Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access

When Tenure Protects the Incompetent: Results from a Survey of Department Chairs

  • John M. Rothgeb (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096513001558
  • Published online: 29 December 2013
Abstract
Abstract

This research uses data from a national survey of political science department chairs to explore when tenure protects incompetent faculty. The characteristics of the responding institutions and the procedures and standards they use when evaluating tenure applications were analyzed to determine how they related to the protection of the incompetent. The results reveal that tenure is most likely to shield incompetent faculty when collegiality plays a role in tenure decisions and when departments focus on the quantity of articles an applicant publishes. The findings also show that when departments demand that candidates publish in prestigious journals and when higher authorities at the institution have reversed positive departmental tenure recommendations, the probability that the incompetent are protected declines.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      When Tenure Protects the Incompetent: Results from a Survey of Department Chairs
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      When Tenure Protects the Incompetent: Results from a Survey of Department Chairs
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      When Tenure Protects the Incompetent: Results from a Survey of Department Chairs
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Bob Algozzine , John Beattie, Marty Bray, Claudia Flowers, John Gretes, Lisa Howley, Ganesh Mohanty, and Fred Spooner. 2004. “Student Evaluation of College Teaching: A Practice in Search of Principles.” College Teaching 52: 134–41.

Mary Ellen Benedict . 1999. “The Union Effect on the Earning Distribution in Higher Education in Ohio.” The American Economist 43 (Spring): 5770.

William L. Boyd 2007. “The Politics of Privatization in American Education.” Educational Policy 21 (1): 714.

Ralph S. Brown Jr., and Jordan E. Kurland. 1990. “Academic Tenure and Academic Freedom.” Law and Contemporary Problems 53 (Summer): 325–55.

David W. Hedrick , Steven E. Henson, John M. Krieg, and Charles S. Wassell Jr. 2011. “Is There Really a Faculty Union Salary Premium?Industrial and Labor Relations Review 64 (April): 558–75.

James Jaccard . 2001. Interaction Effects in Logistic Regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Amal Kawar . 1983. “Criteria for Tenure and Promotion at Public Universities and Colleges in the West.” PS: Political Science and Politics 16 (Summer): 541–43.

W. Hal Knight , and Michael C. Holen. 1985. “Leadership and the Perceived Effectiveness of Department Chairpersons.” Journal of Higher Education 56 (November–December): 677–90.

Gary F. Kohut , Charles Burnap, and Maria G. Yon. 2007. “Peer Observation of Teaching: Perceptions Of the Observer and the Observed.” College Teaching 55: 1925.

David W. Leslie 1973. “The Status of the Department Chairmanship in University Organization.” AAUP Bulletin 59 (December): 419–26.

Lionel S. Lewis 1980. “Academic Tenure: Its Recipients and Its Effects.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 448 (March): 86101.

Fritz Machlup . 1964. “In Defense of Academic Tenure.” AAUP Bulletin 50 (June): 112–24.

Ralph D. Mawdsley 1999. “Collegiality as a Factor in Tenure Decisions.” Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 13: 167–77.

Scott Menard . 2002. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Fred C. Pampel 2000. Logistic Regression: A Primer. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage Publications.

Betsy Park , and Robert Riggs. 1993. “Tenure and Promotion: A Study of Practices by Institutional Type.” Journal of Academic Librarianship 19 (2): 7277.

Lauren M. Rhim 2007. “The Politics of Privatization Practice.” Educational Policy 21 (1): 245–72.

William Van Alstyne . 1971. “Tenure: A Summary, Explanation, and ‘Defense’.” AAUP Bulletin 57 (Autumn): 328–33.

Christine M. Wickens 2008. “The Organizational Impact of University Labor Unions.” Higher Education 56 (January): 545–64.

Melinda Wood , and Chrstine Des Jarlais. 2006. “When Post-Tenure Review Policy and Practice Diverge: Making the Case for Congruence.” The Journal of Higher Education 77 (July/August): 561–88.

Maria Yon , Charles Burnap, and Gary Kohut. 2002. “Evidence of Effective Teaching: Perceptions of Peer Reviews.” College Teaching 50: 104–10.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×