Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T18:30:10.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

American Federalism, State Governments, and Public Policy: Weaving Together Loose Theoretical Threads

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Dale Krane
Dale Krane*
Affiliation:
The University of Nebraska at Omaha
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Federalism: Aftermath of the 1980s and Prospects for the 1990s
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 186 - 190
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anton, Thomas J. 1989. American Federalism and Public Policy: How the System Works. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Beam, David R., Conlan, Timothy J., and Walker, David B. 1983. “Federalism: The Challenge of Conflicting Theories and Contemporary Practice.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Finifter, Ada W.. Washington, DC: The American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha. 1992. “Up-to-Date in Kansas City: Reflections on American Federalism.” PS: Political Science & Politics 25: 671–75.Google Scholar
Dye, Thomas R. 1972. Understanding Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Dye, Thomas R. 1990. American Federalism: Competition among Governments. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
Finifter, Ada W., ed. 1983. Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, DC: The American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Judith A. and Zinnes, Dina A., eds. 1982. Missing Elements in Political Inquiry: Logic and Levels of Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Christopher and Wells, Donald T. 1990. Federalism, Power, and Political Economy: A New Theory of Federalism's Impact on American Life. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Hansen, Susan B. 1983. “Public Policy Analysis: Some Recent Developments and Current Problems.” In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, ed. Finifter, Ada W.. Washington, DC: The American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Judith A. 1982. “Introduction: Some Basic Puzzles in Political Inquiry.” In Missing Elements in Political Inquiry: Logic and Levels of Analysis, ed. Gillespie, Judith A. and Zinnes, Dina A.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Job, Brian L. 1982. “Synthesis: Problems and Prospect in Dynamic Modeling.” In Missing Elements in Political Inquiry: Logic and Levels of Analysis, ed. Gillespie, Judith A. and Zinnes, Dina A.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Krane, Dale. 1993. “State Efforts to Influence Federal Policy.” In Welfare System Reform: Coordinating Federal, State, and Local Programs, ed. Jennings, Edward T. Jr., and Zank, Neal. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Linder, Stephen H. and Peters, B. Guy. 1990. “The Design of Instruments for Public Policy.” In Policy Theory and Policy Evaluation: Concepts, Knowledge, Causes, and Norms, chap. 7, ed. Nagel, Stuart S.. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
MacManus, Susan A. 1991. “Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations: The Centralization versus Decentralization Debate Continues.” In Political Science: Looking to the Future, Vol. 4: American Institutions, ed. Crotty, William. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, John P. 1984. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78: 734–49.10.2307/1961840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, J. Donald. 1982. “Introduction: Two Views of Integrative Models.” In Missing Elements in Political Inquiry: Logic and Levels of Analysis, ed. Gillespie, Judith A. and Zinnes, Dina A.. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1991. “Rational Choice Theory and Institutional Analysis: Toward Complementarity.” American Political Science Review 85: 237–43.10.2307/1962888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressman, Jeffrey L. 1975. Federal Programs and City Politics: The Dynamics of the Aid Process in Oakland. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, David B. and Judd, Dennis R. 1989. The Development of American Public Policy: The Structure of Policy Restraint. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul A. 1991. “Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process.” PS: Political Science & Politics 24: 147–56.Google Scholar
Scheuch, Erwin K. 1969. “Social Context and Individual Behavior.” In Quantitative Ecological Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. Dogan, Mattei and Rokkan, Stein. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Treadway, Jack M. 1985. Public Policymaking in the American States. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Williams, Walter. 1980. The Implementation Perspective: A Guide for Managing Social Service Delivery Programs. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Deil S. 1988. Understanding Intergovernmental Relations, 3rd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar