Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T12:32:24.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

European Anti-Americanism and Choices for a European Defense Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2007

Leonard Ray  and
Gregory Johnston
Leonard Ray
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Gregory Johnston
Affiliation:
Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the end of World War II, a strong transatlantic partnership has been a cornerstone of Western geopolitical strategy. This does not mean that transatlantic relations have always been cordial. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was beset by periodic crises and disagreement throughout the Cold War and into the 1990s. Recent disagreements centered on the deployment of intermediate-range nuclear missiles in Europe during the 1980s, and on NATO involvement in the former Yugoslavia during the 1990s. In the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, NATO enjoyed a brief resurgence as its member nations voted unanimously to activate their mutual defense commitments under the North Atlantic Treaty (see Kaplan 2004). However, this was soon eclipsed by the subsequent dispute over U.S.-led military intervention in Iraq, the rancor rising out of which has struck such seasoned observers as Henry Kissinger and Colin Powell as being an order of magnitude worse than from past NATO crises (cited in Pond 2004, ix). Kaplan (2004, ix) describes it as a “near death” experience that threatened “to dissolve an entity that had survived over half a century.” Others argue that the alliance can and should be “saved” from a crisis that “need not be terminal to the political vitality of Atlanticism” (Hodge 2004, x). We suggest that this diplomatic crisis is doubled by a crisis in European confidence in the U.S. which may also be of unprecedented magnitude, and of some duration.

Type
FEATURES
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 85 - 91
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baas, Norbert. 2004. “ German Perceptions of the ‘War Against Terror’ in a Historical Perspective.” In NATO and the European Union: New World, New Europe, New Threats, ed. Hall Gardner. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 181–97.Google Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford, and Anand Singh. 2004. “A Decision Theoretic Model of Public Opinion: Guns, Butter, and European Common Defense.” American Journal of Political Science 48: 218–31.Google Scholar
Chicago Council on Foreign Relations. 2002. Worldviews 2002: European Public Opinion & Foreign Policy. www.worldviews.org/detailreports/europeanreport.pdf. Accessed August 11, 2004.Google Scholar
Eichenberg, Richard C. 1989. Public Opinion and National Security in Western Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Eichenberg, Richard C. 2003. “Having it Both Ways: European Defense Integration and the Commitment to NATO.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67 (4): 627–60.Google Scholar
Everts, Philip. 1995. “ NATO, the European Community, and the United Nations.” In Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance, eds. Oskar Niedermayer and Richard Sinnott. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gallup, George. 1978. The International Gallup Polls: Public Opinion 1978. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
Gordon, Philip, and Jeremy Shapiro. 2004. Allies at War: America, Europe, and the Crisis over Iraq. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Hastings, Elizabeth, and Philip Hastings, eds. 1992. Index to International Public Opinion, 1991–1992. London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Hastings, Elizabeth, and Philip Hastings 1996. Index to International Public Opinion, 1995–1996. London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Kim Quaile, and Patricia A. Hurley. 1999. “Dyadic Representation Reappraised.” American Journal of Political Science 45: 109–37.Google Scholar
Hodge, Carl. 2004. Atlanticism for a New Century: The Rise, Triumph and Decline of NATO. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet. 2003. “Europe Divided? Elite vs. Public Opinion on European Integration.” European Union Politics 4 (3): 281–304.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Lawrence S. 2004. NATO Divided, NATO United: The Evolution of an Alliance. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 1998. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.Google Scholar
Merritt, Richard, and Donald Puchala. 1968. Western European Perspectives on International Affairs, Public Opinion, and Evaluations. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Pew Center for the People, and the Press. 2004. A Year After Iraq War: Mistrust of America in Europe Ever Higher, Muslim Anger Persists. http://people-press.org/reports/pdf/206.pdf. Accessed August 11, 2004.Google Scholar
Pew Center for the People, and the Press. 2006. America's Image Slips, but Allies Share U.S. Concerns over Iran, Ham as. http://pewglobal.org/reports/pdf/252.pdf. Accessed November 17, 2006.Google Scholar
PIPA. 2005. “In 18 of 21 Countries Polled, Most See Bush's Reelection Negative for World Security.” University of Maryland: Program on International Policy Attitudes. www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/Views_US/BushReelect_Jan05/BushReelect_Jan05_rpt.pdf. Accessed June 26, 2006.Google Scholar
Pond, Elizabeth. 2004. Friendly Fire: The Near-death of the Transatlantic Alliance. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Rees, G. Wyn. 2000. “ Common Foreign and Security Policy and Defense: A Lost Opportunity?” In Reforming the European Union—from Maastricht to Amsterdam, eds. Perter Lynch, Nanette Neuwahl, and G. Wyn Rees. Harrom, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven, and Douglas Wertman. 1992. “Redefining U.S.-West European Relations in the 1990s: West European Public Opinion in the Post Cold War Era.” PS: Political Science and Politics 25 (2): 188–95.Google Scholar
Sobel, Richard. 2001. The Impact of Public Opinion on U.S. Foreign Policy since Vietnam: Constraining the Colossus. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 1999. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 1.2.1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, June 1. http://gking.harvard.edu/.Google Scholar
United States Information Agency. 1970. R-24-70 America's International Standing in West European Opinion at the End of 1969. Washington, D.C.: USIA Office of Research.Google Scholar
United States Information Agency. 1976. R-20-76 European Views of the United States in Mid-1976. Washington, D.C.: USIA Office of Research.Google Scholar
United States Information Agency. 1982. R-4-82 Trends in U.S. Standing in West European Public Opinion. Washington, D.C.: USIA Office of Research.Google Scholar
Wiessala, Georg. 2000. “ The Global Reach of the European Union.” In New Europe in Transition, eds. Peter J. Anderson, Georg Wiessala, and Christopher Williams. London: Continuum.Google Scholar