Skip to main content
×
Home

A multipurpose tool to evaluate the nutritional quality of individual foods: Nutrimap®

  • E Labouze (a1), C Goffi (a1), L Moulay (a1) and V Azaïs-Braesco (a2)
Abstract
AbstractBackground/objectives

With obesity and nutrition-related diseases rising, public health authorities have recently insisted nutritional quality be included when advertising and labelling food. The concept of nutritional quality is, however, difficult to define. In this paper we present an innovative, science-based nutrient profiling system, Nutrimap®, which quantifies nutritional assets and weaknesses of foods.

Methods

The position of a food is defined according to its nutritional composition, food category, the consumer's nutritional needs, consumption data and major public health objectives for nutrition. Amounts of each of 15 relevant nutrients (in 100 kcal) are scored according to their ability to ‘rebalance’ or ‘unbalance’ the supply in the whole diet, compared with current recommendations and intakes. These scores are weighted differently in different food categories according to the measured relevance of the category to a nutrient's supply. Positive (assets) and negative (weaknesses) scores are totalled separately.

Results

Nutrimap® provides an overall estimate of the nutritional quality of same-category foods, enabling easy comparisons as exemplified for cereals and fruit/vegetables. Results are consistent with major nutritional recommendations and match classifications provided by other systems. Simulations for breakfasts show that Nutrimap® can help design meals of controlled nutritional value.

Conclusions

Combining objective scientific bases with pragmatic concerns, Nutrimap® appears to be effective in comparing food items. Decision-makers can set their own limits within the Nutrimap®-defined assets and weaknesses of foods and reach categorisations consistent with their objectives – from regulatory purposes to consumer information or support for designing meals (catering) or new products (food industry).

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A multipurpose tool to evaluate the nutritional quality of individual foods: Nutrimap®
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A multipurpose tool to evaluate the nutritional quality of individual foods: Nutrimap®
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A multipurpose tool to evaluate the nutritional quality of individual foods: Nutrimap®
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email eric.labouze@biois.com
References
Hide All
1Commission of the European Communities. Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on nutrition and health claims made on foods. COM (2003) 424 final [online], 16 July 2003. Available at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/pdf/2003/com2003_0424en01.pdf. Accessed 23 November 2006.
2Azaïs-Braesco V, Goffi C, Labouze E. Nutrient profiling: comparison and critical analysis of existing systems. Public Health Nutrition 2006; 9(5): 613–22.
3The Swedish key hole. National Food Administration administrative provisions on the use of a particular symbol [online], 2004. Available at http://www.slv.se/upload/dokument/In_English/Food_regulations/2005_9_Particular%20 symbol_0610.pdf. Accessed 23 November 2006.
4Netherlands Nutrition Center. Criteria for the nutritional evaluation of foods. The Netherlands tripartite classification model for foods [online], 2005. Available at http://www.voedingscentrum.nl/NR/rdonlyres/OAF85A19-79B1-4DB5-A0E8-C8BFFD44B089/0/Criteriaengelssite.pdf. Accessed 23 November 2006.
5World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, Nutrition and The Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a Joint WHO/Food and Agriculture Organization Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series No. 916. Geneva: WHO, 2003.
6Ferro-Luzzi A, Gibney M, Sjöström Meds.Nutrition and Diet for Healthy Lifestyles in Europe: the EURODIET evidence [special issue]. Public Health Nutrition 2001; 4(2B): 437740.
7Ministère de la Santé et des Solidarités. Deuxième Program national de nutrition santé – 2006–2010 – Actions et measures [online], 2006. Available at http://www.sante.gouv.fr/htm/actv/pnns_060906/plan.pdf.Accessed 23 November 2006.
8Volatier JL, ed. Enquête individuelle et nationale de consommation alimentaire. Paris: Collection Tec&Doc, Editions Lavoisier, 2000.
9Gatenby SJ, Hunt P, Rayner M. The national food guide: development of dietetic criteria and nutritional characteristics. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 1995; 8: 323–34.
10Gibney M, Sandström B. A framework for food-based dietary guidelines in the European Union. Public Health Nutrition 2001; 4(2A): 293305.
11Rayner M, Scarborough P, Boxer A, Stockley L. Nutrient Profiles: Development of Final Model. Final Report [online], 2005. Available at http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/nutprofr.pdf. Accessed 23 November 2006.
12Paul AA, Southgate DAT. McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th ed. London: HMSO, 1978.
13CIQUAL. Répertoire général des aliments, 2nd ed. Paris: Tec&Doc, 2002.
14Martin A, ed. Apports nutritionnels conseillés pour la population française, 3d ed. Paris: Collection Tec&Doc, Editions Lavoisier, 2000.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 6
Total number of PDF views: 66 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 137 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.