Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-mqrwx Total loading time: 0.223 Render date: 2022-12-06T00:16:52.495Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

The Gerrymanderers Are Coming! Legislative Redistricting Won't Affect Competition or Polarization Much, No Matter Who Does It

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2012

Seth E. Masket
Affiliation:
University of Denver
Jonathan Winburn
Affiliation:
University of Mississippi
Gerald C. Wright
Affiliation:
Indiana University

Abstract

Redistricting received substantial attention in the popular media in 2011, as states redrew state legislative and congressional district boundaries. Many reformers continue to argue for a de-politicization of the redistricting process, claiming that partisan redistricting is responsible for declining electoral competition and increasing legislative polarization. Our analysis of evidence from state legislatures during the last decade suggests that the effects of partisan redistricting on competition and polarization are small, considerably more nuanced than reformers would suggest, and overwhelmed by other aspects of the political environment.

Type
Features
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I., Alexander, Brad, and Gunning, Matthew. 2006. “Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Politics 68: 7588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William, Berkman, Michael, and Schneiderman, Stuart. 2000. “Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries.” American Political Science Review 94: 859–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Alleen. 2011. “Looking to the People to Fix a Broken Redistricting System.” Twin Cities Daily Planet, August 23.Google Scholar
Dyckman, Martin. 2003. “In Florida, We Don't Choose Our Legislators, They Choose Us.” St. Petersburg Times. October 12, D3.Google Scholar
Eilperin, Juliet. 2006. “The Gerrymander that Ate America.” Slate Magazine, April 17, http://www.slate.com/id/2140054/.Google Scholar
Forgette, Richard, Garner, Andrew, and Winkle, John. 2009. “Do Redistricting Principles and Practices Affect U.S. State Legislative Electoral Competition?State Politics and Policy Quarterly 9: 151–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Steven. 2002. “Behind Closed Doors: The Recurring Plague of Redistricting and the Politics of Geography.” National Civic Review 91: 317–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Los Angeles Times staff, 2005. “Times Endorsement: A New Political Landscape.” Los Angeles Times, October 23, M4.Google Scholar
Lublin, David, and McDonald, Michael P.. 2006. “Is It Time to Draw the Line? The Impact of Redistricting on Competition in State House Elections,Election Law Journal 5: 144–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Michael P. 2004. “A Comparative Analysis of Redistricting Institutions in the United States, 2001–02.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4: 371–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, John. 1998. “Power to Redistrict Is the True November Prize.” The Nation 267: November 2.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winburn, Jonathan. 2008. The Realities of Redistricting: Following the Rules and Limiting Gerrymandering in State Legislative Redistricting. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
18
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Gerrymanderers Are Coming! Legislative Redistricting Won't Affect Competition or Polarization Much, No Matter Who Does It
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Gerrymanderers Are Coming! Legislative Redistricting Won't Affect Competition or Polarization Much, No Matter Who Does It
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Gerrymanderers Are Coming! Legislative Redistricting Won't Affect Competition or Polarization Much, No Matter Who Does It
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *