Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Care Programme Approach: time for frank talking

  • Tom Burns (a1) and Judy Leibowitz (a1)
Extract

The Care Programme Approach (CPA) was introduced as a cornerstone of the Government's mental health policy in 1992 (Kingdon, 1994). It was meant to clarify the complex issues surrounding the coordination of care for the severely mentally ill and to promote interprofessional communication and effective targeting of resources by community mental health teams (CMHTs). The Ritchie report into the care of Christopher Clunis (Ritchie, 1994) underlined the need for clarity about who has overall responsibility for coordination and review of the progress of care – the key worker. The report makes a compelling case for a clearly documented care plan with identified problems, therapeutic goals and an unambiguous statement of who is responsible for what and when. How, then, could this virtuous proposal generate conflict and bad feeling? And why is there relatively little debate about it in the professional press?

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Care Programme Approach: time for frank talking
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Care Programme Approach: time for frank talking
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Care Programme Approach: time for frank talking
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Hide All
Burns, B. J. & Santos, A. B. (1995) Assertive community treatment: an update of randomized trials. Psychiatric Services, 46, 669675.
Burns, T. (1990) Community ward rounds. Health Trends, 22, 6263.
Curtis, J. L., Millman, E. J., Struening, E., et al (1992) Effect of case management on rehospitalisation and utilisation of ambulatory care services. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 43, 895899.
Foster, H. D., Falkowski, W. & Rollings, J. (1991) A survey of patients' attitudes towards inpatient psychiatric ward rounds. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 37, 135140.
Franklin, J. L., Solovitz, B., Mason, M., et al (1994) An evaluation of case management. American Journal of Public Health, 77, 674678.
Griffiths, R. (1988) Community Care: Agenda for Action. London: HMSO.
Hoult, J., Reynolds, I., Charbonneau-Powis, M., et al (1983) Psychiatric hospital versus community treatment: the results of a randomised trial. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 17, 160167.
Intagliata, J. (1982) Improving the quality of community care for the chronically mentally disabled: the role of case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 8, 655674.
Kingdon, D. (1994) Care Programme Approach: Recent Government policy and legislation. Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 18, 6870.
Kosky, N. & Burns, T. (1995) Patient access to psychiatric records: experience in an in-patient unit. Psychiatric Bulletin, 19, 8790.
Lancet (1996) Care-management: a disastrous mistake. Editorial. Lancet, 345, 399401.
Marshall, M. (1995) Case management: a dubious practice. Under evaluated and ineffective, but now government policy. British Medical Journal, 312, 523524.
Marshall, M., Lockwood, A. & Gath, D. (1995) Social services case-management for long-term mental disorders: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 345, 409412.
McLean, E. & Leibowitz, J. (1990) A community mental health team to serve revolving door patients: the Doddington Edward Wilson PEW) Mental Health Team 1984–1988. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 36, 172182.
Muijen, M., Marks, I. M., Connolly, J., et al (1992) The Daily Living Programme: preliminary comparison of community versus hospital-based treatment for the seriously mentally ill facing emergency admission. British Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 379384.
Muijen, M., Cooney, M., Strathdee, G., et al (1994) Community psychiatric nurse teams: intensive support versus generic care. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 211217.
Ritchie, H. G. (1994) The Christopher Clunis Inquiry. London: HMSO.
Solomon, P. (1992) The efficacy of case management services for severely mentally disabled clients. Community Mental Health Journal, 28, 163180.
Stein, L. I. & Test, M. A. (1980) Alternative to mental hospital treatment. (1) Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 392397.
Tyrer, P., Morgan, J., Van Horn, E., et al (1995) A randomised controlled study of close monitoring of vulnerable patients. Lancet, 345, 756759.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Bulletin
  • ISSN: 0955-6036
  • EISSN: 1472-1473
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-bulletin
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 16th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

The Care Programme Approach: time for frank talking

  • Tom Burns (a1) and Judy Leibowitz (a1)
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *