Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Cost of inaction on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption: implications for obesity in South Africa

  • Aviva Tugendhaft (a1), Mercy Manyema (a1), Lennert J Veerman (a2), Lumbwe Chola (a1), Demetre Labadarios (a3) and Karen J Hofman (a1)...
Abstract
Abstract Objective

To estimate the effect of increased sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption on future adult obesity prevalence in South Africa in the absence of preventive measures.

Design

A model was constructed to simulate the effect of a 2·4 % annual increase in SSB consumption on obesity prevalence. The model computed the change in energy intake assuming a compounding increase in SSB consumption. The population distribution of BMI by age and sex was modelled by fitting measured data from the 2012 South African National Income Dynamics Survey to the log-normal distribution and shifting the mean values.

Setting

Over the past decade the prevalence of obesity and related non-communicable diseases has increased in South Africa, as have the sales and availability of SSB. Soft drink sales in South Africa are projected to grow between 2012 and 2017 at an annual compounded growth rate of 2·4 % in the absence of preventive measures to curb consumption.

Results

A 2·4 % annual growth in SSB sales alongside population growth and ageing will result in an additional 1 287 000 obese adults in South Africa by 2017, 22 % of which will be due to increased SSB consumption.

Conclusions

In order to meet the South African target of reducing the number of people who are obese and/or overweight by 10 % by 2020, the country cannot afford to delay implementing effective population-wide interventions. In the face of plans to increase growth of SSB, the country will soon face even greater challenges in overcoming obesity and related non-communicable diseases.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Cost of inaction on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption: implications for obesity in South Africa
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Cost of inaction on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption: implications for obesity in South Africa
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Cost of inaction on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption: implications for obesity in South Africa
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Email Karen.Hofman@wits.ac.za
References
Hide All
1. Department of Health, Medical Research Council & OrcMacro (2007) South Africa Demographic and Health Survey 2003. Pretoria: Department of Health.
2. Shisana O, Labadarios D, Rehle T et al. (2013) South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (SANHANES-1). Cape Town: HSRC Press.
3. Igumbor EU, Sanders D, Puoane TR et al. (2012) ‘Big food’, the consumer food environment, health, and the policy response in South Africa. PLoS Med 9, e1001253.
4. Malaza A, Mossong J, Barnighausen T et al. (2012) Hypertension and obesity in adults living in a high HIV prevalence rural area in South Africa. PLoS One 7, e47761.
5. Joubert J, Norman R, Bradshaw D et al. (2007) Estimating the burden of disease attributable to excess body weight in South Africa in 2000. S Afr Med J 97, 683690.
6. National Department of Health (2013) Strategic Plan for the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases 2013–17. Pretoria: NDOH.
7. Vartanian LR, Schwartz MB & Brownell KD (2007) Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health 97, 667675.
8. Sturm R, An R, Maroba J et al. (2013) The effects of obesity, smoking, and excessive alcohol intake on healthcare expenditure in a comprehensive medical scheme. S Afr Med J 103, 840844.
9. Tugendhaft A & Hofman K (2014) Empowering healthy food and beverage choices in the workplace. Occup Health S Afr 22, 68.
10. Hu FB & Malik VS (2010) Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: epidemiologic evidence. Physiol Behav 100, 4754.
11. Woodward-Lopez G, Kao J & Ritchie L (2011) To what extent have sweetened beverages contributed to the obesity epidemic? Public Health Nutr 14, 499509.
12. Te Morenga L, Mallard S & Mann J (2013) Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ 346, e7492.
13. Babey SH, Jones M, Yu H et al. (2009) Bubbling over: soda consumption and its link to obesity in California. Policy Brief UCLA Cent Health Policy Res issue PB2009-05, 18.
14. Malik VS & Hu FB (2012) Sweeteners and risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes: the role of sugar-sweetened beverages. Curr Diab Rep 12, 195203.
15. Finmark Trust & FinScope SA (2013) FinScope SA 2013 Consumer Survey. http://www.finmark.org.za/wp-content/uploads/pubs/Pres_FSSA_2013_excluding-videos2.pdf (accessed August 2014).
16. Freudenberg N (2014) Lethal but Legal: Corporations, Consumption, and Protecting Public Health. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Times Media Division Ad Room (2013) Sunday Times top brands awards 2013. http://www.tmadroom.co.za/surveys-1/i-am-brand (accessed July 2014).
18. Adami N, Ustas J, Penhale I et al. (2012) SABMiller plc Quarterly Divisional Seminar Series South Africa. London: SABMIller plc.
19. The Coca-Cola Company (2013) Per capita consumption of company beverage products. http://www.coca-colacompany.com/annual-review/2012/pdf/2012-per-capita-consumption.pdf (accessed November 2013).
20. Mackay A & Blyth D (2014) Brands that have made it in the new South Africa. http://www.ywood.co.za/thinking/articles/brands-that-have-made-it-in-the-new-south-africa.aspx (accessed May 2014).
21. United Nations (2011) Non-communicable diseases deemed development challenge of ‘epidemic proportions’ in political declaration adopted during landmark General Assembly Summit. http://www.un.org/press/en/2011/ga11138.doc.htm (accessed November 2014).
22. Dodds C (2013) Minister of Health goes sour on sugar. In The Saturday Star. South Africa: Independent News and Media.
23. European Public Health Alliance (2012) Food taxation in Europe: evolution of the legislation. http://www.epha.org/4814 (accessed March 2015).
24. Obesity Policy Coalition (2015) Aussies give green light on tax for sugar-filled drinks to curb obesity epidemic. http://www.opc.org.au/latestnews/mediareleases/pages/aussies-give-green-light-on-tax-for-sugar-filled-drinks.aspx-.VYsAMROqqko (accessed June 2015).
25. Cheney C (2011) Battling the couch potatoes: Hungary introduces ‘fat tax’. http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/battling-the-couch-potatoes-hungary-introduces-fat-tax-a-783862.html (accessed June 2014).
26. Spiegel Online International (2011) French ‘cola tax’ approved: Paris vows to fight deficit and obesity. http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/french-cola-tax-approved-paris-vows-to-fight-deficit-and-obesity-a-806194.html (accessed May 2014).
27. UNESDA (2010) Why Discriminatory Taxes Don’t Work. Brussels: UNESDA.
28. Frizell S (2014) Nation’s first soda tax passed in California city. http://time.com/3558281/soda-tax-berkeley/ (accessed December 2014).
29. Mexican National Institute of Public Health (2014) Preliminary results of a one peso tax on sugar sweetened beverages in Mexico. http://www.insp.mx/epppo/blog/preliminares-bebidas-azucaradas.html (accessed June 2015).
30. Manyema M, Veerman L, Chola L et al. (2014) The potential impact of a 20% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages on obesity in South African adults: a mathematical model. PLoS One 9, e105287.
31. Euromonitor International (2013) Soft Drinks in South Africa: Industry Overview. London: Euromonitor International.
32. Swinburn BA, Sacks G, Lo SK et al. (2009) Estimating the changes in energy flux that characterize the rise in obesity prevalence. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 17231728.
33. Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit (2013) National Income Dynamics Study 2012, Wave 3. Cape Town: DataFirst.
34. Leibbtandt M, Woolard I & de Villiers L (2009) Methodology: Report on NIDS Wave 1. NIDS Technical Paper no. 1. Cape Town: SALDRU.
35. Brown M, Daniels RC, De Villiers L et al., (editors) (2012) National Income Dynamics Study. Wave 2 User Manual – Updated. Cape Town: SALDRU.
36. De Villiers L, Brown M, Woolard I et al., (editors) (2013) National Income Dynamics Study. Wave 3 User Manual. Cape Town: SALDRU.
37. Statistics South Africa (2014) Quarterly Labour Force Survey, Quarter 1, 2014: Appendix 1, no. P0211. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.
38. Wolmarans P, Danster N, Dalton A et al. (2010) Condensed Food Composition Tables for South Africa. South Africa: South African Food Data System, South Africa Medical Research Council.
39. Rose G & Day S (1990) The population mean predicts the number of deviant individuals. BMJ 301, 10311034.
40. Cabrera Escobar MA, Veerman J, Tollman SM et al. (213) Evidence that a tax on sugar sweetened beverages reduces the obesity rate: a meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 13, 1072.
41. Basu S, Vellakkal S, Agrawal S et al. (2014) Averting obesity and type 2 diabetes in India through sugar-sweetened beverage taxation: an economic–epidemiologic modeling study. PLoS Med 11, e1001582.
42. World Health Organization (2015) Sugar Intake for Adults and Children: Guideline. Geneva: WHO.
43. Han E & Powell LM (2013) Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States. J Acad Nutr Diet 113, 4353.
44. Hall DM & Cole TJ (2006) What use is the BMI? Arch Dis Child 91, 283286.
45. Euromonitor International (2014) Soft Drinks in South Africa: Industry Overview. London: Euromonitor International.
46. Myers A, Fig D, Tugendhaft A et al. (2015) Sugar and health in South Africa: potential challenges to leveraging policy change. Global Public Health (Epublication ahead of print version).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 123
Total number of PDF views: 700 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1141 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.