Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 9
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Atuahene, Margaret Mensah, David and Adjuik, Martin 2015. A cross-sectional study of determinants of birth weight of neonates in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. Maternal Health, Neonatology and Perinatology, Vol. 1, Issue. 1,

    Licciardi, Frederick McCaffrey, Caroline Oh, Cheongeun Schmidt-Sarosi, Cecilia and McCulloh, David H. 2015. Birth weight is associated with inner cell mass grade of blastocysts. Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 103, Issue. 2, p. 382.

    Ugwa, Emmanuel Ajuluchukwu 2015. Maternal anthropometric characteristics as determinants of birth weight in north-west Nigeria: prospective study. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 28, Issue. 4, p. 460.

    Malpeli, Agustina Ferrari, María Guillermina Varea, Ana Falivene, Mariana Etchegoyen, Graciela Vojkovic, María Carmuega, Estéban Disalvo, Liliana Apezteguía, María Pereyras, Silvia Tournier, Andrea Vogliolo, Daniel and Gonzalez, Horacio F. 2013. Short-Term Evaluation of the Impact of a Fortified Food Aid Program on the Micronutrient Nutritional Status of Argentinian Pregnant Women. Biological Trace Element Research, Vol. 155, Issue. 2, p. 176.

    Sharma, Arpana and Kader, Manzur 2013. Effect of Women’s Decision-Making Autonomy on Infant’s Birth Weight in Rural Bangladesh. ISRN Pediatrics, Vol. 2013, p. 1.

    Imdad, Aamer Yakoob, Mohammad Yawar Siddiqui, Saad and Bhutta, Zulfiqar 2011. Screening and triage of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in general population and high risk pregnancies: a systematic review with a focus on reduction of IUGR related stillbirths. BMC Public Health, Vol. 11, Issue. Suppl 3, p. S1.

    Calvo, Elvira Beatriz López, Laura Beatriz Balmaceda, Yanina Del Valle Poy, Mabel Susana González, Carina Quintana, Lucía Cámera, Karen Barrientos, Ester Berlingueres, Silvina and Garciarena, Silvia 2009. Reference charts for weight gain and body mass index during pregnancy obtained from a healthy cohort. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 22, Issue. 1, p. 36.

    lampl, Michelle Gotsch, Francesca Kusanovic, Juan Pedro Gomez, Ricardo Nien, Jyh Kae Frongillo, Edward A. and Romero, Roberto 2009. Sex differences in fetal growth responses to maternal height and weight. American Journal of Human Biology, Vol. 22, Issue. 4, p. 431.

    Shapira, Niva 2008. Prenatal nutrition: a critical window of opportunity for mother and child. Women's Health, Vol. 4, Issue. 6, p. 639.


Maternal anthropometry as a predictor of birth weight

  • Shamsun Nahar (a1) (a2), C G N Mascie-Taylor (a1) and Housne Ara Begum (a1) (a3)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 September 2007

To determine whether maternal anthropometry predicted birth weight, and if so, to identify which cut-offs provided the best prediction of low birth weight (LBW) in a field situation.


Community-based longitudinal study.


A rural union of Bhaluka Upazila, Mymensingh, located 110 km north-west of Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh.


A total of 1104 normotensive, non-smoking pregnant women who attended community nutrition centres were studied from first presentation at the centre until delivery of their child.


Most of the pregnant mothers were between 20 and 34 years of age. Over one-third of the women were nulliparous, while 12.8% were multiparous (parity ≥ 4). Most (93%) mothers registered between the 3rd and 5th month of pregnancy. The frequency of LBW ( < 2500 g) was 17%. Polynomial regression analyses showed that the best predictors of birth weight (based on adjusted R2 values) were in general weight at registration and weight at month 9, with adjusted R2 ranging from 2.5% to nearly 20%. Sequential regression analyses with height and weight showed that there was a significant effect of height after removing the weight variables, and adjusted R2 increased in all analyses. Weight and height at registration month continued to be the best predictors of LBW. Sensitivity and specificity curves were drawn for each registration month, body mass index and different weight gain groups, and using different weight and height combinations. The results showed that, for registration month 3–5, a combination of weight ( ≤ 45 kg) and height ( ≤ 150 cm) gave the highest sensitivity, which was 50%. However, maternal weight ≤ 43 kg in pregnancy month 3–5 alone gave the highest sensitivity of 80%.


The best predictor of birth weight as a continuous variable was maternal weight at registration, each 1 kg increase in weight at registration being associated with an increase in birth weight of about 260 g. Maternal weight ≤ 43 kg in pregnancy month 3–5 alone gave the highest sensitivity of 80%. A combination of initial weight and height of the mother was not as good a predictor of LBW as weight alone.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Maternal anthropometry as a predictor of birth weight
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Maternal anthropometry as a predictor of birth weight
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Maternal anthropometry as a predictor of birth weight
      Available formats
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

9JM Parkin , EN Hey , JS Clowes . Rapid assessment of gestational age at birth. Archives of Disease in Childhood 1976; 51: 259–63.

10SM Ceesay , AM Prentice , TJ Cole , F Foord , LT Weaver , EM Poskitt , . Effects on birth weight and perinatal mortality of maternal dietary supplements in rural Gambia: 5 year randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 1997; 315: 786–90.

16E Karim , CGN Mascie-Taylor . The association between birth weight, sociodemographic variables and maternal anthropometry in an urban sample from Dhaka, Bangladesh. Annals of Human Biology 1997; 24: 387401.

21S Kardjati , JA Kusin , C de With . Energy supplementation in the last trimester of pregnancy in East Java: I. Effect on birthweight. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1988; 95: 783–94.

22AB Esguerra , AN Diamante , MM Jr Ramos , VS Doctor , CB Valdes , RR Pagorogon . Concise screening scales for high-risk mothers and newborns. In: Del Mundo F, E Ines-Cuyegkeng , DM Aviado eds, Primary Maternal and Neonatal Health: A Global Concern. New York: Plenum Press, 1983, 347–69.

23A Kelly , J Kevany , M de Onis , PM Shah . A WHO Collaborative Study of Maternal Anthropometry and Pregnancy Outcomes. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 1996; 53: 219–33.

25S Karan , BC Mathur . Risk factors in mothers and newborn. Indian Pediatrics 1987; 54: 3540.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *