Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Consumption of sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks and risk of obesity-related cancers

  • Allison M Hodge (a1) (a2), Julie K Bassett (a1), Roger L Milne (a1) (a2), Dallas R English (a1) (a2) and Graham G Giles (a1) (a2)...
Abstract
Objective

To test the hypothesis that more frequent consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks would be associated with increased risk of obesity-related cancers. Associations for artificially sweetened soft drinks were assessed for comparison.

Design

Prospective cohort study with cancers identified by linkage to cancer registries. At baseline, participants completed a 121-item FFQ including separate questions about the number of times in the past year they had consumed sugar-sweetened or artificially sweetened soft drinks. Anthropometric measurements, including waist circumference, were taken and questions about smoking, leisure-time physical activity and intake of alcoholic beverages were completed.

Setting

The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (MCCS) is a prospective cohort study which recruited 41 514 men and women aged 40–69 years between 1990 and 1994. A second wave of data collection occurred in 2003–2007.

Subjects

Data for 35 593 participants who developed 3283 incident obesity-related cancers were included in the main analysis.

Results

Increasing frequency of consumption of both sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened soft drinks was associated with greater waist circumference at baseline. For sugar-sweetened soft drinks, the hazard ratio (HR) for obesity-related cancers increased as frequency of consumption increased (HR for consumption >1/d v. <1/month=1·18; 95 % CI 0·97, 1·45; P-trend=0·007). For artificially sweetened soft drinks, the HR for obesity-related cancers was not associated with consumption (HR for consumption >1/d v. <1/month=1·00; 95 % CI 0·79, 1·27; P-trend=0·61).

Conclusions

Our results add to the justification to minimise intake of sugar-sweetened soft drinks.

Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Email allison.hodge@cancervic.org.au
References
Hide All
1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2014) Australian Health Survey: Nutrition First Results-Foods and Nutrients, 201112 . Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
2. Malik, VS, Pan, A, Willett, WC & Hu, FB (2013) Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 98, 10841102.
3. Massougbodji, J, Le Bodo, Y, Fratu, R et al. (2014) Reviews examining sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight: correlates of their quality and conclusions. Am J Clin Nutr 99, 10961104.
4. Veerman, JL, Sacks, G, Antonopoulos, N et al. (2016) The impact of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages on health and health care costs: a modelling study. PLoS One 11, e0151460.
5. Boyle, P, Koechlin, A & Autier, P (2014) Sweetened carbonated beverage consumption and cancer risk: meta-analysis and review. Eur J Cancer Prev 23, 481490.
6. World Cancer Research Fund International (2016) Obesity, physical activity and cancer, http://www.wcrf.org/sites/default/files/Obesity-physical-activity-and-cancer-infographic.pdf (accessed September 2017).
7. International Agency for Research on Cancer (2013) 4-Methylimidazole. In IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. vol. 101: Some Chemicals Present in Industrial and Consumer Products, Food and Drinking-water, pp. 447–459. Lyon: IARC.
8. Smith, TJ, Wolfson, JA, Jiao, D et al. (2015) Caramel color in soft drinks and exposure to 4-methylimidazole: a quantitative risk assessment. PLoS One 10, e0118138.
9. Milne, R, Fletcher, A, MacInnis, R et al. (2017) Cohort Profile: the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (Health 2020). Int J Epidemiol (Epublication ahead of print version).
10. Hodge, AM, Bassett, JK, Shivappa, N et al. (2016) Dietary inflammatory index, Mediterranean diet score, and lung cancer: a prospective study. Cancer Causes Control 27, 907917.
11. MacInnis, RJ, English, DR, Hopper, JL et al. (2004) Body size and composition and colon cancer risk in men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13, 553559.
12. Rothman, K, Greenland, S & Lash, T (editors) (2008) Modern Epidemiology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
13. Giles, GG & English, DR (2002) The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. IARC Sci Publ 156, 6970.
14. Fowler, SPG (2016) Low-calorie sweetener use and energy balance: results from experimental studies in animals, and large-scale prospective studies in humans. Physiol Behav 164, 517523.
15. Schernhammer, ES, Bertrand, KA, Birmann, BM et al. (2012) Consumption of artificial sweetener- and sugar-containing soda and risk of lymphoma and leukemia in men and women. Am J Clin Nutr 96, 14191428.
16. Ma, J, McKeown, NM, Hwang, SJ et al. (2016) Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption is associated with change of visceral adipose tissue over 6 years of follow-up. Circulation 133, 370377.
17. Doyle, SL, Donohoe, CL, Lysaght, J et al. (2012) Visceral obesity, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance and cancer. Proc Nutr Soc 71, 181189.
18. World Cancer Research Fund & American Institute for Cancer Research (2007) Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: A Global Perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research.
19. Wang, Z, Uchida, K, Ohnaka, K et al. (2014) Sugars, sucrose and colorectal cancer risk: the Fukuoka colorectal cancer study. Scand J Gastroenterol 49, 581588.
20. Qin, B, Moorman, PG, Alberg, AJ et al. (2016) Dietary carbohydrate intake, glycaemic load, glycaemic index and ovarian cancer risk in African-American women. Br J Nutr 115, 694702.
21. Lei, L, Rangan, A, Flood, VM et al. (2016) Dietary intake and food sources of added sugar in the Australian population. Br J Nutr 115, 868877.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 177
Total number of PDF views: 633 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 7711 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st February 2018 - 19th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.