Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-ns2hh Total loading time: 0.295 Render date: 2022-10-04T23:16:08.863Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

The Desperation Argument for Geoengineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2013

Stephen M. Gardiner*
Affiliation:
University of Washington

Extract

Geoengineering has been roughly defined as “the intentional manipulation of planetary systems at a global scale” (Keith 2000; Schelling 1996). This definition is neither as precise nor as informative as some would like. Nevertheless, we can fix ideas by focusing on the most prominent current proposal, which is to inject sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere to deflect incoming radiation and so cool the Earth's surface. This is a paradigm case: if anything counts as geoengineering, stratospheric sulfate injection (hereafter SSI) does.

Type
Symposium: Climate Change Justice
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arctic Methane Emergency Group. 2012. “Declaration of Emergency.” Available at: http://www.ameg.me/index.php/about-ameg/13-ameg-declaration-of-emergency.Google Scholar
Blackstock, J.J., Battisti, D.S., Caldeira, K., Eardley, D.M, Katz, J.I., Keith, D.W., Patrinos, A. N., Schrag, D.P., Socolow, R.H., and Koonin, S.E.. 2009. Climate Engineering Responses to Climate Emergencies. Novim Group, Santa Barbara, 29 July: viii.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Kenneth, and Keith, David. 2010. “The Need for Climate Engineering Research.” Issues in Science and Technology 57: 5762.Google Scholar
Corner, Adam, and Pidgeon, Nick. 2010. “Geoengineering the Climate: The Social and Ethical Implications.” Environment 25 (1): 2437.Google Scholar
Crutzen, Paul. 2006. “Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulphur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma?Climatic Change 77: 211–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen. M.Forthcoming. “Geoengineering and Moral Schizophrenia: What's the Question?” In Climate Change Geoengineering, ed. Burns, Wil and Strauss, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen. M. 2011. A Perfect Moral Storm: the Ethical Challenge of Climate Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen. M. 2010. “Is ‘Arming the Future’ with Geoengineering Really the Lesser Evil?” In Climate Ethics: Essential Readings, ed. Gardiner, S., Caney, S., Jamieson, D., and Shue, H., 284312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keith, David. 2000. “Geoengineering: History and Prospect.” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25: 245–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolt, John. 2011. “Greenhouse Gas Emission and the Domination of Posterity.” In The Ethics of Global Climate Change, ed. Arnold, Denis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Preston, Christopher. 2012a. “The Extraordinary Ethics of Solar Radiation Management.” In The Ethics of Solar Radiation Management, 111. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Preston, Christopher. Ed. 2012b. The Ethics of Solar Radiation Management. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1996. “The Economic Diplomacy of Geoengineering.” Climatic Change 33: 303–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, John, Caldeira, Ken, Cox, Peter, Haigh, Joanna, Keith, David, Launder, Brian, Mace, Georgina, MacKerron, Gordon, Pyle, John, Rayner, Steve, Redgwell, Catherine, and Watson, Andrew. 2009. Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
Smith, Patrick. 2012. “Domination and the Ethics of Solar Radiation Management.” In The Ethics of Solar Radiation Management, 4361. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Specter, Michael. 2012. “Is There a Technological Solution to Global Warming?New Yorker, May 14.Google Scholar
22
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Desperation Argument for Geoengineering
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Desperation Argument for Geoengineering
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Desperation Argument for Geoengineering
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *