This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
1. AS Ammerman , CH Lindquist , KN Lohr et al. (2002) The efficacy of behavioral interventions to modify dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake: a review of the evidence. Prev Med 35, 25–41.
2. C Knai , J Pomerleau , K Lock et al. (2006) Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: a systematic review. Prev Med 42, 85–95.
4. D Dobson & TJ Cook (1980) Avoiding type 3 errors in program evaluation: results from a field experiment. Eval Program Plann 3, 269–276.
5. KD Wilson & RS Kurz (2008) Bridging implementation and institutionalization within organizations: proposed employment of continuous quality improvement to further dissemination. J Public Health Manag Pract 14, 109–116.
6. JH Derzon , E Sale , JF Springer et al. (2005) Estimating intervention effectiveness: synthetic projection of field evaluation results. J Prim Prev 26, 321–343.
7. JA Durlak & EP DuPre (2008) Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol 41, 327–350.
8. V Stevens , P Van Oost & I De Bourdeaudhuij (2001) Implementation process of the Flemish antibullying intervention and relation with program effectiveness. J Sch Psychol 39, 303–317.
10. KMHH Bessems , P Van Assema , MK Martens et al. (2011) Appreciation and implementation of the Krachtvoer healthy diet promotion programme for 12- to 14-year-old students of prevocational schools. BMC Public Health 11, 909.
12. LGM Raaijmakers , KMHH Bessems , SPJ Kremers et al. (2009) Breakfast consumption among children and adolescents in the Netherlands. Eur J Public Health 20, 318–324.
13. M Boekaerts , PR Rintrich & M Zeider (2000) Handbook of Self Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. M Martens , P Van Assema , T Paulussen et al. (2006) Krachtvoer: process evaluation of a Dutch programme for lower vocational schools to promote healthful diet. Health Educ Res 21, 695–704.
18. P Van Assema , J Brug , G Ronda et al. (2002) A short Dutch questionnaire to measure fruit and vegetable intake: relative validity among adults and adolescents. Nutr Health 16, 85–106.
22. M Wind , M Bjelland , C Perez-Rodrigo et al. (2008) Appreciation and implementation of a school-based intervention are associated with changes in fruit and vegetable intake in 10- to 13-year old schoolchildren – the Pro Children study. Health Educ Res 23, 997–1007.
23. L Dusenbury , R Brannigan , M Falco et al. (2003) A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res 18, 237–256.
24. C Ringwalt , M Pankratz , N Gottfredson et al. (2000) The effects of students’ curriculum engagement, attitudes toward their teachers, and perception of their teachers’ skills on school-based prevention curriculum outcomes. J Drug Educ 39, 223–237.
25. E Proctor , H Silmere , R Raghavan et al. (2011) Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Pol Ment Health 38, 65–76.
26. C Carroll , M Patterson , S Wood et al. (2007) A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci 2, 40.