Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T23:11:21.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does Time Heal All Wounds? Sex Scandals, Tax Evasion, and the Passage of Time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 April 2014

David Doherty
Affiliation:
Loyola University Chicago
Conor M. Dowling
Affiliation:
University of Mississippi
Michael G. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Springfield

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Political Scandal in American Politics
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1988. “Explaining Senate Election Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 82: 385403.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1991. “Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 53: 3456.Google Scholar
Barabas, Jason, and Jerit, Jennifer. 2010. “Are Survey Experiments Externally Valid?American Political Science Review 104: 226–42.Google Scholar
Basinger, Scott J. 2013. “Scandals and Congressional Elections in the Post-Watergate Era.” Political Research Quarterly 66: 385–98.Google Scholar
Basinger, Scott J., and Rottinghaus, Brandon. 2012. “Stonewalling: Explaining Presidential Behavior During Scandal.” Political Research Quarterly 65: 290302.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Using Mechanical Turk as a Subject Recruitment Tool for Experimental Research. Political Analysis 20: 351–68.Google Scholar
Berinsky, Adam J., Hutchings, Vincent L., Mendelberg, Tali, Shaker, Lee, and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 2011. “Sex and Race: Are Black Candidates More Likely to be Disadvantaged by Sex Scandals?Political Behavior 33: 179202.Google Scholar
Brown, Lara M. 2001. “The Character of Congress: Scandals in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1966-1996.” PhD dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Brown, Lara M. 2006. “Revisiting the Character of Congressional Scandals in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1966–2002.” Journal of Political Marketing 5: 149–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Lara M. 2007. “It’s Good to Be an Incumbent: Scandals, Corruption, and the 2006 Midterm Election.” Extension of Remarks, APSA Legislative Studies’ Section Newsletter, Vol. 30, No. 1 (January).Google Scholar
Carlson, James, Ganiel, Gladys, and Hyde, Mark S.. 2000. “Scandal and Political Candidate Image.” Southeastern Political Review 28: 747–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, David, Dowling, Conor M., and Miller, Michael G.. 2011. “Are Financial or Moral Scandals Worse? It Depends.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (4): 749–57.Google Scholar
Funk, Carolyn L. 1996. “The Impact of Scandal on Candidate Evaluations: An Experimental Test of the Role of Candidate Traits.” Political Behavior 18: 124.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Timothy, and Krehbiel, Keith. 1994. “Golden Parachutes, Rubber Checks, and Strategic Retirements from the 102nd House.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 7599.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Dimock, Michael A.. 1994. “Checking Out: The Effects of Bank Overdrafts on the 1992 House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 38: 601–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerit, Jennifer, Barabas, Jason, and Clifford, Scott. 2013. “Comparing Contemporaneous Laboratory and Field Experiments on Media Effects.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77: 256–82.Google Scholar
Hummel, Patrick. 2010. “Flip-Flopping from Primaries to General Elections.” Journal of Public Economics 94: 1020–27.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Jeffrey. 2008. “Incumbent Vulnerability and Challenger Entry in Statewide Elections.” American Politics Research 36: 108–29.Google Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M. 1990. “Avoiding Blame: An Experimental Investigation of Political Excuses and Justifications.” British Journal of Political Science 20: 119–31.Google Scholar
McGraw, Kathleen M. 1991. “Managing Blame: An Experimental Test of the Effects of Political Accounts.” American Political Science Review 85: 1133–57.Google Scholar
Miller, Beth. 2010. “The Effects of Scandalous Information on Recall of Policy-Related Information.” Political Psychology 31: 887914.Google Scholar
Peters, John G., and Welch, Susan. 1980. “The Effects of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 74: 697708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, David, A. M. and Vonnahme, Beth Miller. 2014. “Aww, Shucky, Ducky: Voter Response to Accusations of Herman Cain’s ‘Inappropriate Behavior’.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47(2): this issue.Google Scholar
Praino, Rodrigo, Stockemer, Daniel, and Moscardelli, Vincent G.. 2013. “The Lingering Effect of Scandals in Congressional Elections: Incumbents, Challengers, and Voters.” Social Science Quarterly. DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, Michael K. 2014. “Tuning in to Scandal: Television News Coverage of Congressional Scandals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47(2): this issue.Google Scholar
Rottinghaus, Brandon. 2014. “Monkey Business: The Effect of Scandals on Presidential Primary Nominations.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47(2): this issue.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John R.. 1997. “The Effects of Charges of Corruption on Voting Behavior in Congressional Elections, 1982–1990.” Journal of Politics 59: 226–39.Google Scholar