Skip to main content
×
×
Home

MRCPsych examinations: cumulative results 1997–2002

  • Femi Oyebode (a1) and Elizabeth Furlong (a2)
Abstract
Aims and Method

The aim of this study was to investigate the pattern of performance of candidates in the MRCPsych examinations in the period 1997–2002 inclusive. During this period 6306 candidates sat the MRCPsych part I and 4536 sat the MRCPsych part II.

Results

The overall pass rates for MRCPsych part I was 44.7% and 48.9% for MRCPsych part II. The majority of those who passed either part of the examinations did so on their first attempt; females performed better than males and graduates of UK and Republic of Ireland medical schools performed better than foreign graduates in all component parts of the examinations.

Clinical Implications

The pattern of results suggests that clinical tutors and course organisers need to pay special care to the training needs of trainees who are foreign medical graduates.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      MRCPsych examinations: cumulative results 1997–2002
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      MRCPsych examinations: cumulative results 1997–2002
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      MRCPsych examinations: cumulative results 1997–2002
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Hide All
Ayres, P., Rigby, A. S. & Williams, R. (1996) Part 1 of Membership of the Faculty of Public Health Medicine (MFPHM). Trends over time and factors associated with success in recent years. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 18, 390395.
Benson, J. A., Meskauskas, J. A. & Grosso, L. J. (1981) Performance of US citizen–foreign medical graduates on certifying examinations in internal medicine. American Journal of Medicine, 71, 270273.
Blacket, R. B. (1990) Foreign medical graduates. The experience of the Australian Medical Examining Council and the Australian Medical Council, 1978–1989: implications for medical immigration and the medical workforce. Medical Journal of Australia, 153, 125132.
Holsgrove, G. & Elzubeir, M. (1998) Imprecise terms in UK multiple-choice questions: what examiners think they mean. Medical Education, 32, 343350.
Krueger, P. M. (1998) Do women medical students outperform men in obstetrics and gynaecology? Academic Medicine, 73, 101102.
Lowy, F. H. & Dongier, M. (1979) The Canadian Certification Examination in Psychiatry. II. Who passes and who fails. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, 24, 282292.
McKendry, R. J. & Dale, P. (1995) Does the number of trainees in a postgraduate training programme influence the pass rates on certifying examinations? Clinical Investigative Medicine, 18, 7379.
McKendry, R. J., Busing, N., Dauphinee, D.W., et al (2000) Does the site of postgraduate family medicine training predict performance on summative examinations? A comparison of urban and remote programmes. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 163, 708711.
Mick, S. S. & Mou, T.W. (1991) The Foreign Medical Graduate Examination in the Medical Sciences (FMGEMS). An analysis of pass rates of the July 1984 through July 1987 examinations. Medical Care, 29, 229242.
Meskauskas, J. A., Benson, J. A. & Hopkins, E. (1977) Performance of graduates of foreign medical schools on the examinations of the American Board of Internal Medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 297, 808810.
Norcini, J. J., Shea, J. A., Webster, G. D. et al (1986) Predictors of the performance of foreign medical graduates on the 1982 certifying examination in internal medicine. Journal of American Medical Association, 256, 33673370.
Norcini, J., Anderson, M. B. & McKinley, D.W. (2006) The medical education of US citizens who train abroad. Surgery, 140, 338346.
Quick, S. K. & Robinowitz, C. B. (1981) Examination success and opinions on American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology certification. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138, 340344.
Roberts, C., Sarangi, S., Southgate, L. et al (2000) Oral examinations – equal opportunities, ethnicity, and fairness in the MRCGP. BMJ, 320, 370375.
Schenker, J. G. (1993) Results of medical licensing examinations: 1988–1991. Harefuah, 124, 638640 (in Hebrew).
Tyrer, S. P., Leung, W.-C., Smalls, J. et al (2002) The relationship between medical school of training, age, gender and success in the MRCPsych examinations. Psychiatric Bulletin, 26, 257263.
Wakeford, R., Farooqi, A., Rashid, A., et al (1992) Does the MRCGP discriminate against Asian doctors? BMJ, 305, 9294.
Weinberg, E. & Bell, A. I. (1978) Performance of United States citizens with foreign medical education on standardised medical examinations. New England Journal of Medicine, 299, 858862.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Bulletin
  • ISSN: 0955-6036
  • EISSN: 1472-1473
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-bulletin
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 1 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 109 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 17th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

MRCPsych examinations: cumulative results 1997–2002

  • Femi Oyebode (a1) and Elizabeth Furlong (a2)
Submit a response

eLetters

Interesting paper

AK Al-Sheikhli, Consultant Psychiatrist
16 March 2007

Dear Editor-I read Oyebode and Furlong's article with interest,It will be interesting to compare his results with previous results,like for e.g with the results of early eighties.

Regards

A.K.Al-Sheikhli

Conflict of interest: None Declared

Write a reply

College to provide proper feedback

Dr Ashish Rana, SHO CAMHS, Horsham, West Sussex
26 February 2007

The article on MRCPsych examinations:cumulative results by Femi Oyebode & Elizabeth Furlong interested me as I will be writing my first MRCPych exam in two weeks time as a foreign medical graduate.

The study has taken into consideration the exam pattern which is not prevailing since 2003 so drawing conclusions out of it will not be presenting up to date picture. It discusses mostly on the different passing rates of UK & Irish graduates compared to foreign medical graduates but has overlooked many other issues projected by the results and is unable to give any recommendation to the college about the outcome.

One of the major issue overlooked is the reason behind the differencebetween the passing rates of females and males which is 51.9% and 39.8% respectively.They must have compared results with evidences showing betterpassing rates of females.They were unable to give reason for significant difference between the passing rates of graduates of Indian subcontinent compared with graduates from Indian borders.

I do agree with there conclusions that College examinations are fair to all candidates and that the outcome for candidates is a true reflectionof knowledge and skills & it is equally important that foreign medicalgraduates have similar opportunities to UK graduates in order to gain adequate knowledge and clinical experience so as to be able to adequately prepare for the College examinations but keeping in view the fact that majority of examinees presently are foreign medical graduates, college hasto improve the standard of their feedback to help the failed candidate to better understand the skills needed to improve before taking the next attempt.

I would like someone to assess the passing rates in the present pattern as my belief is that there might not be a significant difference in passing the theory exams of both Part 1 & 2 between UK and Indian subcontinent graduates.
... More

Conflict of interest: None Declared

Write a reply

Low pass rate for asian doctors

Ruchi Thakur, Staff Grade ,MRCPsych
26 February 2007

It is a very bold step by the Royal College to publish the data of the examinations and I would like to thank them for making this data available to all of us.

There are various reasons specified by the authors namely

Poor communication,Poor language comprehension,Less clinical experience,Smaller training programmes,Less knowledge of Behavioural Science

It’s very sad to see that doctors of Asian origin have such a small pass rate while they constitute the maximum strength of doctors in the NHS.I feel instead of blaming the doctors of Asian origin for being unaware ofBritish culture it’s also very important that the examiners are made culturally aware of the doctors who are working in the NHS.

It’s not necessary that the adjustment has to come from the asian doctors because they are are new to this country. The adjustment has to come from both sides. Both parties have to learn to understand each others culture. It’s important that the patients in NHS are aware that they are unlikely to get a doctor of British origin every time they visit a clinic.Hence they should learn to communicate their problems effectively and make the doctor understand what they are trying to say.I am sure most of the patients are aware of this and have adjusted to the asian doctors.

Similarly I feel the examiners cannot expect the doctors of Asian origin to suddenly learn a new style of communicating and be penalised forsame. Learning about a new culture is a lifelong process and cannot be picked up in a year or two.

Poor language comprehension should not be a reason to fail a candidate because we are not aiming to differentiate someone with good English or poor English. Our aim is to differentiate a knowledgeable person from a person with substandard knowledge. We all have already passed our IELTS so testing English comprehension again is not advisable. Hence the Royal College if feels that candidates are finding the comprehension of written paper a bit difficult they could reframe the same question in simple language.

Behavioural Science may be a factor for poor performance in Part I but in Part II the candidates have enough experience in psychiatry to learn this subject. I personally do not feel this is a major factor for candidates to fail the examination.

It’s interesting to note that the authors have not considered bias ofthe examiners towards foreign graduates as a factor for failing them. Thisis important as most foreign graduates feel this is the main reason for them failing.To make the examination a fair process its important Royal College makes efforts to reduce this bias if present.
... More

Conflict of interest: None Declared

Write a reply

Pass rate in MRCPsych

Sudip Sikdar, consultant psychiatrist, college examiner
16 February 2007

I read Oyebode and Furlong's article with particular interest especially as an overseas doctor as well as a college examiner.Other than the possible reasons for a poorer pass rate for overseas doctors that have already been elucidated in the article, there are some other possible reasons which may account for this disparity.Over the last few years, I have found that the quality of overseas trainees has deteriorated as many of them were forced to take up psychiatry as a last resort to train in the UK when they wanted to train in medicine or surgery as 1st choice (subjects that are perceived to have "value"/ make one a "proper doctor" in their home countries). This perception unfortunately is still prevalent in the Indian sub-continent and is reflected in undergraduate training curriculum and perhaps makes graduate doctors less "psychologically minded" (we all know that psychiatry is a combination of science and art).Visa restrictions also force doctors to take the exams as quickly as possible when many of them are neither theoretically or practically competent.Unfortunately, many unsuccessful candidates fail to understand the reasonsfor failing the exam and feel victimised as overseas doctors. The feedbacksystem to unsuccessful candidates has improved over the years but perhaps could be more elaborate to help these doctors. ... More

Conflict of interest: None Declared

Write a reply

Passing examinations is an art.

Sunanda Ghosh, SHO, Newham Centre for Mental Health
16 February 2007

The paper on MRCPsych examinations by Oyebode and Furlong interested me as a foreign graduate who cleared both examinations on the first attempt.

The author's statement that 'the type and quality of undergraduate medical education can have an effect on postgraduate education and performance' made me try and imagine the pass rates for candidates graduating from UK, were they to appear for a similar examination in the Indian subcontinent. Passing exams in any country needs an understanding of the system, utilizing available resources, hard work, and practise.

Improving competence means continuing professional and personal development. I am yet to meet a candidate who failed the membership examsand blamed it on his or her background. Candidates, irrespective of their origin and background should pool their resources. With the widespread useof the internet, working in small groups should not be allowed to be a hinderance. Some of my peers would state that passing examinations is an art. While candidates may not hope to pass without adequate knowlege, theyoften need a different set of skills to perform well in the exams. These would not necessarily be the same as clinical skills. I suggest local tutors and candidates should allow for development of such skills.
... More

Conflict of interest: None Declared

Write a reply

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *