Skip to main content

Identifying foods with good nutritional quality and price for the Opticourses intervention research project

  • Christophe Dubois (a1), Marion Tharrey (a1) and Nicole Darmon (a1)
Abstract Objective

People on a limited budget want to know the ‘good price’ of foods. Here we report the methodology used to produce an educational tool designed to help recognize foods with good nutritional quality and price, and assess the validity and relevancy of the tool.


A ‘Good Price Booklet’ presenting a list of foods with good nutritional quality and price was constructed. The validity of the in-booklet prices was assessed by comparing them with prices actually paid by households from the Opticourses project. The relevancy of the booklet tool was assessed by semi-structured interviews with Opticourses participants.


Socio-economically disadvantaged neighbourhoods of Marseille, France.


Ninety-one participants collected household food-purchase receipts over a 1-month period.


Based on the French food database, foods with higher-than-median nutritional quality were identified. After grouping similar foods, 100 foods were selected and their corresponding in-booklet prices were derived based on the distribution of average national prices by food group. Household food purchases data revealed that of the 2386 purchases of foods listed in the booklet, 67·1 % were bought at prices lower than the in-booklet prices. Nineteen semi-structured interviews showed that participants understood the tool and most continued using it more than a month after the intervention.


A method was developed to ease the identification of foods with good nutritional quality and price. The Good Price Booklet is an effective tool to help guide people shopping on a low budget.

Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Email
Hide All
1. James, WP, Nelson, M, Ralph, A et al. (1997) Socioeconomic determinants of health. The contribution of nutrition to inequalities in health. BMJ 314, 15451549.
2. Aggarwal, A, Monsivais, P, Cook, AJ et al. (2011) Does diet cost mediate the relation between socioeconomic position and diet quality? Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 10591066.
3. Darmon, N & Drewnowski, A (2015) The contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality: a systematic review and analysis. Nutr Rev 73, 643660.
4. Andrieu, E, Darmon, N & Drewnowski, A (2006) Low-cost diets: more energy, fewer nutrients. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 434436.
5. Townsend, MS, Aaron, GJ, Monsivais, P et al. (2009) Less-energy-dense diets of low-income women in California are associated with higher energy-adjusted diet costs. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 12201226.
6. Maillot, M, Darmon, N, Darmon, M et al. (2007) Nutrient-dense food groups have high energy costs: an econometric approach to nutrient profiling. J Nutr 137, 18151820.
7. Darmon, N, Ferguson, EL & Briend, A (2002) A cost constraint alone has adverse effects on food selection and nutrient density: an analysis of human diets by linear programming. J Nutr 132, 37643771.
8. Darmon, N, Ferguson, EL & Briend, A (2006) Impact of a cost constraint on nutritionally adequate food choices for French women: an analysis by linear programming. J Nutr Educ Behav 38, 8290.
9. Cooper, S & Nelson, M (2003) ‘Economy’ line foods from four supermarkets and brand name equivalents: a comparison of their nutrient contents and costs. J Hum Nutr Diet 16, 339347.
10. Darmon, N, Caillavet, F, Joly, C et al. (2009) Low-cost foods: how do they compare with their brand name equivalents? A French study. Public Health Nutr 12, 808815.
11. Drewnowski, A (2010) The Nutrient Rich Foods Index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods. Am J Clin Nutr 91, issue 4, 1095S1101S.
12. Maillot, M, Ferguson, EL, Drewnowski, A et al. (2008) Nutrient profiling can help identify foods of good nutritional quality for their price: a validation study with linear programming. J Nutr 138, 11071113.
13. Drewnowski, A (2013) New metrics of affordable nutrition: which vegetables provide most nutrients for least cost? J Acad Nutr Diet 113, 11821187.
14. Darmon, N (2010) Manger équilibré malgré la précarité (Balanced diet in spite of precarious conditions?). Soins 55, Suppl. 744, S10S12.
15. Marty, L, Dubois, C, Gaubard, MS et al. (2015) Higher nutritional quality at no additional cost among low-income households: insights from food purchases of ‘positive deviants’. Am J Clin Nutr 102, 190198.
16. Gamburzew, A, Darcel, N, Gazan, R et al. (2016) In-store marketing of inexpensive foods with good nutritional quality in disadvantaged neighborhoods: increased awareness, understanding, and purchasing. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13, 104.
17. Lee, A, Mhurchu, CN, Sacks, G et al. (2013) Monitoring the price and affordability of foods and diets globally. Obes Rev 14, 8295.
18. Bocquier, A, Vieux, F, Lioret, S et al. (2015) Socio-economic characteristics, living conditions and diet quality are associated with food insecurity in France. Public Health Nutr 18, 29522961.
19. Darmon, N, Vieux, F, Maillot, M et al. (2009) Nutrient profiles discriminate between foods according to their contribution to nutritionally adequate diets: a validation study using linear programming and the SAIN,LIM system. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 12271236.
20. Estruch, R, Ros, E, Salas-Salvado, J et al. (2013) Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet. N Engl J Med 368, 12791290.
21. Tharrey, M, Maillot, M, Braesco, V et al. (2017) From the SAIN,LIM system to the SENS algorithm: a review of a French approach to nutrient profiling. Proc Nutr Soc (Epublication ahead of print version).
22. Maillot, M, Drewnowski, A, Vieux, F et al. (2011) Quantifying the contribution of foods with unfavourable nutrient profiles to nutritionally adequate diets. Br J Nutr 105, 11331137.
23. Wiig, K & Smith, C (2009) The art of grocery shopping on a food stamp budget: factors influencing the food choices of low-income women as they try to make ends meet. Public Health Nutr 12, 17261734.
24. Waterlander, WE, de Mul, A, Schuit, AJ et al. (2010) Perceptions on the use of pricing strategies to stimulate healthy eating among residents of deprived neighbourhoods: a focus group study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7, 44.
25. Drewnowski, A, Darmon, N & Briend, A (2004) Replacing fats and sweets with vegetables and fruit – a question of cost. Am J Public Health 94, 15551559.
26. Darmon, N, Darmon, M, Maillot, M et al. (2005) A nutrient density standard for vegetables and fruits: nutrients per calorie and nutrients per unit cost. J Am Diet Assoc 105, 18811887.
27. Maillot, M, Darmon, N & Drewnowski, A (2010) Are the lowest-cost healthful food plans culturally and socially acceptable? Public Health Nutr 13, 11781185.
28. World Health Organization (2009) Interventions on Diet and Physical Activity: What Works. Summary Report. Geneva: WHO.
29. Molleman, GRM, Peters, LWH, Hommels, LH et al. (2006) Project quality rating by experts and practitioners: experience with Preffi 2.0 as a quality assessment instrument. Health Educ Res 21, 219229.
30. Hussain, MA (2016) Food contamination: major challenges of the future. Foods 5, issue 2, E21.
31. Darmon, N, Lacroix, A, Muller, L et al. (2014) Food price policies improve diet quality while increasing socioeconomic inequalities in nutrition. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 11, 66.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 38 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 233 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 14th September 2017 - 24th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.