Skip to main content
×
×
Home

What psychiatrists think about Part III of the Mental Health Act 1983

  • Alec Buchanan and John Gunn (a1)
Abstract
Aims and method

The government has proposed a ‘root and branch’ review of the Mental Health Act 1983 to be conducted by the end of 1999. The aim of the study was to establish the views of general and forensic psychiatrists as to the adequacy of present legislative provision for England and Wales. The study was carried out by postal survey.

Results

The response rates were 82%, for forensic psychiatrists and 67%, for general psychiatrists. Most respondents considered most of present provision satisfactory. Areas considered in need of amendment were: the term ‘psychopathic disorder’; the requirement for an offence punishable by imprisonment before a hospital order can be made, provision for remands to hospital and the loss of clinical independence consequent upon the making of a restriction order.

Clinical implications

Forensic psychiatrists seem more willing than general psychiatrists to see their clinical discretion limited by the courts. Most of the suggestions were for changes to individual aspects of the present legislation rather than radical reform.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      What psychiatrists think about Part III of the Mental Health Act 1983
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      What psychiatrists think about Part III of the Mental Health Act 1983
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      What psychiatrists think about Part III of the Mental Health Act 1983
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
Correspondence
References
Hide All
Akinkunmi, A. & Murray, K. (1997) Inadequacies in the Mental Health Act, 1983 in relation to mentally disordered remand prisoners. Medicine, Science and the Law, 37, 53 57.
Chiswick, D. (1992) Compulsory treatment of patients with psychopathic disorder: an abnormally aggressive or seriously irresponsible exercise: Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 2, 106 113.
Cope, R. (1993) A survey of forensic psychiatrists' views on psychopathic disorder. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 4, 215 235.
Department of Health and Social Security & Home Office (1992) Review of Health and Social Services for Mentally Disordered Offenders and Others Requiring Similar Services. The Reed Report. London: HMSO.
Exworthy, T., Parrott, J. & Bridges, P. (1992) Section 48: an underused provision? Psychiatric Bulletin, 16, 97 98.
Exworthy, T. & Glen, C. (1992) A case for change: Section 35, Mental Health Act 1983. Justice of the Peace, 156, 663 664.
Grounds, A. T. (1987) Detention of ‘psychopathic disorder’ patients in special hospital: critical issues. British Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 474 478.
Kon, Y. & Bouras, N. (1996) The use of the Mental Health Act in learning disabilities. Psychiatric Bulletin, 20, 596 598.
Mawson, D. (1983) ‘Psychopaths’ in Special Hospitals. Bulletin of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, 7, 178 181.
Mental Health Act Commission (1987) Second Biennial Report 1985–1987. London: HMSO.
Mental Health Act Commission (1993) Fifth Biennial Report. 1991–1993. London: HMSO.
Robertson, G., Dell, S., James, K., et al (1994) Psychotic men remanded in custody to Brixton prison. British Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 55 61.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Bulletin
  • ISSN: 0955-6036
  • EISSN: 1472-1473
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-bulletin
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 4 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 13 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 16th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

What psychiatrists think about Part III of the Mental Health Act 1983

  • Alec Buchanan and John Gunn (a1)
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *