Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-9th95 Total loading time: 0.3 Render date: 2022-12-06T20:15:20.913Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Engaging and Disrupting Power: The Public Value of Political Ethnography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2017

M. David Forrest*
Affiliation:
Oberlin College

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium: Ethnography and Participant Observation: Political Science Research in this “Late Methodological Moment”
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2009. “How to Tell an Axe Murderer: An Essay on Ethnography, Truth, and Lies.” In Political Ethnography, ed. Schatz, Edward, 5373. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beltrán, Cristina. 2010. The Trouble with Unity: Latino Politics and the Creation of Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burawoy, Michael, Burton, Alice, Ferguson, Ann Arnett, Fox, Kathryn J., Gamson, Joshua, Gartrell, Nadine, et al. 1991. Ethnography Unbound: Power and Resistance in the Modern Metropolis. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cohn, Carol. 1987. “Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals.” Signs 12: 687718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, James M. 2015. Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Volo, Bayard and Schatz, Edward. 2004. “From the Inside Out: Ethnographic Methods in Political Research.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37: 267–71.Google Scholar
Forrest, M. David. 2014. “Dilemmas of Political Representation: Antipoverty Advocacy in the Post–Civil Rights Era.” Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, PhD dissertation.
Forrest, M. David. 2016. “For a Ruthless Criticism of US Politics.” Polity 48: 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattam, Victoria. 2000. “History, Agency, and Political Change.” Polity 32: 333–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
hooks, bell. 2000. Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. 2nd edition. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Cedric. 2007. Revolutionaries to Race Leaders: Black Power and the Making of African American Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 2014. “What Is the Value of Social Science? Challenges for Researchers and Government Funders.” PS: Political Science and Politics 47: 17.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur and Aldrich, John H.. 2015. “How Political Science Can Better Communicate Its Value: 12 Recommendations from the APSA Task Force.” PS: Political Science and Politics 48 (Special Issue): 119.Google Scholar
Lyon-Callo, Vincent and Hyatt, Susan Brin. 2003. “The Neoliberal State and the Depoliticization of Poverty: Activist Anthropology and ‘Ethnography from Below.’” Urban Anthropology 32: 175204.Google Scholar
Majic, Samantha. 2014. Sex Work Politics: From Protest to Service Provision. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pachirat, Timothy. 2009. “The Political in Political Ethnography: Dispatches from the Kill Floor.” In Political Ethnography, ed. Schatz, Edward, 143–61. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sangtin, Writers and Nagar, Richa. 2006. Playing with Fire: Feminist Thought and Activism through Seven Lives in India. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schatz, Edward. 2009. “Ethnographic Immersion and the Study of Politics.” In Political Ethnography, ed. Schatz, Edward, 122. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, Sanford F. 1995. Words of Welfare: The Poverty of Social Science and the Social Science of Poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Schram, Sanford F. 2002. Praxis for the Poor: Piven and Cloward and the Future of Social Science in Social Welfare. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Schram, Sanford F. 2015. The Return of Ordinary Capitalism: Neoliberalism, Precarity, Occupy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wedeen, Lisa. 2009. “Ethnography as Interpretive Enterprise.” In Political Ethnography, ed. Schatz, Edward, 7593. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Engaging and Disrupting Power: The Public Value of Political Ethnography
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Engaging and Disrupting Power: The Public Value of Political Ethnography
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Engaging and Disrupting Power: The Public Value of Political Ethnography
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *