. “Collaborative Methodology with Indigenous Communities: A Framework for Addressing Power Inequalities.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ham, Vince. 1999. “Tracking the Truth or Selling One’s Soul? Reflections on the Ethics of a Piece of Commissioned Research.” British Journal of Educational Studies 47 (3): 275–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Oliver. 2021. “Balancing Rigor and Relationships in Collaborative Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics. doi: 10.1017/S1049096521000305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelitch, Kristin. 2018. “Whose Research Is It? Political Scientists Discuss Whether, How, and Why We Should Involve the Communities We Study.” PS: Political Science & Politics 51 (3): 543–45.Google Scholar
Pugh, Michael. 2004. “Peacekeeping and Critical Theory.” International Peacekeeping 11 (1): 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, Marina, and Hostettler, Ueli. 2015. “Conducting Commissioned Research in Neoliberal Academia: The Conditions Evaluations Impose on Research Practice.” Current Sociology 63 (4): 493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Collaboration in Commissioned Research: Benefits and Challenges of Scholar–Practitioner Partnerships in Conflict Contexts
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Collaboration in Commissioned Research: Benefits and Challenges of Scholar–Practitioner Partnerships in Conflict Contexts
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Collaboration in Commissioned Research: Benefits and Challenges of Scholar–Practitioner Partnerships in Conflict Contexts
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *